![\"head_up_ass\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/head_up_ass.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Thanks to Gutless McConnell and Crybaby Boehner, what should have been a simple move to stop Obama’s illegal actions instead became yet another defeat snatched from the jaws of victory. Now the PLFD’s led by Comrade Senator Charles \u201cUpchuck\u201d Schumer are demanding more of the same crap they’ve been shoving down America’s throats for decades. Here are some of the details from The Washington Times<\/a>:<\/p>\n Emboldened by winning the shutdown showdown over homeland security, and poised to triumph on raising the debt limit, Senate<\/a> Democrats set their sights Thursday on the budget sequesters, demanding that Republicans hike taxes and raise spending.<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Yeah, they’ve just learned that what the voters wanted and expected from the Republicans, won’t happen with the Establishment RINO’s running things. Gutless and Crybaby can’t wait to run up the white flags and give the PLFD’s whatever they want.<\/p>\n It was a shot across the bow for Republican budget writers, who are set to unveil their proposals next week, which are expected to further slash spending and balance the budget in 10 years \u2014 slowing the growth of runaway national debt that currently tops $18 trillion.<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n The PLFD’s have shown that they have no interest in the economic health of the United States. They really don’t care if the whole house of cards collapses. It’s that or they are so delusional that they really don’t believe that a collapse will happen.<\/p>\n Senate<\/a> Democrats insisted that keeping the automatic spending cuts would jeopardize the economic recovery, hurt the middle class and weaken the U.S. military. And they warned Republicans that President Obama will reject any budget sent to him that does not increase spending on both defense and domestic programs.<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Ok, allow me to disassemble this idiocy. First, the PLFD’s have been gutting the military for decades, and have opposed anything that might actually strengthen our defenses. As to the \u201cEconomic Recovery,\u201d we all know that’s garbage. Almost a third of Americans are out of work and can’t find a job or have given up looking. Salaries have been static for almost two decades. (and yes, I blame Bush for part of that) As for the domestic programs? Why not call those what they are? Stealing money from people who are working and giving it to bureaucrats, PLFD cronies and the worthless class. (Worthless defined as those quite capable of working but are to lazy to get a job)<\/p>\n \u201cThe president has been very clear: He will not accept a budget that locks in sequester, and he will not accept a budget that severs that vital link between defense and nondefense spending,\u201d said Shaun L.S. Donovan<\/a>, the director of the president\u2019s Office of Management and Budget, who joined Democrats at a Capitol Hill press conference to make the demands. <\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Barack Obama is personally responsible for the doubling of the National Debt. Spending started going out of control right after the PLFD’s gained control of both houses of Congress back in 2007. We are at unsustainable levels of spending right now and these moonbats want more.<\/p>\n Mr. Donovan<\/a> boasted that the spending scheme supported by Mr. Obama and his Democrats makes investments in infrastructure, manufacturing and education. <\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n No it doesn’t. We’ve been down this road already under Der Fubar and saw just what he spent the money on. Paying off PLFD cronies like Unions. As for \u201cInfrastructure,\u201d yes, we need to work on roads and bridges, but the days of handing someone a shovel and sending them out ended decades ago. That kind of work is highly specialized and there simply aren’t enough trained people available for the work we need. As for Education? I think the term would be \u201cReinforcing failure.\u201d<\/p>\n The hallmark of the Democrats\u2019 plan was increasing spending by equal amounts for both defense and nondefense programs, which was the same formula used in Mr. Obama\u2019s budget proposal last month. <\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Yep, the usual PLFD manure.<\/p>\n \u201cThe cuts on both sides of the ledger \u2014 on defense and nondefense \u2014 are harmful, unnecessary and avoidable with just a little bit of cooperation from some of our colleagues,\u201d said Sen. Charles E. Schumer<\/a>, New York Democrat and his party\u2019s No. 3 leader in the Senate<\/a>, who led the press conference. <\/i><\/p>\n The only thing I agree with Upchuck on are defense cuts. We need to increase spending significantly. All the rest of his wish list? I’m thinking that in many cases, a zero’d out budget would be appropriate.<\/p>\n Based on news reports about budgets being drafted by the Republican majorities in both chambers, Mr. Schumer<\/a> said the spending levels would \u201ctighten the noose around our economic recovery.\u201d<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Typical of socialists everywhere, Upchuck seems to think taking money from productive people and wasting it on government boondoggles is good for the economy.<\/p>\n \u201cThey are preparing to take a meat cleaver to programs that create jobs through infrastructure and scientific research, as well as programs within the Defense Department that keep us safe,\u201d he said. \u201cRather than taking a scalpel to cut out wasteful spending or working with Democrats to find revenue by closing egregious loopholes, Republicans would rather lop the top off programs that create jobs and grow the economy.\u201d <\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Yep, just as I thought. He thinks the only worthwhile job is a government job. Since he’s never worked in the \u201cDreaded Private Sector\u201d as far as I know, let alone run a business or met a payroll, I’m not surprised. Now they want to use the typical Democrat talking points to get what they want. Fear and terror. Just like the lies they used on the cowards McConnell and Boehner.<\/p>\n \u201cSequestration is an enemy of our nation in two important ways,\u201d said Sen. Claire McCaskill, Missouri Democrat. \u201cFirst, it compromises our national security because it handcuffs our ability to fund our military. The second way that sequestration is an enemy to our country is in our competitiveness. We must be able to compete globally, and to compete globally we must be able to invest in research and technology.\u201d <\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n The PLFD’s and their pals, the Establishment RINO’s have forgotten who won the last election. Here’s a hint. It wasn’t the PLFD’s. Their policies have been thoroughly rejected. The problem we have now is the Establishment RINO’s still can’t understand why they were put in the majority. It wasn’t to roll over and cave in to the PLFD’s, it was to reverse the damage done to the Constitution, the economy and the very freedom of the American People.<\/p>\n If they continue rolling over and surrendering, they will either be voted out in the next election, or people might decide it’s time to hit the Second Amendment Reset button. If that happens, then this country is finished because the American People will have given up on the American Constitutional system. As it is, more and more people either outright fear the Federal Government or consider the Federal Government to be a threat to our Freedom and liberty<\/a>. And therein lies the problem. The PLFD’s are the party of Evil and Totalitarianism, so they don’t give a damn. The Establishment RINO’s are to stupid and incompetent to understand that things need to change.<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n