{"id":15591,"date":"2014-07-31T15:32:26","date_gmt":"2014-07-31T19:32:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=15591"},"modified":"2021-11-10T05:24:31","modified_gmt":"2021-11-10T10:24:31","slug":"justice-ginsburg-plans-on-dying-on-the-bench","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=15591","title":{"rendered":"Justice Ginsburg plans on dying on the bench"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. Here\u2019s something a little different for a change. Recently, there have been calls for Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to step down and retire. Ginsburg has stated that she\u2019s planning on staying put.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Now, why the calls for the old (Moon) Bat to retire? I\u2019m thinking that the PLFD\u2019s are getting a little nervous regarding the 2016 presidential election, and are concerned that the next president might just be a republican and might actually appoint justices who, horror of horrors, support the Constitution of the United states! By the time the next President takes office, Ginsburg will be 83 years old. (And showing every year of it too)<\/p>\n

That is the only reason they want Ginsburg to sail off into senility<\/i><\/span> the sunset. They want Obama to be able to appoint another justice who despises the constitution ((Justice Ginsburg causes storm dissing the Constitution while abroad<\/a>)) as much as he does, and who will be on the bench wrecking havoc for decades to come. Of course, this doesn\u2019t take into account the ego of a supreme court justice. Here are a few details from The Hill<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has not changed her tune on retirement in the past year, saying Wednesday she plans to stay for \u201ca while.\u201d <\/i><\/p>\n

“My answer is, I will do this job as long as I can do it full steam,” she told <\/i>Yahoo News<\/i><\/a><\/strong>. “When I feel myself slipping. When I can no longer think as sharply, write as quickly, that will be the time for me to leave the court.” <\/i><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\"double-facepalm\"<\/a><\/p>\n

I gather Ginsburg feels that as long as she can have a nice nap-time ((Ginsburg Asleep at the Bench)) during arguments, she is just fine.<\/p>\n

\n

Some liberals have urged her to retire so President Obama could nominate a successor while Democrats control the Senate. <\/i><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\"Barking<\/a><\/p>\n

So the moonbats are pushing a weak member out of the herd are they? Gee, what a surprise, NOT! Of course, since it isn\u2019t politically correct to push an elderly moonbat under the bus, they are sort of stuck. It doesn\u2019t help when you have the target of their interest telling them she isn\u2019t going.<\/p>\n

\n

When asked if the politics of naming a successor should factor into her decision, she said, “All I can say, I am still here and likely to remain for a while.” She said she models her tenure after former Justice Louis Brandeis, who was appointed at 60 and stayed until he was 83. <\/i><\/p>\n

“I expect to stay at least that long,” Ginsburg, 81, said. She would be 83 in March 2016.<\/i><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\"suck<\/a><\/p>\n

Now if that isn’t a “Take your retirement and shove it where the sun don’t shine” response, I don’t know what is. As for the moonbats, why do I have this image running through my head?<\/p>\n

[youtuber youtube=’http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=1gQrqHDBQ4o’]<\/p>\n

Yep, that\u2019s just how moonbats prefer to do things. Of course, if Ginsburg were to suffer a sudden smothering accident with a pillow, Obama would still need to get someone through the senate confirmation process. Then there is the very likely filibuster by the Republicans. At least there will be a filibuster until Dingy Harry Reid kills it for Supreme Court nominees the way he did for everything else ((Dirty Harry’s hypocritical killing of the filibuster helped stack federal courts with liberal partisans<\/a>)). Still, it would just keep things at a 4-4 tie with Kennedy ((Anthony McLeod Kennedy<\/a>)) as the swing vote.<\/p>\n

Frankly Ginsburg should have gone some time ago. Pointedly, I think she should have been removed for cause when she badmouthed the Constitution that she is sworn to uphold. I\u2019m srot of hoping the old bag does hold on until 2016 so that the next President, hopefully a Constitutionalist Republican or Independent, can put someone on the bench who has actually read the thing.<\/p>\n

