![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/totally-shocked.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
This doesn\u2019t surprise anyone who had to suffer through the lies, fraud and cheating by Felonia and her campaign staffers. Now, there is a study basically proving what we already knew. Here are the details from Fox News:<\/p>\n
A new study by the Wesleyan Media Project has found that the 2016 presidential campaign run by Hillary Clinton is without a doubt one of the worst-run political operations in years. <\/b><\/p>\n
Interestingly, the directors of the study dispute the argument that \u201cadvertising doesn\u2019t matter\u201d in elections. Clinton\u2019s failure to advertise in certain key states, they argue, was the biggest reason for her defeat by Donald Trump. <\/b><\/p>\n I think that\u2019s very debatable. By the later stages of the campaign, people were generally sick of all the advertising. Then there was the problem of Felonia\u2019s outright lying about everything, her dishonesty, corruption, and holier than thou attitude.<\/p>\n The study also backs the view that Clinton\u2019s focus on identity politics and emphasis on condemning her opposition contributed to a campaign message devoid of substance with no clear message on policy. <\/b><\/p>\n On this, we agree. Felonia von Pantsuit\u2019s campaign basically amounted to \u201cI am already your president. Bow down and vote for me to formalize everything peons, or you are nothing more than a racistsexistmisogynistevilbadnotgood person. Then her stating that she planned on being Obama\u2019s third term, and that she would not just continue the devastation Obama caused, but double down on it, pretty much killed her campaign in the rust belt. That and calling everyone who disagreed with her a sexist, racist, etc.<\/p>\n Published in <\/b>The Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics<\/b><\/i>, the study found<\/a> that one candidate in particular, Hillary Clinton, \u201calmost ignored discussions of policy.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n There is a reason she ignored policy. Actually several reasons. First and foremost, this wasn\u2019t an election so much as it was supposed to be a coronation. Felonia and her people rigged the primary elections so that Bernie Sanders never had a chance. Another reason that Felonia von Pantsuit ignored policy was that she didn\u2019t have one. Well, that\u2019s not entirely true. She did have a policy, and that was the enrichment of Felonia von Pantsuit and her \u201cHusband\u201d Bubba Horndog\u2019s bank accounts. Everything she did revolved around increasing her wealth.<\/p>\n The study states the lack of advertising effectiveness \u201cmay owe to the unusual nature of the presidential campaign with one nonconventional candidate and the other using an unconventional message strategy.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n Yeah, not really, no. Yes, the von Pantsuit\u2019s campaign was Gawd Awful, but Felonia should never have been allowed to even run in the primaries. She has, throughout most of her adult life, played fast and loose with the law, and if the FBI investigation into Felonia\u2019s activities had been an actual, honest one, she would have been indicted long before the Democrat Convention.<\/p>\n Clinton, who was widely predicted to win by the mainstream media, <\/b><\/p>\n Let\u2019s be honest. The Mostly Stupid Media was nothing more than an unpaid propaganda\/advertising arm for the Felonia von Pantsuit campaign. You seem to have forgotten about Wikileaks and all the information that came out on just how deeply in the tank most of the Fake News agencies were.<\/p>\n Suffered unexpected losses in states where she failed to air ads until the final week before the polls.<\/strong><\/p>\n As I just mentioned, the von Pantsuit campaign had issued their marching orders to their lapdogs in the media to make sure that nothing bad, or true, came out regarding Felonia von Pantsuit.<\/p>\n In contrast, Trump advertised in these states (Wisconsin and Michigan) for weeks before he won.<\/strong><\/p>\n President Trump\u2019s campaign was very different from the usual crap we\u2019ve seen for the last 40 years. He did things on the cheap whenever possible, and he did something that Felonia and her minions never did. He actually listened to people and told them what he was going to do. As we\u2019ve seen, President Trump has been working hard at keeping his promises.<\/p>\n Compare that with what would have happened if Felonia von Pantsuit had actually won the election. Instead of businesses feeling energetic and actually looking forward to a better government environment, we would be seeing a huge number of small businesses beginning to shut down, the economy grinding to a full halt, and Felonia unleashing assaults against anyone she perceived as a threat to her. Recall, that she fully intended to gut the 1st<\/sup> and 2nd<\/sup> Amendments and stated as much.<\/p>\n We dodged a bullet with her crushing defeat. Yes, she ran a miserable campaign, but in truth, it wasn\u2019t her lack of advertising in markets that, under normal circumstances, the Democrats would have won. It was the fact that she was a criminal, incompetent, and has a tyrannical streak in her rivaling any third world dictator. The American people, at least those with a functioning brain, saw this and gave the nod to Donald Trump.<\/p>\n Thatisall<\/p>\n ~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n [yasr_visitor_votes size=”large”]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Good day all. In the water is wet category, a study on the recently concluded presidential election states that Felonia von Pantsuit ran one of the worst campaigns in years. Continue reading <\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n