![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/schadenboner.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
During the questioning, Comey remarked that when he was conducting his phony investigation of Felonia von Pantsuit, he was told by Lynch to refer to this process as the \u201cMatter\u201d and not as the investigation. This statement, along with Bubba Horndog Clinton meeting Lynch on the runway in Arizona raised many questions, questions Lynch really doesn\u2019t want to answer. Now she may have to. Here are some of the details from Fox News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch should testify before the Senate, top Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham said Sunday, in the wake of fired FBI Director James Comey calling into question her handling of the Hillary Clinton email probe. <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cI want to hear from Loretta Lynch,\u201d Graham said. <\/b><\/p>\n Well now, Ms. Graham actually wants to do something useful? Will wonders never cease?<\/p>\n The call follows Comey\u2019s claim during a Senate committee hearing that Lynch once directed him to describe the email probe as a “matter” and not an “investigation\u201d — an alleged intervention Comey said made him \u201cqueasy.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n Perhaps you should have bought some of these Comey, then you wouldn\u2019t have felt so queasy. But then you are a deballed wimp only interested in yourself, so I suspect that treatment wouldn\u2019t have helped.<\/p>\n He also said that directive, combined with Lynch’s unusual Arizona tarmac meeting with former President Bill Clinton, led him to make his independent announcement regarding the Clinton email probe last July.<\/b><\/p>\n And Lynch didn\u2019t complain because she knew you had tanked the investigation. Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.<\/p>\n Several GOP lawmakers have shown interest in learning more about Lynch\u2019s actions following Comey\u2019s testimony. <\/b><\/p>\n Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday he wants to see whether Comey kept any notes regarding conversations with Lynch. <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cI want to see if he had any memos on Loretta Lynch,\u201d King said on Fox News\u2019 \u201cSunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n Check with the New York Times. They seem to have Comey\u2019s filing cabinet.<\/p>\n Comey\u2019s allegations about Lynch drew widespread attention. <\/b><\/p>\n He said Lynch\u2019s tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton was a “deciding factor” in his decision to act alone to update the public on the Clinton probe — and protect the bureau’s reputation.<\/b><\/p>\n More like cover your own ass Comey.<\/p>\n “There were other things, significant items,” he added, citing how “the attorney general directed me not to call it an investigation and call it a matter — which confused me.” <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cThat was one of the bricks in the load that I needed to step away from the department,\u201d Comey said, later adding he was concerned Lynch was trying to align the DOJ\u2019s comments with the way the campaign was talking about the probe. \u201cThat gave me a queasy feeling,\u201d he said. <\/b><\/p>\n You seem to always have an upset stomach, don\u2019t you Comey? It probably comes from being a gutless coward. You should have told Lynch that it was an investigation and that was that. Or you should have resigned. It\u2019s the same thing with President Trump.<\/p>\n If you felt he was out of line, you should have brought it up with him. He probably would have corrected himself. He doesn\u2019t think like you and the rest of the beltway uniturds. You didn\u2019t which tells me you are a weasel and a gutless one. Now your cowardice is going to sink you and probably Lynch.<\/p>\n Lynch and former President Clinton met on a tarmac in Phoenix, Ariz., on June 27, 2016, which immediately raised questions about whether she — or the Justice Department — could be impartial in the Hillary Clinton email investigation. <\/b><\/p>\n And, as we found out, they weren\u2019t.<\/p>\n Days later, Comey called Hillary Clinton\u2019s actions \u201cextremely careless\u201d but declined to recommend charges. <\/b><\/p>\n And that was the announcement that cost you your job. It showed that you were in the tank with the Clintons and even though Lynch was stupid enough to allow Bubba Horndog on her plane, you still had the chance to \u201cFix things.\u201d All you had to say was that you were recommending that Felonia von Pantsuit be prosecuted. Which she should have. Of course, she still can be.<\/p>\n Of course, The Progressive Democrats are circling the wagons. They might still throw Lynch under the bus, but first they need to make sure she doesn\u2019t have anything on them.<\/p>\n Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said Sunday on CNN\u2019s \u201cState of the Union\u201d that she would have had a \u201cqueasy feeling, too.\u201d She said lawmakers need to know more about that, and the judiciary committee should \u201ctake a look\u201d at it. <\/b><\/p>\n But not to hard, right?<\/p>\n Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., though, said he hasn\u2019t heard Lynch\u2019s side of the story and cannot say \u201cwhether it rises to the level that she should come and testify.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cAll I\u2019m saying with Loretta Lynch is before anyone jumps to any conclusions, we ought to hear what she has to say,\u201d he said on \u201cFace the Nation.\u201d \u201cAnd let her state something privately and see if it makes much of a difference. I don\u2019t know that it will.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n