{"id":15337,"date":"2014-06-27T13:22:30","date_gmt":"2014-06-27T17:22:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=15337"},"modified":"2022-12-25T10:22:42","modified_gmt":"2022-12-25T15:22:42","slug":"supreme-court-smackdown-round-ii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=15337","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Smackdown, Round II"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. Yesterday was an interesting day for Supreme Court decisions. They literally smacked Obama upside the head, ruling 9-0 that he had far exceeded his authority when he appointed new members to the National Labor Relations Board.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

If you don\u2019t recall the story behind that, basically Obama was trying to appoint a new board and staff it with essentially communists and union flunkies who intended to force people into unions. Since the chances of getting those moonbats through the senate approached zero, Der Fubar didn\u2019t even bother sending up their names. Instead, he waited until the Senate left town, then he declared them in recess and made what are called \u201cRecess Appointments.\u201d A recess appointment is perfectly constitutional under certain circumstances. And that\u2019s where that SCoaMF ran into trouble.<\/p>\n

President \u201cI\u2019m a Constitutional Scholar\u201d decided that HE was the one to say when the Senate was in recess, not the U.S. Senate. He put his cronies on the board and they promptly started issuing rulings that were designed to destroy companies and individual workers. Even Harry Reid had serious issues with that one. The case was not brought by the Senate, but by a company that had been ruled against by the Obama cronies. Here are some of the details from My Way<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

The Supreme Court on Thursday limited the president’s power to fill high-level vacancies with temporary appointments, ruling in favor of Senate Republicans in their partisan clash with President Barack Obama. The high court’s first-ever case involving the Constitution’s recess appointments clause ended in a unanimous decision holding that Obama’s appointments to the National Labor Relations Board in 2012 without Senate confirmation were illegal. Obama invoked the Constitution’s provision giving the president the power to make temporary appointments when the Senate is in recess. Problem is, the court said, the Senate was not actually in a formal recess when Obama acted.<\/i><\/p>\n

Obama had argued that the Senate was on an extended holiday break and that the brief sessions it held every three days \u2014 what lawmakers call “pro forma” \u2014 were a sham that was intended to prevent him from filling seats on the NLRB.<\/i><\/p>\n

The justices rejected that argument Wednesday.<\/i><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

This is a MAJOR slap at Obama. It also shows just how arrogant and incompetent he and his cronies are. This is, to my limited knowledge, the first time the court has ruled on a separation of powers and what powers a president has. (Others far more knowledgeable then I am can speak to this) For decades presidents have tried to avoid cases like this ending up in front of the Supreme Court, usually working out some sort of deal with Congress. What Obama has done is destroy that \u201carrangement\u201d for himself and future presidents with his refusal to talk to Congress and basically act as if he were the king.<\/p>\n

\"king<\/a><\/p>\n

Now what does this mean right now? It means that all those ruling made by the NLRB during the period the Recess Appointees were in place are essentially invalid and illegal. Here are some details on what might happen now from Fox News<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

The Supreme Court ruling on Thursday that invalidated three appointments made by President Obama to the National Labor Relations Board has thrown hundreds of the board’s decisions into question. The board that rules on labor disputes is now scrambling to determine the impact of the high court decision. At issue is whether board decisions made when the now-invalid appointees were participating will have to be re-decided under the current NLRB. <\/i><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

I think I can safely say that Yes, they WILL have to rehear all those cases.<\/p>\n

\n

By one count, more than 430 cases could be in doubt, including a decision to protect workers from being fired for complaining about their companies on social media sites. <\/i><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

I don\u2019t know anything about that last case, but I have been terminated due to Anger Central<\/a> in the past, even though I had made no mention of what I did or the company I worked for. Needless to say, a decision saying they can\u2019t do that is something I would probably support.<\/p>\n

Board Chairman Mark Gaston Pearce put out a brief statement on Thursday acknowledging the possibility these cases will have to be revisited. <\/i><\/p>\n

\n

“We are analyzing the impact that the Court’s decision has on Board cases in which the January 2012 recess appointees participated,” he said. “The Agency is committed to resolving any cases affected by today’s decision as expeditiously as possible.” <\/i><\/p>\n

