{"id":22268,"date":"2016-09-26T12:55:30","date_gmt":"2016-09-26T16:55:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=22268"},"modified":"2022-08-19T11:19:27","modified_gmt":"2022-08-19T15:19:27","slug":"the-great-debate-2016","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=22268","title":{"rendered":"The Great Debate 2016"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. Tonight is the first of several debates between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. Normally, Presidential debates aren\u2019t considered a major television event. Tonight\u2019s debate looks to be very different.<\/p>\n

\"Evil<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

To begin with, the debate for tonight was scheduled opposite the weekly NFL Monday Night Football game. Right off the bat, that would normally drop viewership of the debate by 20 points. However, since this is a match up between Clinton and Trump, and with Clinton\u2019s health being questioned, the new estimates of viewership are coming in at 100 million people. As Trump would say, \u201cThis is Yuuge!\u201d<\/p>\n

\"Donald<\/a><\/p>\n

Already, we have seen stories regarding the Democrats trying to rig the debate in Clinton\u2019s favor. Almost the entire group of moderators are supporters of Hillary Clinton. Many people are remembering how the debate between Romney and Obama with Candy Crawley<\/a> was handled. This was after the Benghazi attack. Romney charged Obama with taking to long to declare the attack to be an actt of terrorism. Crowley leaped to the defense of Obama and attacked Romney, who was caught totally flat footed by it. As it turned out. Romney was right and Crowley was dead wrong.<\/p>\n

\"romney<\/a><\/p>\n

Now we\u2019re seeing the Mostly Stupid Media, besides trying to rig the debate, already saying that Hillary Clinton won big time. Never mind that the debate hasn\u2019t even been held yet. Here are some of the details from Fox News<\/a>:<\/p>\n

The New York Times and Washington Post editorial boards unleashed a broadside Monday against Donald Trump ahead of the first presidential debate, scrambling to make their case for why the Republican nominee should not be president as he gains on Hillary Clinton in the polls. <\/b><\/p>\n

Well I can answer that one. The Times and Post are wholly owned subsidiaries of the Democrat Party and well paid shills for the Clintons.<\/p>\n

The Times, after endorsing Clinton over the weekend, went a step further with a new editorial titled, \u201cWhy He Should Not Be President.\u201d <\/b>The 1,400-word essay<\/a> sought to systematically knock down Trump\u2019s own claims about his assets as a leader, describing him as a \u201cman far more consumed with himself than with the nation’s well-being.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

\"MSM2\"<\/a><\/p>\n

I have not read, nor plan to read the Time\u2019s propaganda screed. I have provided a link for you to follow if you feel like abusing your sensibilities. It doesn\u2019t surprise me one bit that they are backing Clinton. The New York Times stopped being an honest newspaper around the turn of the century. The last century that is. I find it remarkable that they think Trump doesn\u2019t care about the nation\u2019s well being. We already know that Clinton only cares about herself, money and power. But then, that describes most of the staff of the New York Times. Then we have the Washington \u201cDumb as a\u201d Post.<\/p>\n

The Washington Post<\/a>, in its editorial, said \u201cthe stakes could not be higher,\u201d but asserted that Trump has \u201camply demonstrated his unworthiness\u201d to be president. <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s beyond his capacity in the upcoming 90-minute question-and-answer sessions to reverse or even substantially modify that conclusion,\u201d the editorial board wrote. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"mainstream_media\"<\/a><\/p>\n

This shows just how corrupt and out of touch the MSM is. Everything they accuse Donald Trump of, is usually something the Clintons have done themselves. Hillary Clinton has been proven to be a pathological liar, someone who is so paranoid that she will put the nations secrets at risk to keep her communications from being archived in accordance wit the law, and who doesn\u2019t care who is hurt as long as she gets what she wants.<\/p>\n

Donald Trump has repeatedly put others first and helped out those in need. The media will not report this, and will lie, as we are now seeing. Trump has already dismissed the Times editorial.<\/p>\n

The Trump campaign, for its part, has dismissed the views of the Times’ editorial board. After the newspaper\u2019s Clinton endorsement over the weekend, Trump spokesman Jason Miller issued a statement saying:<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cThe news that the ultra-liberal, elitist, out-of-touch New York Times Editorial Board endorsed an ultra-liberal, elitist, out-of-touch candidate in Hillary Clinton has to be some of the least surprising news ever. The New York Times\u2019 Editorial Board is the embodiment of the rigged system Donald Trump is running against.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

What do you expect from a newspaper that has repeatedly covered up the criminal activities of their preferred candidate? If Donald Trump does well tonight, and Cankles falls flat on her face, (Figuratively and literally), you can count on the New York Times and the Washington Post to flat out lie about it.<\/p>\n

\"hillary4sale\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Consider this. Hillary Clinton, while answering a softball question, has a \u201cshort circuit\u201d and collapses on stage. For the average voter, it\u2019s all over and Trump will be elected. The MSM will simply deny that anything happened, and if something did, it was all Trump\u2019s fault, or Bush did it. Maybe they will blame Karl Rove or the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, saying that Clinton was drugged or something. That is the level of \u201cJournalism\u201d in America today.<\/p>\n

Thatisall<\/p>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n

[yasr_visitor_votes size=”large”]
\n(Rate this post please, we want to know what you think)<\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\t\t

<\/p>\n\t\t

<\/p>\n\t\t

Will you watch the Trump\/Clinton debate<\/strong><\/p>