Good day all. For years, we have looked at court decisions that suppress the constitutional rights of individuals and seen that many are Obama judges. It’s actually become a meme. Now we’re beginning to suffer the effects of the Biden judges.
The Biden judges have in general, been doctrinaire leftists who can’t tell the difference between men and women. They have also been reliable in protecting the Deep State and actively suppressing pretty much the entire constitution. We now have one that is actively suppressing Virginia’s work in clearing unauthorized voters from their voting rolls. Here are the details from Fox News:
A federal judge on Friday ordered Virginia to halt its removal of potential non-citizens from state voter rolls, a decision expected to restore the voting rights to some 1,600 residents ahead of Election Day.
Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin told Fox News shortly after the ruling that his administration is planning to file an emergency stay for the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals to block the injunction, which he noted was handed down just 11 days before the election.
He added that his administration would appeal it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, if necessary.
I suspect he will have to. The 4th Circuit is loaded with Obama judges and they have demonstrated repeatedly their utter contempt for the Constitution. This is the reason Obama and Dingy Harry Reid packed the court in the first place.
As for those 1600 “Residents?” If even one of them is not a citizen, then as far as I’m concerned, the judge is committing election and voter fraud and should be dealt with appropriately. (Like removal from the bench and a trial)
“This is a stunning ruling by a federal judge who is ordering Virginia to reinstate individuals who have self-identified as noncitizens back on the voter rolls,” Youngkin said on air on Fox News Channel via telephone shortly after the judge’s decision was announced.
Bluntly. Governor Youngkin should have flat out told that crooked judge that her order will not be followed. I would have also suggested that the Attorney General of Virginia indict that judge. Dragging that communist off the bench and off to jail in cuffs would send a real message to the rest of the judicial branch, that there are limits.
His remarks come after U.S. Judge Patricia Giles issued a preliminary injunction Friday to reinstate all voters that had been removed from state voter rolls in the state in the last 90 days, finding that the removals had been in fact “systematic,” not individualized, and were thus a violation of federal law.
Virginia has a law on the books that has existed for decades. It’s been used by both Republican and Democrat governors. However, there is a fair chance that the Greatest President of the 21st Century, Donald Trump, will win Virginia unless the Democrats have some way of stealing the elections. Hence the actions of this Biden Judge.
Since the Tainted Election of 2020, most states have begun cleaning out their voter rolls. This has really hit the Democrats since their usual voters, the deceased, are unable to respond to the various clerks who try to contact them to confirm that they actually exist, are alive, and are in the state. For the last few years, we have seen the leftists screaming about “Taking rights away from “The people!” In other words, their ability to easily rig elections has been severely curtailed.
The preliminary injunction handed down by a federal judge in Alexandria comes just weeks after the Department of Justice sued Virginia over its program, arguing the removals were conducted too close to the Nov. 5 elections and violate the National Voter Registration Act — a federal law that requires states to halt all systematic voter roll maintenance for a 90-day “quiet period” before an election.
That law is constitutionally questionable. The states are the ones who maintain the voter rolls, not the federal government. In point of fact, the Biden Maladministration has pointedly refused to provide information to the states when they request data to confirm the citizenship of voters.
Justice Department officials also cited concerns that eligible votes may have incorrectly been removed from the rolls without adequate notice, or enough time to correct the mistake.
“States may remove names from official lists of voters in various ways and for various reasons, but they may not carry on this kind of systematic removal program so close to a federal election,” DOJ officials wrote in filing their Oct. 11 lawsuit.
Another lie from the Department of (In)Justice. Virginia has a mechanism in place to handle people who may have been erroneously removed from the voter rolls. They will be able to cast a provisional ballot and they provide the requisite identification to prove their citizenship and their residency.
The injunction upholds this line of thinking, and sparked fierce, immediate pushback from Youngkin, who has insisted the voters were removed legally and has himself objected to a court ruling less than two weeks before a federal election.
“This is a stunning ruling by a federal judge who is ordering Virginia to reinstate individuals who have self-identified as noncitizens back on the voter rolls,” Youngkin said on Fox News Channel via telephone shortly after the judge’s decision was announced.
That, right there, in my personal opinion, is grounds for the impeachment and removal of one Patricia Giles from the federal bench. When you have people come out and say “Hey, I’m not a citizen. I don’t know how I got on the voter rolls. Please remove me.” These people, legal resident aliens, know perfectly well that not only is it illegal for them to vote, it is grounds for immediate deportation after their prison sentence has been completed. (Or they just boot them out and ban them for life from reentry)
Giles said Friday that there is reason to believe voters in Virginia were being mistakenly removed from the rolls. “This process has resulted in eligible voters having their voting registration flagged,” she said in issuing the preliminary injunction.
Reason to believe? I’m sorry, but that is not a valid legal reason. Unless this judge has actual evidence that a citizen and resident of Virginia had been struck from the rolls, she has no grounds to issue her illegal ruling. Even if she did, the follow up question would have been, “Is there a mechanism to allow this person to vote on election day?” The answer to that is yes.
At issue was an executive order signed by Youngkin in August that authorized the state to conduct “daily” updates to its voter rolls.
The order allowed the state to compare its Department of Motor Vehicles’ noncitizens list against its list of registered voters. Those without citizenship were then informed that their voter registration would be canceled unless they could prove their citizenship in 14 days.
Now there is the possibility that someone was a green card holder when he or she got their drivers license but has since become a citizen of the United States. They will have all the appropriate documentation of that great day when they were sworn in as the newest citizens of the United States of America and will have no problem providing the needed data.
Youngkin has insisted the voters were removed legally and is based on precedent from a 2006 state law enacted by then-Gov. Tim Kaine, a Democrat.
Well there’s your problem! If you had been a Democrat governor then there wouldn’t have been any issues over this because Democrat. Governor Younkin has already appealed this joke of a decision. It will be interesting to see how the 4th court of appeals rules. If they go as I expect and go against the Constitution, then it’s off to SCOTUS. They will probably bury Giles and the 4th Circuit Court of appeals.
What all this has shown is that the Democrat Party is terrified that President Trump is going to win the election. Worse, he might have really massive coattails and got solid majorities in both the House and the senate. This will allow a really good Attorney General f the United States to clean house in the DoJ and to start looking, really hard, at some of these judges. Perhaps a few might be invited to resign or face criminal prosecution on actual criminal charges with actual, real evidence. Ok, we can hope, can’t we?
Thatisall
(3 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...
~The Angry Webmaster~
