![\"spanish](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/spanish-inquisition.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
There is just one small problem with that thought. The FBI doesn\u2019t do security reviews, they do criminal investigations. After all, the letters \u201cF.B.I.\u201d stand for \u201cFederal Bureau of Investigation,\u201d not Federal Bureau of Security Inquiries.\u201d Now the head of the FBI, Director James Comey has had enough of this and opened fire on Cankles. Here are some of the details from Fox News<\/a>:<\/p>\n Hillary Clinton for months has downplayed the FBI investigation into her private email server and practices as a mere \u201csecurity inquiry.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n But when asked Wednesday by Fox News about Clinton’s characterization of the bureau’s probe, FBI Director James Comey said he doesn\u2019t know what “security inquiry” means — adding, \u201cWe\u2019re conducting an investigation. \u2026 That\u2019s what we do.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n The FBI director reiterated that he\u2019s \u201cnot familiar with the term security inquiry\u201d when told that is the phrase Clinton has used. <\/b><\/p>\n Oh, I think Director Comey knows what Cankles is saying when she and her band of merry minions call his investigation a security inquiry. However, as Directory Comey remarked, that\u2019s not something the FBI does. Other agencies handle those sorts of things, and when they find something, they call in the FBI to \u201cInvestigate.\u201d These comments by Director Comey came out during a press briefing.<\/p>\n The briefing comes amid reports that FBI investigators have been meeting with top aides in Clinton\u2019s inner circle, including Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills. The interviews have stoked speculation that the investigation may soon be drawing to a close, in the heat of the 2016 political season.<\/b><\/p>\n Cheryl Mills was not a happy camper when she was \u201cinterviewed\u201d and walked out of the meeting with the FBI. My guess is that she gave them a pointed \u201cI refuse to answer under the 5th<\/sup> Amendment\u201d reply to their questions. Since she wasn\u2019t going to answer, she left. I\u2019m sure we\u2019ll eventually find out what happened.<\/p>\n Asked Wednesday if he would make a public report, regardless of whether criminal charges are pursued, Comey said he would not say at this time. But he said there are \u201cno special set of rules for anybody that the FBI investigates.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n Allow me to translate. The report will coming out, either during the trial, or of Lynch buries it, in a series of leaks to various news agencies. Then we have Cankles and her, to put it bluntly, delusions that this is not a big deal.<\/p>\n Clinton and her campaign team repeatedly have described the probe as a security inquiry. Most recently on CBS\u2019 \u201cFace the Nation\u201d on Sunday, Clinton used the term when asked how she\u2019d respond to people worried the FBI probe is a \u201cbig deal.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cI say what I\u2019ve said now for many, many months,\u201d Clinton said. \u201cIt\u2019s a security inquiry. I always took classified material seriously. There was never any material marked classified that was sent or received by me, and I look forward to this being wrapped up.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n There are three possibilities running through Clinton\u2019s rancid brain. First, she truly believes that all this is just a simple review and nothing will come of it. Second, she is in complete denial of the trouble she is in. Third, and by far the most likely, she is lying through her teeth in an attempt to make the investigation look like just another waste of time by the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy. A fourth possibility is that she\u2019s already been told that Lynch and Obama will dispose of this report and that Clinton won\u2019t be charged no matter what is found.<\/p>\n There appear to be several moving parts in the FBI investigation. <\/b>Former State Department IT staffer Bryan Pagliano, who installed and maintained the server, has been granted immunity by the Department of Justice and is cooperating with the FBI.<\/b><\/p>\n And the investigators would like to know what happened to all his email while he was at the State Department. It seems they lost that as well as all of Cankles email…right up until the FBI found it for them.<\/p>\n In another development, the infamous Romanian hacker known as \u201cGuccifer,\u201d who was extradited to the U.S. to face cyber charges, recently told Fox News<\/a> he easily breached Clinton\u2019s personal email server in early 2013.<\/b><\/p>\n Which, if Guccifer can prove it, puts to rest Cankles claims that her server was completely secure from hackers. The investigation is probably in it\u2019s final stages. About the only person left to question, I mean interview, is Hillary Rodham Clinton. Oh to be a hidden microphone in that room!<\/p>\n I suspect her lawyer will be all but supergluing her mouth shut, considering Cankles predilection to lying about anything and everything. He may literally have to kick her under the table and inform the security inquirers<\/i><\/span> investigators that Cankles will be taking the 5th<\/sup>, as opposed to her usual drinking a 5th, in order to keep from incriminating herself.<\/p>\n The only way Hillary Clinton avoids being indicted is if Lynch and Obama bury the whole thing. If they do that, then it will show that if you\u2019re one of the \u201cSpecial People,\u201d you can commit outright murder and nothing will happen to you. If Donald Trump wins, unless Obama pardons Cankles, he will have the entire thing revisited and the entire corrupt crew will be prosecuted,<\/p>\n Thatisall<\/p>\n ~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n [yasr_visitor_votes size=”medium”]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Good day all. Ever since the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton\u2019s private email server started, she and her cronies have been calling it a \u201cSecurity Inquiry.\u201d Continue reading <\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n