![\"spanish](\"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/spanish-inquisition.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Now he is being required to testify in the civil case brought against Cankles and the State Department. Pagliano is fighting video recording the questioning saying it would be a waste of time since he intends to take the 5th<\/sup> and refuse to testify. Here are the details from Fox News<\/a>:<\/p>\n The man who set up Hillary Clinton\u2019s private email server will assert his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination and refuse to answer questions over an open records lawsuit, according to court documents obtained Wednesday by Fox News. Bryan Pagliano declined to answer questions from watchdog group Judicial Watch during his deposition scheduled for Monday, according to his lawyers.<\/b><\/p>\n This is puzzling to me. I thought he was given immunity from prosecution and would then be required to answer all question put to him. How is it he can decline to answer these questions? Doesn\u2019t is immunity agreement cover this? To top it off, his lawyer is also demanding that the questioning not be recorded on video.<\/p>\n His lawyers also asked a federal judge to block Judicial Watch from recording his deposition, stating that a written transcription should be enough. <\/b><\/p>\n “Given the constitutional implications, the absence of any proper purpose for video recording the deposition, and the considerable risk of abuse, the Court should preclude Judicial Watch, Inc. (\u201cJudicial Watch\u201d) from creating an audiovisual recording of Mr. Pagliano\u2019s deposition,” they wrote. <\/b><\/p>\n His lawyers added that videotaped depositions “pose a serious danger to deponents invoking the Fifth Amendment.”<\/b><\/p>\n