![\"Hillary](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/Hillary-Clinton1.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
In this case, it was the Boston Globe issuing the endorsement. The Globe, or as it is known in the region, \u201cEl Globo,\u201d thinks Cankles would be just peachy as president. Here is what passes for reasoning from the Bow tied Bum kissers on the Editorial Board of the Boston Globe<\/a>:<\/p>\n America looks different in 2016 than it did the last time Hillary Clinton ran for president: The economy has come out of free fall, the military has left the quagmire of the Iraq war, barriers to equality have toppled, and universal access to health care has become a reality. Tumultuous as they\u2019ve been, the Barack Obama years have proved transformative \u2014 and the priority for Democratic voters should be to protect, consolidate, and extend those gains.<\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n I think whatever the Editorial Board is consuming, it isn’t legal in this country.<\/p>\n Today, the nation has new challenges, which require a different kind of leader,<\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Would that be one who isn’t looking at a felony indictment?<\/p>\n someone who can keep what Obama got right,<\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Which is pretty much nothing<\/p>\n while also fixing his failures, especially on gun control and immigration reform. <\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Obama’s failures are across the board. However, on gun control, El Globo’s bum kissers want total confiscation. While they like some of what Obama has done on immigration, the borders haven’t been thrown open far enough to suit them. The costs of their gardeners from Mexico is still higher than they like to pay.<\/p>\n That will require a focus and toughness that Obama sometimes lacked.<\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Oh I think Obama had plenty of focus. He focused on wrecking the American economy, destroying our relations with allied nations and kowtowing to our enemies. And he was quite tough on the golf course.<\/p>\n This is Clinton\u2019s time,<\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n No, actually, it isn’t.<\/p>\n and the Globe enthusiastically endorses her in the Feb. 9 Democratic primary in New Hampshire. She is more seasoned, more grounded, and more forward-looking than in 2008, and has added four years as secretary of state to her already formidable resume. Democrats in the Granite State should not hesitate to choose her. <\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n I fully agree, although I think I’ll make a few changes here. Instead of \u201cSeasoned,\u201d I would suggest \u201cCorrupt.\u201d Her four years as Secretary of state will go down in history as four wasted years. All she accomplished was destabilizing the Middle East. Her successor, John \u201cLiveshot\u201d Kerry has already surpassed her in shear ineptitude and incompetence.<\/p>\n As the recent spate of mass shootings has made tragically clear, the next president will face a crisis of gun violence. Firearms killed more than 33,000 Americans<\/a> in 2013. The intransigence of Congressional Republicans who\u2019ve blocked reform can hardly be blamed on Obama, but it has become clear that he won\u2019t be able to make a dent in the problem before leaving office.<\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Pesky thing, that Constitution of the United States and that obviously antiquated 2nd<\/sup> Amendment. I’m sure your candidate will promptly discard that useless amendment and issue the order for a full confiscation of all privately held firearms.<\/p>\n Clinton promises to close the kind of loopholes that allowed killers like Dylann Roof to obtain weapons, and to lift restrictions on federally funded research into gun violence. She also supports reimposing the federal ban on assault weapons, which expired under George W. Bush. <\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n What loopholes? Oh wait! There aren’t any! As to that \u201cfederally funded research\u201d that requires an act of congress. You know, appropriating funds and all. There is a reason they’ve been rejecting it. It turned out that the reports they had done were worthless.<\/p>\n And as to banning \u201cAssault Weapons,\u201d, there isn’t any such thing. In case you haven’t noticed, and I fully understand that selecting the right Chablis to go with your cheese does take your full concentration, when the last one was pushed through by your \u201cDear beloved husband\u201d it cost the Democrats the congress. Additionally, the American people have decided that the 2nd<\/sup> Amendment means what it says and they have been voting with their wallets, big time.<\/p>\n Immigration reform also eluded the Obama White House \u2014 in part because the president himself made it a low priority early in his term. On this issue, Sanders, Clinton, and the third Democratic candidate, former Maryland governor Martin O\u2019Malley, all seem to be on roughly the same page. It\u2019s inexcusable that 11 million Americans are working in the shadows. Illegal immigrants mow your lawn, and wash your dishes at restaurants. They need a reasonable pathway to legalization and eventual citizenship. <\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Oh brother! Right off the bat, these are not Americans. They are whatever nationality they come from prior to their entering the United States illegally. Even those people who do come here from other countries in a lawful manner, (Such as the former Mrs. Webmaster), are not Americans.