{"id":15074,"date":"2014-06-02T16:14:00","date_gmt":"2014-06-02T20:14:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=15074"},"modified":"2020-10-13T08:21:34","modified_gmt":"2020-10-13T12:21:34","slug":"obamas-destruction-of-the-energy-sector","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=15074","title":{"rendered":"Obama\u2019s destruction of the Energy sector"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. Along with all the other news that came out over the weekend, news was released that the EPA is planning on destroying the energy sector of the United States on orders of King Putt.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The proposed regulations will force a 30 percent cut in carbon emissions, (Primarily CO2, better known as Plant Food), and that if these go into effect, all fossil fuel plants will have to comply by 2030. Here are the details from Fox News<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

The Obama administration took aim at the coal industry on Monday by mandating a 30 percent cut in carbon emissions at fossil fuel-burning power plants by 2030 — despite claims the regulation will cost nearly a quarter-million jobs a year and force plants across the country to close. The controversial regulation is one of the most sweeping efforts to tackle global warming by this or any other administration. <\/b><\/i><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\"Al-Gore<\/a><\/p>\n

Global Warming. Yes, once again the State Mandated Religion is coming to the fore and you WILL convert or else. Sounds like Islam, doesn\u2019t it? As we have seen in the past, and I have written about, the whole Global Warming business is fraudulent. This is one reason you see the Warmists using the term \u201cClimate Change\u201d instead of \u201cGlobal Warming.\u201d There is no warming and it looks like we might be in a cooling period, as the 5 FEET of snow in my front yard last winter that I had to shovel indicates.<\/p>\n

\n

The 645-page plan, expected to be final next year, is a centerpiece of President Obama’s climate change agenda, and a step that the administration hopes will get other countries to act when negotiations on a new international treaty resume next year. <\/b><\/i><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

That sounds like a repeat of the Economic destruction treaty, better known as the \u201cKyoto Protocols\u201d to me. That treaty\u2019s requirements were so onerous, that the Senate wouldn\u2019t even consider it. But, as I mentioned, this is a religion and facts have no place in it.<\/p>\n

\n

“We have a moral obligation to act,” EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy said, in announcing the plan Monday morning. <\/b><\/i><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

No, you don\u2019t. In fact, as far as I\u2019m concerned, you need to be removed from your position and the EPA shut down. You have demonstrated a total and complete contempt for the rule of law.<\/p>\n

\n

The draft regulation sidesteps Congress, where Obama’s Democratic allies have failed to pass a so-called “cap-and-trade” plan to limit such emissions.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The reason Cap and Trade failed is simple. It was a load of crap designed to reward people like Al Gore. It was so bad, that Australia, which did implement a Cap and Trade system, recently closed it down as a complete failure and a massive waste of money and resources ((Australia Turns Back the Clock on Historic Carbon Tax, Cap-and-Trade)). The damage it would have done to the United States would have made the Great Depression look like a mild recession.<\/p>\n

\n

Under the plan, carbon emissions would be reduced 30 percent by 2030, compared with 2005 levels. The proposal sets off a complex regulatory process in which the 50 states will each determine how to meet customized targets set by the EPA. States could have until 2017 to submit a plan to cut power plant pollution, and 2018 if they join with other states to tackle the problem, according to the EPA’s proposal.<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

And if I were the governors of the states affected by this totalitarian power grab, I would tell the EPA to pound sand. If necessary, and I were the governor of one of these states, I would seek the indictment of the head of the EPA along with every single EPA employee in my state and charge them with sabotage and conspiracy. (Ok I\u2019m no lawyer, but the devastation this will cause is criminal in my mind)<\/p>\n

\n

If a state refuses to create a plan, the EPA can make its own. <\/b><\/i><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\"hilter<\/a><\/p>\n

You vill Comply! Seig Heil! My response, if I were in charge would be \u201cTry and enforce it!\u201d<\/p>\n

\"chuck<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

The Obama administration claimed the changes would produce jobs, cut electricity bills and save thousands of lives thanks to cleaner air. But critics disputed the estimates.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