He noted that the board, as it’s now constituted, has five Senate-confirmed members. But that was not the case between January 2012 and mid-2013, when the board contained members whom the Supreme Court has determined were improperly appointed. <\/i><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\"double-facepalm\"<\/a><\/p>\n

You know, all this could have been avoided if King Putt had simply followed the constitution and submitted his choices to the Senate for confirmation. But Nooo, he thought the constitution and the laws don\u2019t apply to His Majesty and now he has just received the judicial equivalent of a 2×4 to the back of the head.<\/p>\n

And finally, in a stunningly tone deaf statement, Harry Reid had this to say<\/a> on the decision:<\/p>\n

\n

Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) blamed Senate Republicans for denying nominees a chance to be confirmed through a vote of the full chamber. \u201cPresident Obama did the right thing when he made these appointments on behalf of American workers,\u201d Reid said in a statement.<\/i><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\"reid-stup2\"<\/a><\/p>\n

That corrupt moron knows that the reason these appointments were made in an illegal manner was not due to Republican intransigence, but due to his Lord and Master not bothering to even submit the names to the Senate. Now perhaps they would have been blocked, perhaps not. But to say that it\u2019s all the Republican\u2019s fault when it\u2019s Obama\u2019s demonstrates why Reid is utterly unfit for anything other then an ankle bracelet tracking device<\/a>. Well, unless the Party of Stupid blows the 2014 midterms, Reid is out as majority leader, and with this decision, Obama won\u2019t be able to appoint his radical cronies to any new positions.<\/p>\n

Thatisall<\/p>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n

\"1\"2\"3\"4\"5 (1<\/strong> votes, average: 5.00<\/strong> out of 5)
<\/span><\/span>Loading...<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Supreme Court limits recess appointments<\/a><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
Looking at the sheer numbers, the Obama administration has issued fewer signing statements, made fewer recess appointments and been embroiled in fewer real scandals than previous executive branches. At the same time, he has been …<\/div>\n
http:\/\/www.cioediting.com\/wordpress\/<\/a> \u2014 Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:27:53 -0700<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Supreme Court Rules Obama’s 2012 NLRB Recess …<\/a><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
By: Judy Greenwald (Business Insurance) June 2014. The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday held that three appointments to the National Labor Relations Board made by President Barack Obama in January 2012 while Congress was between …<\/div>\n
http:\/\/www.capstonebrokerage.com\/<\/a> \u2014 Fri, 27 Jun 2014 08:34:09 -0700<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Krauthammer: If Obama Was A Republican He’d Already Be …<\/a><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
On Thursday evening Krauthammer spoke with Fox News’ Greta van Susteren about the 9-0 Supreme Court decision overturning the president’s three \u201crecess\u201d appointments to the National Labor Relations Board in defiance of the Senate.<\/div>\n
http:\/\/dailycaller.com\/<\/a> \u2014 Fri, 27 Jun 2014 08:28:37 -0700<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

u.s. supreme court invalidates obama’s nlrb recess …<\/a><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
After the District of Columbia Circuit Court sided with Noel Canning, the Supreme Court affirmed, and ruled on the Board’s appeal that the three recess appointments President Obama made to the NLRB in January 2012 were indeed …<\/div>\n
http:\/\/www.sjlaboremploymentblog.com\/<\/a> \u2014 Fri, 27 Jun 2014 08:26:33 -0700<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Civil Human Rights Coalition Responds to Recess …<\/a><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. Scott Simpson. 202.466.2061. simpson@civilrights.org. June 25, 2014. WASHINGTON — Wade Henderson, president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, issued the following statement in response to the Supreme Court’s ruling in NLRB v. Noel Canning, which limited but upheld the president’s recess appointment power: … Full Story: http:\/\/www.civilrights.org\/press\/2014\/noel-canning-nlrb.html.<\/div>\n
http:\/\/affirmact.blogspot.com\/<\/a> \u2014 Fri, 27 Jun 2014 08:16:00 -0700<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

