![\"Precious](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/Precious-Snowflake.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
The Snowflakes and SJW\u2019s have been demonstrating against, well anything that offends them at the moment. Now, we have a bunch if moonbats at Tufts University protesting free speech. Here are the details from Heatstreet<\/a>:<\/p>\n The Tufts University student government has overwhelmingly rejected a resolution to broaden free-speech protections on campus, with some student leaders denouncing the measure as an \u201cunsafe\u201d act that \u201cactually really harms students.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n The resolution from Tufts student Jake Goldberg had called for adding clarifications to the university\u2019s speech guidelines, which have earned Tufts a \u201cred light\u201d rating<\/a> from the free-speech advocacy group FIRE. <\/b><\/p>\n The resolution took aim at the university\u2019s vague administrative prohibitions against \u201cinappropriate language,\u201d \u201cgender bias,\u201d \u201churtful words,\u201d and \u201ccomments on an individual\u2019s body or appearance,\u201d among other examples cited in the measure. <\/b><\/p>\n Well, I can see why these precious snowflakes would be offended. How dare anyone say anything that goes against the politically correct theme of the day. (Whatever it happens to be at that moment)<\/p>\n Such guidelines were far too broad, and threatened free speech rights on campus, Goldberg argued. Clarifying language was needed \u201cso that we the students are fully aware of exactly what conduct violates Tufts\u2019 policies and simultaneously receive the full protection of the First Amendment in regards to speech.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n Well, this makes sense. Currently, these rules, which are blatantly illegal in the first place, are used to attack anyone who says anything that someone else doesn\u2019t like. Apparently, the student political commissars<\/i><\/span> leaders weren\u2019t thrilled with the concept of freedom.<\/p>\n Tufts student leaders did not agree. The student senate recently voted down the measure 26 to zero, with two abstentions, the <\/b>College Fix<\/b><\/em> reports<\/a>. A number of student senators argued that the proposal \u201cactually really harms students\u201d because \u201cclarity in itself is subjective.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n One student senator argued in a Facebook post<\/a>, which she later deleted, that a holistic process is needed to balance our right to free speech and everyone\u2019s right to access their education free from discrimination.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n Follow the link provided. It leads to a .pdf file that someone created before Olivia Dehm was able to delete it from Faceplant. It\u2019s a bit fuzzy, but readable, and it shows what a little totalitarian thug Dehm is. She isn\u2019t alone in her belief that free speech is evil.<\/p>\n Student senator Nesi Altaras pushed pack on the suggestion that free-speech rights are the \u201cbest kind of rights,\u201d because \u201cthere are other countries with free speech issues, and some countries handle them better than America.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n Yes, it\u2019s called censorship, imprisonment without trial, torture and summery executions. I would suggest that move back to Turkey where you\u2019ll be happier, unless, the current dictator, Erdogan, wants to arrest you as an enemy of the state.<\/p>\n Another student senator, Ben Kesslen, suggested that Tufts students \u201cinstantly\u201d began feeling \u201cunsafe\u201d upon learning of the resolution\u2019s existence. \u201cBy passing this resolution, we [would be] making more students feel unsafe on a campus they already might not feel safe,\u201d he said. <\/b><\/p>\n What a wimp. Now here\u2019s what will probably happen in the next year or so. Someone will say something that offends you, and Tufts will move against that person. (This has already happened), Depending on what happens, there is a better then even chance that Tufts will be sued for violating the civil rights of the person being attacked by the moonbats. (There have been a few cases that have hit the courts of late) Since Tufts receives federal tax dollars, they can\u2019t claim that they are a private institution. They will lose the suit and could be liable to some major damages, not to mention a court appointed agent to oversee the corrective actions Tufts will be ordered to implement.<\/p>\n It\u2019s time for these Moonbats to come to grips with reality. Donald Trump is going to be the 45th<\/sup> president of the United States. He was elected by a majority of the country. (This nonsense about the popular vote is meaningless) He won most of the counties, with only a few high density areas going for Felonia von Pantsuit. One of the reasons he was chosen is his utter rejection of everything Politically Correct.<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n