![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Trump-Offends.jpeg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Then a couple of weeks ago, the head of the House Intelligence committee, Representative Nunes, announced that he had information that, while the Trump Tower wasn’t wiretapped, that the transition team had been caught up in a legal surveillance operation, and that the names of those people had been \u201cUnmasked\u201d and spread around various agencies. The goal was to have the names leaked, which they did, and one of those named, Michael Flynn resigned.<\/p>\n
This set off the Democrats on the committee since Rep. Nunes informed President Trump of what he found as well as the Speaker of the House prior to informing the Democrats on the committee. Then there were accusations that Nunes was \u201cCovering up\u201d for Trump. One of the loudest mouths was the Democrats leader on the House Committee, Adam Schiff(less).<\/p>\n
He led demands that Nunes recuse himself from the hearings. Others demanded an ethics investigation with a few of the real nuts demanding Nunes resign. Nunes refused of course and instead invited the Democrats on the committee to go to the secure location he went to so they too could review the documents. Apparently Schiff(less) did, since he suddenly quieted down last weekend on the talking heads shows.<\/p>\n
Last night the news broke that they appear to have found who ordered the \u201cUnmasking\u201d of the names in the surveillance tapes. As expected, it was someone very high up in the Obama Administration. That person? Obama\u2019s National Security Advisor, Susan Rice. Here are some of the details from Fox News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n Multiple sources tell Fox News that Susan Rice, former national security adviser under then-President Barack Obama, requested to unmask the names of Trump transition officials caught up in surveillance. <\/b><\/p>\n The unmasked names, of people associated with Donald Trump, were then sent to all those at the National Security Council, some at the Defense Department, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and then-CIA Director John Brennan \u2013 essentially, the officials at the top, including former Rice deputy Ben Rhodes. <\/b><\/p>\n Didn\u2019t I read something about James Clapper denying that Trump\u2019s transition team was spied on? If I did, it was just another lie from a proven liar. As for Susan Rice, she has been lying to the American people all throughout the Obama Regime. She came to the fore when she said that the Benghazi attack was caused by a Youtube video.<\/p>\n She then stonewalled investigators and pretty much perjured herself in front of Congress. As her reward, she went from being the U.N. Ambassador to being made Obama\u2019s National Security Adviser. (A role that didn\u2019t require confirmation from the Senate) Continuing with a report from the Washington Times<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n The Obama administration<\/a>\u2019s national security adviser played a central role in \u201cunmasking\u201d several Trump campaign officials who had been swept up in U.S. surveillance operations against foreign targets during last year\u2019s presidential election campaign, according to current White House<\/a> officials and sources on Capitol Hill. <\/b><\/p>\n Susan E. Rice<\/a> requested that names be provided for otherwise unidentified U.S. people in dozens of raw intelligence reports relating to the Trump campaign, the sources told The Washington Times on Monday. <\/b><\/p>\n While Ms. Rice<\/a>\u2019s actions and alleged interest in the Trump campaign appear to have been within her legal authority as national security adviser, the potentially explosive revelation has touched a nerve in Washington and stirred speculation that she could be called to testify on Capitol Hill about Russian election meddling. <\/b><\/p>\n Rice continued her lying.<\/p>\n Late last month on the PBS \u201cNewsHour,\u201d Ms. Rice<\/a> was asked whether any Trump transition officials were the targets of incidental surveillance. She replied, \u201cI know nothing about this.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n