<\/p>\n Illegal aliens, (They are NOT immigrants. An immigrant is a person who enters the United States lawfully and becomes a permanent resident alien with a green card), do not mow my lawn. Any person who knowingly hires an illegal alien is themselves committing a crime. These criminals do not need a pathway to legalization and citizenship, they need a pathway back to the Third World hellholes they came from.<\/p>\n But if part of the next president\u2019s job is to tackle the unfinished business Obama will likely leave behind, an equally important goal must be to defend the milestones his presidency achieved on civil rights, health care reform, climate change, and foreign policy. <\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Oh this should be interesting, much as a train wreck is interesting.<\/p>\n Obama has committed the United States to aggressive greenhouse gas reduction goals to combat climate change, but those promises are easily reversible by the next administration.<\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Of course they are easily reversed. King Putt ignored the law, as well as the constitution and just rammed through anything he liked. This nonsense about reducing so called \u201cGreenhouse Gasses\u201d has always been a crock of horse manure. Climate Change? Hey, I have news for you. The climate is always changing you mental midgets. Global Warming or as it’s called now, Climate Change, has always been an outright scam. You might want to look at the three FEET of snow in Washington D.C.<\/p>\n Likewise, the landmark agreement to stop Iran\u2019s nuclear weapons program could collapse without the next president\u2019s backing. <\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n You mean the unconditional surrender to Iran by the Obama Regime? That bogus agreement did nothing to stop, or even slow Iran’s goal of attaining and using Nuclear weapons. I hope you realize that the primary targets for Iranian nukes, after Israel, are the big liberal cities, including Boston. Hmm, now that I think of it, this might actually not be a bad deal after all.<\/p>\n The next president will also need to defeat continued GOP efforts to undermine Obamacare, while continuing to tackle health care costs.<\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Obviously, you haven’t been actually paying any attention about your \u201cSuccessful\u201d Obamacare program. Most of the state exchanges have collapsed, costs are skyrocketing and a large majority utterly despises Obamacare.<\/p>\n Clinton backs allowing Medicare to bargain for prescription drugs, as the VA does now, a common-sense step<\/a> that should lead to lower drug costs.<\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Common sense seems to be the new Progressive buzzword, much like \u201cIt’s for the Children\u201d was under Bill Clinton. I also wouldn’t want to try associating yourselves with the VA. That agency is an utter disgrace.<\/p>\n Sanders backs a single-payer system like those in Europe. Whether or not one believes single payer is a good idea, Sanders isn\u2019t leveling with voters about the cost and disruption the transition to such a system would entail.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n On that we actually agree! *faint*<\/p>\n When his own home state tried to switch to a single-payer system, the effort collapsed. By most measures, Obamacare is working, and his successor\u2019s goal should be to improve it as necessary, not start anew. <\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Obamacare is NOT working. It is failing. The only reason people are are signing up for it is the plans they had originally, and liked, were declared illegal by the Obama regime. People were forced, essentially at the point of a gun, to buy health insurance that was more expensive, forced them away from the doctors they wanted to use and in some cases, denied them the medications they needed to survive.<\/p>\n Few Americans lack an opinion of Hillary Clinton, who has served as secretary of state, a senator from New York, and as the first lady during the presidency of her husband, Bill Clinton.<\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n And most of those opinions revolve around her lack of ethics, dishonesty and contempt for the rule of law.<\/p>\n Still, in the same way that Obama caught some lucky breaks in 2008, Clinton has drawn a very good hand this year.<\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Would that be four Jokers?<\/p>\n Her main Democratic opponent has failed to expand his coalition,<\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Really? From what I’ve been reading, Comrade Bernie is doing quite well. We shall see who things go during the primaries of course.<\/p>\n her GOP opponents are undercutting themselves every time they attack her over e-mails, Benghazi, or her husband\u2019s sex life.<\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Oh those pesky emails, you mean the ones that were marked SAP? (Special Access Program) You know, the highest possible classification out there? Not to mention the 1300+ other documents with various levels of security classifications on them. No, they aren’t at all important. It’s just a minor interdepartmental squabble.<\/p>\n Benghazi is continuing to blow up in her face. The families of the people killed during the attack are calling her an outright liar, in public. The new movie, 13 hours, while intentionally avoiding the politics of the situation, isn’t painting Cankles or Der Fubar in a very good light.<\/p>\n But the best reason to support Clinton isn\u2019t the weaknesses of her opponents; it\u2019s her demonstrated strengths and experience. <\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n [youtuber youtube=’http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Gbp_JQ7RxqM’]<\/p>\n Even her most dyed-in-the-wool opponents ought to take a second look at her. <\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n