![\"Hillary](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/Hillary-for-Prison.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
It’s well known that the Clinton Foundation pretty much exists for the enrichment of the Clintons. There are those who will argue the point of course, and they are free to do so, however it’s always seemed a bit on the shady side. Now the FBI is looking into the possibility that then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton may have basically sold her office. Here are the details exclusive from Fox News<\/a>:<\/p>\n The FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton\u2019s use of private email as secretary of state has expanded to look at whether the possible \u201cintersection\u201d of Clinton Foundation work and State Department business may have violated public corruption laws, three intelligence sources not authorized to speak on the record told Fox News. <\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n “The agents are investigating the possible intersection of Clinton Foundation donations, the dispensation of State Department contracts and whether regular processes were followed,” one source said. The development follows press reports over the past year about the potential overlap of State Department and Clinton Foundation work, and questions over whether donors benefited from their contacts inside the administration. <\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Oh I think it might be a safe bet. There is this story from that well known conservative newspaper, the New York Times regarding how Russia managed to acquire ownership<\/a> of a significant amount of the uranium mines in the United States.<\/p>\n Inside the FBI, pressure is growing to pursue the case. One intelligence source told Fox News that FBI agents would be \u201cscreaming\u201d if a prosecution is not pursued because \u201cmany previous public corruption cases have been made and successfully prosecuted with much less evidence than what is emerging in this investigation.\u201d<\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n They are forgetting that Hillary Clinton is one of the \u201cBeautiful People\u201d and therefore the laws that apply to everyone else, don’t apply to her.<\/p>\n The FBI is particularly on edge in the wake of how the case of former CIA Director David Petraeus was handled. <\/b>One of the three sources said some FBI agents felt Petraeus was given a slap on the wrist for sharing highly classified information with his mistress and biographer Paula Broadwell, as well as lying to FBI agents about his actions. Petraeus pled guilty to a misdemeanor in March 2015 after a two-plus-year federal investigation in which Attorney General Eric Holder initially declined to prosecute.<\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n That was a pretty big mess Petraues got himself into, thinking with his reproductive system instead of his brain. There’s always been a feeling out there that if this had gone to trial, things that made Obama look really bad might have come out, and Holder just swept this all under the carpet. However, the information Petraeus leaked didn’t go very far.<\/p>\n In the Petraeus case, the exposure of classified information was assessed to be limited. <\/b>By contrast, in the Clinton case, the number of classified emails has risen to at least 1,340. A 2015 appeal by the State Department to challenge the \u201cTop Secret\u201d classification of at least two emails failed and, as Fox News first reported<\/a>, is now considered a settled matter.<\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Among the things they are looking into is whether or not Cankles bathroom mail server might have been hacked by foreign powers. Considering the total lack of any security on it, the moment that any nation discovered it, they would have assaulted it with everything they had. This is one of the reasons Congress has been looking into this. Now though, it’s suddenly looking a lot worse for Queen Cankles Clinton.<\/p>\n Fox News is told that about 100 special agents assigned to the investigations also were asked to sign non-disclosure agreements, with as many as 50 additional agents on \u201ctemporary duty assignment,\u201d or TDY. The request to sign a new NDA could reflect that agents are handling the highly classified material in the emails, or serve as a reminder not to leak about the case, or both. <\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Or it may be to keep them from writing books on this fiasco if Attorney General Lynch decides to sweep this one under the rug as well. Needless to say, the Cankled One is still denying that she did anything wrong.<\/p>\n On Sunday, when asked about her email practices while secretary of state, Clinton insisted to CBS News\u2019 “Face The Nation,” “there is no there, there.” <\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n I wonder if she is working on a potential diminished capacity defense? It’s becoming obvious to the general public that Hillary Clinton didn’t just break the laws, she nuked them. The only question remaining now, is when will the grand jury indictments be handed down?<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n