{"id":12797,"date":"2013-08-20T10:01:38","date_gmt":"2013-08-20T14:01:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=12797"},"modified":"2023-01-18T05:02:36","modified_gmt":"2023-01-18T10:02:36","slug":"more-wonderful-obamacare-security","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=12797","title":{"rendered":"More wonderful Obamacare security"},"content":{"rendered":"

A couple of weeks ago, I wrote about the computer security<\/a> systems for the Obamacare exchanges. Basically, there wasn\u2019t going to be any. This was due to the government being months behind on the testing of the systems. Well, now we are going further along this path of utter incompetence.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Because so many people, like 60+ percent, are dead set against Obamacare, Obama and his thugs have come up with this wonderful idea to hire thousands of \u201cNavigators\u201d who will walk you into enslavement<\/i><\/span> help you get into the system. It turns out there is going to be a small problem with these people. There won\u2019t be any background checks on them. There will be no way to know if the person you are dealing with is a convicted felon who is stealing your identity. Here are some details from The Hill<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi argued late Friday that new hires under ObamaCare could threaten the private information of people trying to get health insurance.<\/p>\n

Bondi said that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is making it easier for someone to be hired as a so-called navigator, cutting back on background checks and eliminating a fingerprinting requirement, which could make it easier for a person\u2019s private information to fall into the wrong hands.<\/p>\n

\u201cBecause of time constraints, HHS [is] cutting back on the requirement to become a navigator, meaning they’re not going to be doing background checks. They’re not going to be fingerprinting these people,\u201d said Bondi in an interview with Fox.<\/p>\n

\u201cAnd it’s more than navigators. It’s people that assist the navigators. Now, these navigators will have our consumers throughout the country’s most personal and private information: tax return information, Social Security information. And our biggest fear, of course, is identity theft.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"Obamacare,<\/a><\/p>\n

There is a very simple reason for all this. The Obamacare train wreck is way behind schedule and Obama, along with the other members of the Progressive Liberal Democrats are demanding that this pile of worm feces be put into effect no matter what the cost.<\/p>\n

Earlier this week, Bondi and a dozen other Republican state attorneys general sent HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius a letter calling her attention to this privacy issue and asking her to implement more stringent privacy requirements and safeguards. They\u2019ve given Sebelius until Aug. 28 to respond.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Which she won\u2019t. That little tyrant loves the thought of Obamacare and finally ending that hated constitution once and for all. And this isn\u2019t all. Recently, it\u2019s come to light that Obamacare basically ends the 4th<\/sup> Amendment. There is a section that enables mandatory home inspections for \u201cAt Risk\u201d families. Here area few details from Political Outcast<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Reuters <\/i>of course reported<\/a> on it like it was a great thing. They looked at some study that spanned 20 years that showed that home visits improve \u201cat-risk\u201d families, specifically those families with pre-maturely born babies and Down syndrome kids.<\/p>\n

\u201cHome visits by nurses or other trained health professionals can improve the development of preterm infants, parenting and the home environment, according to a new review of recent research\u2026 The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, has set aside funding for home visiting programs for at-risk families to improve outcomes for mothers and their babies born prematurely\u2026 There are 400 such programs currently providing care to at least 500,000 U.S. families, largely funded by state and local governments.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

So once again, the federal government is seizing control of things that are the reponsibilities of the states and cities. Why am I not surprised?<\/p>\n

What the Reuters <\/i>article doesn\u2019t mention is all those families who will be considered \u201cat-risk.\u201d Here are some other criteria<\/a> under Obamacare that could be used against you to justify a \u201chome inspection\u201d by a local, state or federal government official:<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\n