“Throughout his presidency, Barack Obama has adopted a my way or the highway approach and that explains why he’s shoving these EPA regulations down our throat,” Republican Party Chairman Reince Priebus said in a statement. “The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has found that each year this regulation will kill 224,000 jobs and force energy rates to skyrocket, so it’s no wonder President Obama is circumventing Congress to implement his latest job-killing regulation.”<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

What do expect from Der Fubar? He has repeatedly shown his utter contempt for the Constitution and the law, even those he\u2019s signed.<\/p>\n

\"jmOneNationUnderSocialism<\/a><\/p>\n

On Saturday, Obama tried to bolster public support for the new rule by arguing that carbon-dioxide emissions are a national health crisis — beyond hurting the economy and causing global warming.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cWe don\u2019t have to choose between the health of our economy and the health of our children,\u201d Obama said in his weekly address. \u201cAs president and as a parent, I refuse to condemn our children to a planet that\u2019s beyond fixing.\u201d<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Oh great. He\u2019s pulled out the standard PLFD chestnut, \u201cIt\u2019s for the Children!\u201d Anything that destroys freedom, liberty and the economy is always \u201cFor the Children.\u201d The fact is, we have been cleaning up coal plants for decades. The major impediment to cleaner power plants is, the EPA. Normally, power plant owners, like everyone else, prefer to do upgrades as time, technology and money permit. They see what needs to be fixed and budget for it. Or they would if they were allowed to. What really happens is if they want to do some maintenance and upgrades, they have to do everything mandated by the EPA at once. This isn\u2019t cost effective, so the plants don\u2019t get the upgrades they need.<\/p>\n

There is another issue as well. The United States gets 40 percent of it\u2019s power from coal. These new rules will force many, if not most of them to just shut down. Since there are no replacements in the works, thanks to the EPA, there will be blackouts. Obama\u2019s EPA has even ticked off a number of Democrats who fear for their jobs.<\/p>\n

\n

Many of the Democrats who are raising concerns represent coal-producing states and face tough 2014 reelection bids. Among them is West Virginia Democratic Rep. Nick Rahall, whose state gets 96 percent of its power from coal. Rahall said Thursday that he didn’t have specific details about the rule but “from everything we know we can be sure of this: It will be bad for jobs.”<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Bad for jobs moron? How about bad for actual living? What these rules will do is put West Virginia back into the 19th<\/sup> century. Of course, since coal is a major job creator in that state, only having tfour percent of the power generation use used to have wont\u2019 be a problem. People will have abandoned the state looking for work and a place with electricity. Of course Il Douche is saying he\u2019s being forced to do this.<\/p>\n

\n

Obama is being forced to use the 1970s-era old Clean Air Act, after failing during his first term to get Congress to pass a law. The law has long been used to regulate pollutants like soot, mercury and lead but has only recently been applied to greenhouse gases.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

“There are no national limits to the amount of carbon pollution that existing plants can pump into the air we breathe. None,” Obama said Saturday in his weekly radio and Internet address. “We limit the amount of toxic chemicals like mercury, sulfur, and arsenic that power plants put in our air and water. But they can dump unlimited amounts of carbon pollution into the air. It’s not smart, it’s not safe, and it doesn’t make sense.”<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

There is a reason carbon dioxide isn\u2019t in the law. It isn\u2019t a pollutant, it is a natural part of the biosphere. Without CO2, plants die. With plants, we die. The problem with the Church of Global Warming, besides their fanaticism, is their lack of a grasp on science…or reality for that matter. They believe that unless we, for all intents and purposes, end human life on Earth, the planet will have a runaway greenhouse effect and turn into another Venus. They don\u2019t just fail to understand, but refuse to understand that a runaway greenhouse turning the Earth into Venus is pretty much impossible.<\/p>\n

