Good morning all, it’s the Angry Webmaster with more interesting tidbits from our masters in Washington D.C.
The Drudge report has a big headline that states:
‘HOMELAND SECURITY’ MONITORING DRUDGE ‘WILL RETAIN INFORMATION’
The headline links to an article by the Atlantic Wire which gives out the gory details.
From the Atlantic Wire:
It’s unclear exactly why, but the Department of Homeland has been operating a “Social Networking/Media Capability” program to monitor the top blogs, forums and social networks online for at least the past 18 months.
They don’t know why DHS is doing this? I can tell you in one, easy to understand word.
OBAMA.
The Obama administration has been working to create an internal network of informers since before day one of the administration. ((See the ATTACKWATCH web site)) Obama and his minions will not tolerate anyone who might not agree with them 100 percent. Of course that’s not what DHS says:
The purpose of the project is to “collect information used in providing situational awareness and establishing a common operating picture.” Whatever that means.
It means whatever Janet Incompetano says it means. Now I wasn’t able to find the full list of sites and services being “Monitored” by DHS on the Atlantic Wire web site. So I did a Google search and lo and behold, I found a PDF file with the full list. It’s called The Publicly Available Social Media Monitoring and Situational Awareness Initiative Update. Sadly, Anger Central isn’t on it. I guess they don’t think we’re worth monitoring. Perhaps if I insult Obama even more?? 🙂
The list of sites is very extensive, and pretty much makes no sense at all. There are a few exceptions of course. I do see watching Wikileaks. I’m sure they would like to know what else that treasonous scumbag Bradley Manning shipped to Julian Assange.
I can also see watching Twitter. Many major events have been announced on Twitter, such as natural disasters, terrorist incidents, etc. long before they reach the news or intelligence services. The Drudge Report? Why would they monitor that? Could it be, possibly, because Drudge has been known to post stories that don’t put the Obama Tyranny Administration in in a tongue bathing positive light?
Once again, we are seeing the deep seated paranoia of of Progressive Liberal Democrats and the Obama administration. Considering the recent bills now being considered, (SOPA, PROTECT-IP), and the blatantly unconstitutional sections of the NDAA 2012 as well as other things. Obama and the Democrats are seeing the writing on the wall. Their policies have failed miserably and they are looking at a potential blowout in the Election in November. I would hazard a guess that they are setting up the bureaucratic environment so that they can maintain power even when they have lost elective office. This is one reason to elect someone who ISN’T insane to slash and burn the size of government next November.
Thatisall
~The Angry Webmaster~
(1 votes, average: 1.00 out of 5)
Loading...
Dept. of Homeland Security now monitoring web sites! – #angercentralarchives http://t.co/XQbeGX0tn0
Dept. of Homeland Security now monitoring web sites! – #angercentralarchives http://t.co/gPSVgxwy
In Jan. 2010 it was reported Top Obama Czar Cass Sunstein supported infiltrating and spying on Americans, their groups and organizations to disrupt and neutralize Americans that spread conspiracy theories, including against U.S. Government. This would be accomplished in part by U.S. Government assets disseminating counter-information.
Interestingly, Cass Sunstein’s infiltration proposal appeared to resemble Rep. Jane Harman’s “2007 Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act” HR 1955 that stressed, disrupting political and other groups without evidence of wrongdoing. Had Harman’s bill passed, U.S. Government would have the power to spy on and intimidate Americans from exercising their Constitutional Right to Free Speech and Association. Millions of Americans would fear supporting or attending any political and other “planned meeting” out of concern they might be labeled a terrorist or supporter of Home Grown Terrorism or Violent Radicalization.
Under Rep. Harman’s “2007 Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act” Government would only have to allege a group member “Thought about committing violence or damaging property” to label an individual or group “prone” to committing “Violent Radicalization or Terrorism. Activists who set up web sites promoting a “Planned Activity”; wrote, emailed or handed out “flyers” promoting a “Planned” event or demonstration could be alleged to have inspired Violent Radicalization or Homegrown Terrorism—even if not violence occurred. Demonstrators alleged by police to have blocked a roadway, intimidated drivers, shoppers, employees; anyone from entering or leaving a place could be accused of coercing government or its people. Under the Harmon legislation “Information flyers” NOT intended by the author to be distributed by a particular group or at a planned event—but somehow got distributed, could potentially open the door for government to charge the author promoted “Violent Radicalization or Homegrown Terrorism. Such concerns might have crushed written dissent.
The “Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act” mentioned, “any planned meeting or bodily act in America” against a U.S. foreign alley; no violence was required. For example: American labor unions, human rights and environmental organizations could potentially have been at risk under The “Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act” if they (planned or had meetings in America) to lawfully protest a foreign U.S. alley and or networked with or supported foreign activists that intended or protested a U.S. foreign alley. The Harmon bill appeared to criminalize constitutionally protected 1st amendment activities. Had the Harmon bill passed, U.S. Government, federal and state police would have had little difficulty terminating American activists and organizations exercising their Constitutional Right to Free Speech, Free Association and Expression. Police and Agent Provocateurs could easily destroy e.g. any anti-war group or organization by covertly joining a protest demonstration to instigate violence; or undercover police covertly contacting participants before, at or after a “planned” meeting or demonstration… (then lie) allege a group member committed or intended to commit violence in order that government could assert a group was ideologically based toward violence; supported “Violent Radicalization or Homegrown Terrorism. Although The 2007 “Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act” Failed To Pass, subsequently in 2012, Congress destroyed and diminished many of Americans’ Constitutional Rights upon Pres. Obama signing The National Defense Authorization ACT of 2012 (NDAA). Under NDAA, U.S. Government does not need probable cause or corroborating evidence to Indefinitely Detain Americans on U.S. Soil without charges if suspected of being involved in terrorism or posing a threat to National Security. Consequently Indefinitely Detained Americans have no right to legal counsel, a trial or Habeas Corpus.
Alarmingly Corrupt Police, Government Agents and Agent Provocateurs may too easily falsify reports and give false testimony see (COINTELPRO) to cause U.S. Government to disappear Americans; cause innocent U.S. Citizens to be swept off the street and indefinitely incarcerated based only on suspicion that someone is a terrorist or involved in terrorism. Note no actual planned, intended or violent act is required for U.S. Government to allege someone is involved in terrorism under (NDAA).
Allow me to share some poetic justice with you, “Simply too Good to Resist, Anonymous Hacks into Homeland Security and Leaks Watch List.”
Pingback: URL
Pingback: angrywebmaster
Pingback: nedb
Pingback: angrywebmaster