![\"full](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/full-retard.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
The column went viral, but not for the reasons either Kuntzman or the New York Daily News expected. It showed Kuntzman to be a liar and a complete wimp. For the last week he has been ripped apart by pretty much everyone. I\u2019m not here to add to that, since so many other have done a far better job of it. No, I\u2019m going to comment on his latest demonstration of Pajama Boyness regarding the tragic circumstances at Disney World.<\/p>\n
This happened just before the Muslim Terrorist murdered 49 people in a nightclub in Orlando. A two year old boy was killed by an alligator in one of the lakes on Disney\u2019s property. The authorities, trying to find the boy\u2019s remains and identify the alligator, basically killed all of the gators in that pond.<\/p>\n This has angered Pajama Boy wannabe Kuntzman. He wrote a column last week attacking the decision to kill the alligators in that pond. Here is the Wimp that Whined\u2019s column<\/a> with remarks by yours truly.<\/p>\n Did something just go wrong? Well, kill all the animals! <\/b>That remains the standard stupid human reaction whenever our control of nature goes awry. <\/b>Like on Tuesday night <\/b><\/a>after a 2-year-old was apparently eaten by an alligator on an artificial beach near Disney World. The response? Local officials killed four gators.<\/b><\/p>\n Well? What did you expect? One of the alligators killed a human. We do not tolerate animals that kill humans, and that goes back to, oh I don\u2019t know, the beginning of the Human race? I guess that Kuntzman, and he really should look at a name change, thinks animals are better than people.<\/p>\n No disrespect to the suffering,<\/b><\/p>\n Of COURSE you mean to be disrespectful of their tragic loss you pansy.<\/p>\n family, but let me get this straight: We built a man-made ecosystem in the natural environment of a known predator, stocked it with fish for our amusement, built a hotel with a beach on its banks, let kids wade into the water, express shock when one gets eaten \u2014 and then we kill the animal for doing exactly what animals do? <\/b><\/p>\n I really don\u2019t think Disney stocked those ponds with alligators. They just did what gators do. They walked there and dove in. Because of laws passed by the likes of scumsucking crybabies such as yourself, Disney couldn\u2019t go in and clean out the alligators. As to the toddler?<\/p>\n The same thing <\/b>happened last month <\/b><\/a>when a small child wandered into the gorilla pen at the Cincinnati Zoo. The gorilla offered the typical animal response \u2014 so the zookeepers shot and killed him.<\/b><\/p>\n Probably because normal people, of which you are not one, consider humans, especially children, to be far more important than a gorilla. But then, you are one of those types that puts animals ahead of people, other than yourself of course.<\/p>\n So, again: We stole an animal from his natural habitat, put him on display for our pleasure, failed to secure the perimeter, and then killed the animal for doing pretty much what we paid the zoo admission fee to see him do.<\/b><\/p>\n Wrong again stupid. The gators probably went into that pond all on their own with no human intervention. In fact, I suspect that Disney would have preferred to keep the gators out of their park, except in carefully controlled areas.<\/p>\n There are many such examples of mankind\u2019s violent reaction to his own idiocy:<\/b><\/p>\n And here is where this coward, who, if actually faced with an angry chipmonk, would probably void his bowels and bladder, scream like a banshee and curly up in a little ball in the corner.<\/p>\n In 1987 in my own beloved Brooklyn, a young boy entered the polar bear cage at the Prospect Park Zoo, where he was killed by two of the animals \u2014 both of which were then murdered in a retaliatory strike. <\/b><\/p>\n Retaliatory strike? What did they do? Call in B-52\u2019s on ISIS? Oh wait! You actually support Islamic terrorists, so that can\u2019t be it. No, they put down the man killing animals.<\/p>\n In 2012, a 2-year-old boy <\/b>fell into a pen holding <\/b><\/a>African painted dogs at the Pittsburgh Zoo. The dogs mauled him to death, and one was revenge-killed by cops.<\/b><\/p>\n They probably killed the animal in order to try and save the boy. Oh wait! I forgot. As far as you\u2019re concerned, animals have rights and people don\u2019t. The next bit, which I won\u2019t bother quoting, was Brooklyn killing hundreds of Canada geese.<\/p>\n I\u2019ve had to deal with those animals. They are dirty, noisy and really a health hazard. Why? They crap all over the place. In this instance, they destroyed the birds because they were a hazard to aircraft flying in and out of JFK. I guess \u201cHe who is named after female genitalia\u201d forgot about a small issue an airliner had back in 2009.<\/p>\n Allow me to remind you. US Airways flight 1549<\/a> sucked a couple of Canada geese into their engines and had to ditch in the Hudson River. That was one of the reasons they decided to wipe out the geese. And what does \u201cHe who wishes he were a man\u201d suggest we should have done instead?<\/p>\n If we want to keep our planes safe, he said, we could fly somewhere else.<\/b><\/p>\n So basically, he wants to end air travel.<\/p>\n I\u2019m not anti-human.<\/b><\/p>\n Yes, you are. This isn\u2019t surprising since you are not Human, but a walking example of pure wimpiness.<\/p>\n I\u2019m anti-stupidity and anti-hypocrisy. Human beings have evolved over millions of years to have the biggest and best brains on the planet \u2014 but whenever we have a conflict with the other animals, we use only the rudimentary brain stem to violently strike out.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n It\u2019s called being an \u201cApex Predator<\/a>\u201d No-Nuts. You wouldn\u2019t understand what that is, since you\u2019ve show you\u2019re noting more than prey for pretty much anything that desires to eat you. Of course, even predators tend to be a bit choosy on what they devour. I have no doubt that they would simply walk over to you, and after you faint in terror, piss all over you. In most cases, that would be their way of marking their territory. In your case, it would be a notice to other creatures great and small, that you really aren\u2019t worth eating.<\/p>\n While working on this post, I noticed that the New York Daily News seems to have learned their lesson with regards to this prize winning pussy wannabe. They have disabled comments on the page. Last week, when this craven coward wrote about how terrifying it was to actually shoot an AR-15, they left comments enabled, and boy were there a lot of comments, almost all of them calling Squishy PussyWimp what he is, a liar, a fool and a poor excuse for a man.<\/p>\n This column shows that the New York Daily News has some very poor judgment in who they allow to write for them. Of course, it may be that the New York Daily News actually caters to the crybaby pansy set. It\u2019s obvious that none of them have had any experience with this thing we \u201cReal Men\u201d and Real Women\u201d call \u201cReality.\u201d<\/p>\n Thatisall<\/p>\n ~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n [yasr_visitor_votes size=”medium”]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Good day all, About a week ago, a columnist for the New York Daily News by the name of Gersh Kuntzman, wrote column, if you could call it that, about his firing an AR-15. Continue reading <\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n