\"climatologyreligion\"<\/a><\/p>\n

To begin with, Venus is a lot closer to the sun than the Earth. That does have an effect on things. Then Venus doesn\u2019t rotate as fast on it\u2019s axis as the Earth and doesn\u2019t have a really big, (or any) moon. All these things can effect the temperature. And then there is the geological record. The earth was a lot hotter millions of years ago. It\u2019s one of the reasons the dinosaurs flourished. CO2 levels were far higher then they were back in the times of the Dinosaurs. Real scientists, rather then the frauds like Michael Mann believe that CO2 levels might actually be a bit to low. Of course those scientists are considered heretics by the Church of Global Warming and they are burned at the stake using a renewable, carbon neutral source of fire.<\/p>\n

\"don't<\/a><\/p>\n

Barack Obama and his minions at the EPA are doing all this for one reason only. To institute totalitarian control and force Americans into Socialism against our will. I am calling on Congress and the Governors to stop the EPA by any means necessary. In congress, if it means shutting down the department the EPA, (Which long ago outlived its usefulness), then defund and close it. If it means the states have to refuse their orders, and even refuse to obey the courts, then so be it. If needed, the governors, with the agreement of the legislatures, should deploy national guard troops around the power stations and send in state police and county sheriffs to physically close the local EPA offices, Otherwise, the United States will collapse and become a third world nation.<\/p>\n

\"times_up_flag_z\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Thatisall<\/p>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n

\"1\"2\"3\"4\"5 (1<\/strong> votes, average: 5.00<\/strong> out of 5)
<\/span><\/span>Loading...<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Our proposed Clean Power Plan will cut carbon pollution …<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
Our proposed Clean Power Plan will cut carbon pollution from power plants by 30% by #ActOnClimate. admin June 2 … Today’s @EPA @WhiteHouse announcement will be a great help in WA’s drive to reduce carbon pollution #ActOnClimate.<\/div>\n
http:\/\/trendypie.com\/ \u2014 Mon, 02 Jun 2014 12:04:35 -0700<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

BBC News \u2013 US unveils sharp curbs on coal power plants …<\/a><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Clean Power Plan seeks to cut carbon emissions by 30% by 2030. The 645-page rule is a centrepiece of President Barack Obama’s plans to leverage similar commitments from polluting nations …<\/div>\n
http:\/\/environmentaljusticetv.wordpress.com\/<\/a> \u2014 Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:59:00 -0700<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

EPA wants power industry to cut carbon 30% by 2030 …<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
EPA carbon limit proposal a huge test for Obama administration. Cutting carbon by around one third is not going to be easy. With the media unfailingly reporting about the increase in global warming, policy makers, NGOs and governments are …<\/div>\n
http:\/\/nvonews.com\/ \u2014 Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:52:17 -0700<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

