![\"shooting](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/09\/shooting-fish-in-a-barrel.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
I’m not going into the details of what happened. There are plenty of people and news services already on the case. No, I’m going to talk about how the Progressive Liberal Fascists, primarily Democrats, have taken what happened and instantly demanded more laws designed to suppress the Constitutional rights of the People.<\/p>\n
Right off the bat, literally before the remains of the dead had cooled, Obama started saying that he wasn’t giving up on gun control. According to the Washington Times<\/a>:<\/p>\n President Obama said Friday he isn\u2019t surrendering on gun-control efforts. <\/i>\u201cI\u2019m not resigned,\u201d Mr. Obama told the U.S. Conference of Mayors in San Francisco. \u201cI have faith we will eventually do the right thing.\u201d<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n This from the man who sold guns to Mexican drug gangs that are responsible for the deaths of hundreds of Mexican men, women and children as well as a United States border agent. Being Obama, he promptly lied through his teeth.<\/p>\n \u201cWe have to stop being confused about this,\u201d he said. \u201cYou don\u2019t see murder on this kind of scale, this kind of frequency in any other advanced nation on Earth. I refuse to act as if this is the new normal, or to pretend that it\u2019s simply sufficient to grieve, and that any mention of us doing something to stop is somehow politicizing the problem.\u201d<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Within hours people started posting the actual statistics from Europe, not to mention what’s going on in the Middle East on mass shootings. Right off the bat we have Anders Behring Breivik<\/a> who slaughtered 77 people in Norway. As I recall, there was at least one police officer there but he was unarmed. Then we have the recent Charlie Hebdo shootings in France. Then we have Cankles Clinton. She’s always wanted to confiscate firearms from the \u201cPeons and Serfs.\u201d That corrupt cow had this to say yesterday<\/a>. (June 20)<\/p>\n Issuing an emotional plea following the South Carolina church shooting, Hillary Rodham Clinton<\/a> called for \u201ccommon-sense\u201d gun reforms and a national reckoning with the persistent problem of \u201cinstitutional racism.\u201d<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n First, I want to challenge Cankles to show me where the words, \u201cCommon Sense\u201d are in the Second Amendment. For people like Clinton, common sens gun control means bans and confiscations. As to this utter Bullsh** about \u201cInstitutional Racism,\u201d the overwhelming majority of racism today exists on the political left.<\/p>\n Regulations, she said, can be passed while still respecting the Second Amendment and \u201crespecting responsible gun owners.\u201d <\/i>\u201cThe politics on this issue have been poisoned, but we can\u2019t give up,\u201d she told the U.S. Conference of Mayors in San Francisco on Saturday. \u201cThe stakes are too high. The costs are too dear.\u201d<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n The PLFD’s have absolutely no respect for gun owners. They have no respect for the Second Amendment, hate the First Amendment, and have real problems with with the Constitution in general. They refuse to accept that the people have spoken and that most Americans support the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. Every single attempt in the last 15 years to impose restrictions on gun owners has failed, both in the legislatures of most states as well as in the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n Now it’s come out that the church was a \u201cGun Free Zone,\u201d meaning that no one was allowed to bring a gun in. As has come out since the capture of the criminal, his original target was a university, but due to the armed security, he decided it would be easier to shoot up a church since by law, churches are gun free zones. According to the Daily Caller<\/a>:<\/p>\n The Charleston, S.C., church massacre is already drawing comparisons to the tragedies at the Sandy Hook School in Newtown, Conn., and at a movie theater in Aurora, Colo. because it happened in a gun-free zone.<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Although South Carolina is one of several states around the country that issue concealed carry licenses on a \u201cshall issue\u201d basis, legal gun owners are not permitted to carry their firearms into places of worship.<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n According to South Carolina law<\/a>, civilians may not carry their legal fire arms \u201con school premises (including day care and preschool facilities), in law enforcement offices or facilities, in court facilities, at polling places on election days, in churches or other religious sanctuaries, or in hospitals or medical facilities. (S.C. Code Ann.\u00a7 23-31-215.)\u201d <\/i>The penalties for carrying a firearm in such places include a fine of at least $1,000, up to one year in jail, or both. <\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Actually, the penalty for people who obeyed this law is death by murderous scum sicking scum. I don’t know if anyone in that church had a carry permit. It doesn’t matter since the people in that church were and are decent law abiding citizens. This is just fine for the PLFD’s. They are horrified at the thought of people being able to defend themselves. Here are details, once again from the Washington Times<\/a>:<\/p>\n \u201cNow I cannot imagine the horror that could have occurred if people were sitting around with concealed weapons, this thing started, and you have a full-scale gunfight,\u201d said Democratic advisor Bob Shrum<\/a> on Friday\u2019s episode of MSNBC<\/a>\u2019s \u201cThe Ed Show.\u201d <\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n \u201cYou might not even have three survivors,\u201d said Mr. Shrum<\/a>, a top campaign aide to now-Secretary of State John Kerry during his failed 2004 presidential bid.<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Bob Shrum is a moron. He’s also dead wrong with regards to armed parishioners as repeated incidents have shown. Perhaps Mr. Shrum might want to speak with Jeanne Assam. She was attending church when a scumsucker came in and opened fire. She drew her gun and plugged the criminal, who then shot himself.<\/p>\n Even though the Mostly Stupid Media does all it can to suppress reports of armed citizens stopping mass shootings, the news still gets out. We see reports all the time of armed citizens stopping criminals and the occasional psycho bent on doing harm. The problem for the MSM is that it doesn’t fit the narrative that \u201cGuns are evil and must be banned!\u201d so they ignore any reports of crimes being stopped.<\/p>\n As I said earlier, the people have spoken and the polls show it. Recently, (June 12), Rasmussen came out with a poll<\/a> that most people prefer being in a neighborhood where people can have guns:<\/p>\n American Voters overwhelming prefer living in a neighborhood where they have the option of owning a gun than to live where nobody is allowed to be armed. <\/i>A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 22% of Likely U.S. Voters would feel safer living in a neighborhood where nobody was allowed to own a gun over one where they could have a gun for their own protection. Sixty-eight percent (68%) would feel safer in a neighborhood where guns are allowed, while 10% are not sure. (To see survey question wording, click here<\/a>.)<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n As we know, the PLFD’s refuse to listen to the serfs and peons. If they could pull it off, they would order the outright confiscation of all privately owned firearms. They fail to understand what the results would be if they tried unleashing the Federal Government’s resources on the citizens. Allow me to speculate.<\/p>\n First, 70 percent, give or take, of state and local law enforcement would refuse to carry out the orders. Why? Basically, they don’t want to get killed. On the Federal level, it’s a bit different, but I doubt more than 50 percent of Federal Agents would comply. If they tried to unleash the military, there’s a fair chance of outright mutinies and the troops moving on the Political Class instead.<\/p>\n Of course, that is all just a worse case scenario, but the gun grabbers truly believe that if they pass laws banning guns, then magically, all guns will just go away. This is the same mindset that that thinks people should not be allowed to defend themselves if they are attacked. Well, I’m sorry, but if someone comes after me, my family or my neighbors, I’ll do whatever I need to with whatever tools I require to protect them. I’m not alone in this sort of thinking, as you can see from Rasmussen.<\/p>\n Thatisall<\/p>\n ~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n [yasr_visitor_votes size=”medium”]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Good day all. Last week, a scumsucking racist dirtbag walked into a church in Charleston, South Carolina and gunned down 9 innocent worshipers. The good news in this dark business is the police caught this bastard. The bad news is … Continue reading <\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n