Slacker in Chief given Nobel Prize

Yes, The Slacker in Chief has one the Nobel prize. Unbelievable. I first saw men­tion of this on twit­ter and went “WTF, Over?”

A quick run over to the Drudge report and I found a link to a Reuters story. What was the first paragraph?

U.S. President Barack Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday for giv­ing the world “hope for a bet­ter future” and striv­ing for nuclear dis­ar­ma­ment, in a sur­prise award that drew crit­i­cism as well as praise.

I think I’m going to be sick. He has won what used to be a very pres­ti­gious award for “Hope and Change.” This is a man who has done absolutely noth­ing in his life other then to con peo­ple into think­ing he cares about them.

To con­tinue…

The deci­sion to bestow one of the world’s top acco­lades on a pres­i­dent less than nine months into his first term, who has yet to score a major for­eign pol­icy suc­cess, pro­voked gasps of sur­prise from jour­nal­ists at the announce­ment in Oslo.

Even the clue­less butt kiss­ing syco­phants of the media were shocked at this. I’m sure the gen­eral thought run­ning around what passes for a Mainly Irrelevant Media type went “Nobel Prize? For what?”

The Norwegian Nobel Committee praised Obama for “his extra­or­di­nary efforts to strengthen inter­na­tional diplo­macy and coop­er­a­tion between peoples.”

*blink*

And what color is the sky where you morons live?

“Very rarely has a per­son to the same extent as Obama cap­tured the world’s atten­tion and given its peo­ple hope for a bet­ter future,” the com­mit­tee said in a citation.

A bet­ter future? Oh sure, let’s look at what he’s done so far shall we? Wrecked the econ­omy of the United States, backed every sin­gle mur­der­ous tyrant in the world, done his best to under­mine democ­racy world wide, and of course, brought the world to the brink of nuclear war in the Middle East.

Apparently I’m not the only one won­der­ing if the Nobel Committee dropped some bad acid or something.

The Palestinian Islamist move­ment Hamas, which con­trols the Gaza Strip and opposes a peace treaty with Israel, said the award was pre­ma­ture at best.

“Obama has a long way to go still and lots of work to do before he can deserve a reward,” said Hamas offi­cial Sami Abu Zuhri. “Obama only made promises and did not con­tribute any sub­stance to world peace. And he has not done any­thing to ensure jus­tice for the sake of Arab and Muslim causes.”

So much for the ter­ror­ist vote Obama was count­ing on. Well, they ARE just a bunch of baby killing scum­bags, per­haps they are just an iso­lated group.

“EMBARRASSING JOKE”

Issam al-Khazraji, a day laborer in Baghdad, said: “He doesn’t deserve this prize. All these prob­lems — Iraq, Afghanistan — have not been solved…The man of ‘change’ hasn’t changed any­thing yet.”

Liaqat Baluch, a senior leader of the Jamaat-e-Islami, a con­ser­v­a­tive reli­gious party in Pakistan, called the award an embar­rass­ing “joke.”

Ummm, no. It looks like most of the peo­ple in the Middle East don’t think that “The One” deserves the prize. So, who does think Jugears should get this?

The chief Palestinian peace nego­tia­tor, Saeb Erekat, wel­comed the award to Obama and expressed hope that “he will be able to achieve peace in the Middle East.”

There’s that Hopey Changey crap again. At least Jimmy Carter, the worst pres­i­dent in the 20th cen­tury and the worst ex-president in his­tory, man­aged to get a peace agree­ment between Egypt and Israel that is still working…somewhat.

So, what rea­son­ing did the crack­heads on the Nobel Committee give?

Nobel Committee Chairman Thorbjoern Jagland rejected sug­ges­tions from jour­nal­ists that Obama was get­ting the prize too early, say­ing it rec­og­nized what he had already done over the past year.

Hmm, According to Rick Moran of the Right Wing Nuthouse:

According to their own web­site, the dead­line for the sub­mis­sion of names to be con­sid­ered for the prize is February 1.

Obama was not nom­i­nated based on what he had accom­plished as pres­i­dent because he had been in office for about 11 days.

Ayup, Obama was nom­i­nated for being “Not Bush.” Of course that’s not what the com­mit­tee claims:

The com­mit­tee said it attached “spe­cial impor­tance to Obama’s vision of and work for a world with­out nuclear weapons,” say­ing he had “cre­ated a new cli­mate in inter­na­tional politics.”

I agree, Obama has cre­ated a new cli­mate. He has turned, in 9 short months, the most pow­er­ful nation in his­tory into a bank­rupt laugh­ing stock. The Middle East is on the verge of a new war that could eas­ily go nuclear and that coke snort­ing mega­lo­ma­niac has all but sur­ren­dered to the Taliban and Al Qeda in Afghanistan.

Obama laid out his vision on elim­i­nat­ing nuclear arms in a speech in Prague in April. But he was not the first American pres­i­dent to set that goal, and acknowl­edged it might not be reached in his lifetime.

Yeah, keep going the way you are dumbo and we will elim­i­nate nukes. If they are used, then they will be gone. Of course, so will most of the planet as well.

The Nobel Peace Prize used to actu­ally mean some­thing. Over the last 20 years it has become a com­plete joke. Those anchovy snort­ing ivory tower morons have destroyed the mean­ing of that award.

People who actu­ally stopped wars, or man­aged to keep them from start­ing in the first place have now been replaced by incom­pe­tents, (Obama), con men, (Al Gore), and mur­der­ers, (Yassir Arafat).

Of course you know that mega­lo­ma­niac junkie with delu­sions of com­pe­tence will accept this. I’m sure he’s already warm­ing up the TOTUS and mak­ing sure the FBOTUS, (First Bitch of the United States), has a nice inap­pro­pri­ate out­fit to wear to the awards ceremony.

Now if you will excuse me, I feel the need to regur­gi­tate my break­fast. I think I’ll get an early start and upchuck lunch before I have it.

~The Angry Webmaster~

Post Footer auto­mat­i­cally gen­er­ated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

Tweet This Post Facebook