I guess when you’re desperate, you resort to lies and fakery …<\/a><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
environmental-leftist-appeasing directive, which is yet another new EPA \u201crule\u201d to cut coal emissions. U.S. carbon dioxide limits touted by EPA as economically wise http:\/\/t.co\/5D7d9HdArd pic.twitter.com\/dx6XOZdI3e … In order to bolster their their already beyond ridiculous advocacy of Obama, and whatever is his latest liberal-left big government boondoggle, CBC \u201cNews\u201d obviously felt they needed to fake you out a little, and gin-up the news with a stock photo of Obama wiping his …<\/div>\n
http:\/\/www.proudtobecanadian.ca\/<\/a> \u2014 Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:49:33 -0700<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Here’s How Much Obama’s New Carbon Rule Will Really Cost<\/a><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
The Obama administration on Monday unveiled historic new regulations aimed at cutting carbon emissions as much as 30% from 2005 levels by 2030. Republicans say the new … Because of the reduction of pollutants like sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and soot from the air, the EPA says the new regulations will prevent up to 6,600 premature deaths, based on two studies showing survival rates declining with more exposure to atmospheric particulate matter. Mortality climate change.<\/div>\n
http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/<\/a> \u2014 Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:09:25 -0700<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Obama’s out-of-control EPA could be key to Republican …<\/a><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
The rule will force power plants to cut carbon emissions 30% by 2030 from 2005 levels. Though the details aren’t finalized, the Wall Street Journal reported the rule’s broad implications: Each state will have a different reduction standard, and …<\/div>\n
http:\/\/www.unitedliberty.org\/<\/a> \u2014 Mon, 02 Jun 2014 10:27:45 -0700<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Good day all. Along with all the other news that came out over the weekend, news was released that the EPA is planning on destroying the energy sector of the United States on orders of King Putt. Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[43,37,71,8,219,35],"tags":[52,44,8,34,27],"class_list":["post-15074","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-global-warming","category-liberty-politics","category-news-of-the-day","category-politics","category-the-good-idea-fairy","category-tyranny","tag-constitution","tag-globull-worming","tag-politics","tag-stupidity","tag-totalitarianism"],"views":1409,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":40211,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=40211","url_meta":{"origin":15074,"position":0},"title":"And for his next trick, Biden destroys the U.S. power grid","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"April 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. Since the worst president* in history was installed into the White House, he, or more accurately, his handlers, have been at war with with the American energy sector. When the Greatest President of the 21st Century, Donald Trump, left office, energy process were low and the United\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Economy"","block_context":{"text":"Economy","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=176"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/i.pinimg.com\/originals\/58\/17\/c6\/5817c67dd335de4c774acbcd42ba1d00.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":22769,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=22769","url_meta":{"origin":15074,"position":1},"title":"The EPA doesn\u2019t get it","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"November 22, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. The gnashing of teeth in Washington\u2019s bureaucracies continues. They still can\u2019t come to grips that there is a new President coming to town and his plans don\u2019t include them. One such agency is the Environmental Protection Agency. The current leadership is still deep in denial. (And not\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Economy"","block_context":{"text":"Economy","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=176"},"img":{"alt_text":"EPA-River","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/EPA-River-300x143.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":40385,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=40385","url_meta":{"origin":15074,"position":2},"title":"EPA moves to destroy the energy sector","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"May 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. If there is a department that has long since outlived it\u2019s usefulness, it\u2019s the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA has, over the decades, assumed authority it was never given, and, until recently, has been allowed to get away with. That came to an end when the Supreme\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Economy"","block_context":{"text":"Economy","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=176"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/i.pinimg.com\/originals\/74\/e0\/e5\/74e0e559d01d9ff545e998e8ebf67e5c.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":7166,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=7166","url_meta":{"origin":15074,"position":3},"title":"And the EPA strikes back!","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"March 27, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"With all the news happening today, I\u2019m sure this one will slip under the radar and no one will notice until the lights go out. What\u2019s happened this time? The EPA has once again exceeded it\u2019s authority and is imposing Carbon caps on power plants.","rel":"","context":"In "Global Warming"","block_context":{"text":"Global Warming","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=43"},"img":{"alt_text":"Energy, Jobs, Politics","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/11\/RAMFnlclr-112111-keystone-I.jpg.cms_.jpeg?fit=800%2C575&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/11\/RAMFnlclr-112111-keystone-I.jpg.cms_.jpeg?fit=800%2C575&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/11\/RAMFnlclr-112111-keystone-I.jpg.cms_.jpeg?fit=800%2C575&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/11\/RAMFnlclr-112111-keystone-I.jpg.cms_.jpeg?fit=800%2C575&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":15954,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=15954","url_meta":{"origin":15074,"position":4},"title":"The Progressive agenda of the EPA","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"September 16, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. In a series of emails that have no become public, the EPA has been shown not trying to protect the environment, but pushing the \u201cProgressive\u201d agenda down Americans throats.","rel":"","context":"In "Crime"","block_context":{"text":"Crime","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=3"},"img":{"alt_text":"something-smells-fishy-and-it-certainly-isnt-fish","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/something-smells-fishy-and-it-certainly-isnt-fish-300x225.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":22942,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=22942","url_meta":{"origin":15074,"position":5},"title":"A grown up to take over the EPA","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"December 11, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. In another bit of good news, (Good if you aren\u2019t some pointy headed Beltway bureaucrat), President-Elect Donald Trump has made his pick to be the new head of the Environmental Protection Agency.","rel":"","context":"In "Economy"","block_context":{"text":"Economy","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=176"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/EPA-River-300x143.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15074","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15074"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15074\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31989,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15074\/revisions\/31989"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15074"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15074"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15074"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}