The Supreme Court UNANIMOUSLY Rules That Obama’s …<\/a><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
… administration lately, with scandal after scandal haunting them. And unfortunately for our Dear Leader, it doesn’t look to be getting better: the Supreme Court just unanimously ruled that his recess appointments were an abuse of power.<\/div>\n
http:\/\/www.rightwingnews.com\/<\/a> \u2014 Fri, 27 Jun 2014 08:14:47 -0700<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Judge Napolitano Weighs In on SCOTUS Recess …<\/a><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
Judge Andrew Napolitano weighed in this morning after the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that President Obama exceeded his authority with his recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board. It was the first-ever Supreme …<\/div>\n
http:\/\/foxnewsinsider.com\/about\/<\/a> \u2014 Fri, 27 Jun 2014 08:07:00 -0700<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

The Supreme Court is not nearly as divided as you may …<\/a><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
What would you say if I told you that the current session of the U.S. Supreme Court has seen the highest rate of unanimity among the nine justices in 74 years? Sounds counter-intuitive, right? The conventional wisdom is that the high court is at …<\/div>\n
http:\/\/blogs.e-rockford.com\/applesauce\/<\/a> \u2014 Fri, 27 Jun 2014 07:49:56 -0700<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Good day all. Yesterday was an interesting day for Supreme Court decisions. They literally smacked Obama upside the head, ruling 9-0 that he had far exceeded his authority when he appointed new members to the National Labor Relations Board. Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[135,37,71,8,35],"tags":[52,134,18,8,110,235,27,35],"class_list":["post-15337","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-just-desserts","category-liberty-politics","category-news-of-the-day","category-politics","category-tyranny","tag-constitution","tag-king-putt","tag-obama","tag-politics","tag-scoamf","tag-supreme-court","tag-totalitarianism","tag-tyranny"],"views":1182,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":10699,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=10699","url_meta":{"origin":15337,"position":0},"title":"Courts bitch slap Obama","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"January 25, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"There\u2019s some breaking news today regarding Der Fubar\u2019s recess appointments to several agencies. At the time the appointments were made, the Senate was not out of session. This led to a number of suits demanding that the appointments be vacated as illegal.","rel":"","context":"In "Just Desserts"","block_context":{"text":"Just Desserts","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=135"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/01\/Obama-burning-constitution.jpg?fit=484%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":11772,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=11772","url_meta":{"origin":15337,"position":1},"title":"Strike TWO for the NLRB","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"May 16, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"Back in 2012, President \u201cKnows Nothing\u201d decided on his own that Congress was in Recess and appointed three members to fill opening on the National Labor Relations Board. These three were so blatantly in the tank for the Unions, that they weren\u2019t even brought to the floor of the senate\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Politics"","block_context":{"text":"Politics","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=8"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/09\/union-thug-300x207.jpg?fit=300%2C207&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":23145,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=23145","url_meta":{"origin":15337,"position":2},"title":"Obama\u2019s last strike against America?","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"January 2, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. When Donald Trump is sworn in on the 20th, one of the first things he will have to do is appoint a new supreme court justice to replace the late Antonin Scalia.","rel":"","context":"In "Moonbat"","block_context":{"text":"Moonbat","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=100"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Donald-Trump-300x214.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":6192,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=6192","url_meta":{"origin":15337,"position":3},"title":"Once Again, Obama demonstrates his contempt for America","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"January 4, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"Well now it\u2019s been a busy day for that scumbag Obama. He has once again shown that as far as he is concerned, the Rule of Law and the Constitution mean nothing to him.","rel":"","context":"In "Crime"","block_context":{"text":"Crime","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=3"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":20411,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=20411","url_meta":{"origin":15337,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia dead","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"February 13, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. Well it isn't good at all. Justice Antonin Scalia has died at the age of 79. He was at the Cibolo Creek Ranch in Texas and died of natural causes.","rel":"","context":"In "Hero"","block_context":{"text":"Hero","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=181"},"img":{"alt_text":"Stock Photo of the Consitution of the United States and Feather Quill","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/07\/constitution-300x198.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":20416,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=20416","url_meta":{"origin":15337,"position":5},"title":"Who will be the next Supreme Court Justice?","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"February 14, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. With the passing of Justice Scalia yesterday, the question of the hour is, \u201cWho will be the next justice to the United States Supreme Court?\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "General"","block_context":{"text":"General","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=32"},"img":{"alt_text":"keystone-cop","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/keystone-cop-300x246.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15337","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15337"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15337\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":39407,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15337\/revisions\/39407"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15337"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15337"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15337"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}