Thatisall<\/p>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n

\"1\"2\"3\"4\"5 (2<\/strong> votes, average: 5.00<\/strong> out of 5)
<\/span><\/span>Loading...<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Good day all. Here\u2019s something a little different for a change. Recently, there have been calls for Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to step down and retire. Ginsburg has stated that she\u2019s planning on staying put. Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[32,100,8,219],"tags":[52,90,235],"class_list":["post-15591","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general","category-moonbat","category-politics","category-the-good-idea-fairy","tag-constitution","tag-moonbattery","tag-supreme-court"],"views":959,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":24020,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=24020","url_meta":{"origin":15591,"position":0},"title":"Bader-Ginsburg gets one right","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"April 13, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. Supreme Court justice, Ruth Bader-Ginsburg has not been treated kindly by me, and deservedly so. She is wrong in her decisions far more often then she is right. However, once in a great while, she gets something right. In this case, it was her references to Senator\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Humor"","block_context":{"text":"Humor","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=6"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/dont-confuse-300x232.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":21685,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=21685","url_meta":{"origin":15591,"position":1},"title":"Ruth Bader-Ginsburg \u201cRegrets\u201d","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"July 14, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all, it\u2019s been rather a busy day today. Yesterday I posted about Supreme Court Justice and senile old Moonbat Ruth Bader-Ginsburg tee\u2019ing off on Donald Trump. Ruth Bader-Ginsburg was hammered from all sides on her remarks, including from notable conservative publications like the New York Times and the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "General"","block_context":{"text":"General","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=32"},"img":{"alt_text":"Barking Moonbat","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/02\/barking_moonbat3.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":21673,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=21673","url_meta":{"origin":15591,"position":2},"title":"Ruth Bader-Ginsburg jumps the shark","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"July 13, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader-Ginsburg, after knifing the late Antonin Scalia in the back, decided to demonstrate why she is unfit to be on the bench. She entered into the political realm and went after Donald Trump The Supreme Court, actually all the judges in all the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Moonbat"","block_context":{"text":"Moonbat","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=100"},"img":{"alt_text":"headdesk","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/headdesk-300x225.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":23999,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=23999","url_meta":{"origin":15591,"position":3},"title":"The Constitution has been saved","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"April 10, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. Today, a new Associate Justice to the United States Supreme Court will be sworn in. Neil Gorsuch will replace the late, great justice Antonin Scalia, returning the Supreme Court to a general 5-4 majority in favor of the Constitution of the United States of America.","rel":"","context":"In "Hero"","block_context":{"text":"Hero","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=181"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/useagle3.gif?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":31744,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=31744","url_meta":{"origin":15591,"position":4},"title":"Who is going to replace Ruth Bader-Ginsburg?","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"September 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. Now that the Notorious Ruth Bader-Ginsburg has assumed room temperature, the question arises, \u201cWho is President Trump going to select as his nominee for the Supreme Court? Among the criteria is the nominee must be a true scholar of the Constitution, The Bill of Rights and be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hero"","block_context":{"text":"Hero","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=181"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/i.pinimg.com\/originals\/2a\/12\/af\/2a12afad6c4739f7e3c13bcfddd3965a.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":28611,"url":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=28611","url_meta":{"origin":15591,"position":5},"title":"Democrats forget the 1st rule. Never ask a question you don\u2019t already have the answer to","author":"Angry Webmaster","date":"May 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Good day all. Once again, the Progressives, liberals, Democrats and CommuNazis, (Yes, I know, repeating myself again), proved what all normal people already know. They are morons. Recently, the Democrats opened a nice, non-scientific poll on Twitter. The question? Which would you prefer on the Supreme Court. More Kavanaughs or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Just Desserts"","block_context":{"text":"Just Desserts","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?cat=135"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/Typical-Democrat-Voter.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15591","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15591"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15591\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35913,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15591\/revisions\/35913"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15591"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15591"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15591"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}