![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/butthurt.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
The ComPost, which has been demanding President Trump\u2019s Impeachment since November 10th<\/sup>, 2016 because he isn\u2019t Felonia von Pantsuit, has a long panicked screed from two of it\u2019s \u201cJournalists, Marc Fisher<\/a> and Jenna Johnson<\/a>. Their commentary is just filled with a wealth of misinformation and a complete lack of understanding on how the nuclear launch authorization system works. Here are their remarks from the Washington ComPost<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n As with most things Trump, the furor over the \u201cfire and fury\u201d has divided the nation in two \u2014 those who believe the president is a loose cannon, impulsively blurting whatever flits through his mind, and those who believe his inflammatory talk is a wily combination of politically savvy instincts and a gut-driven populism that simply aims to please. <\/b><\/p>\n And we\u2019re off to the races! First, a little history of the mess that is North Korea. To begin with, we are still technically at war with them. There is no peace treaty, only an armistice that the North Koreans have broken repeatedly. Second, we are in this mess in no small part to the incompetence and stupidity of Barack Obama, George W. Bush and Bill Clinton. This mess should have been dealt with back in the 90\u2019s.<\/p>\n Now, thanks to those three, we have to concern ourselves with the very real possibility that a delusional nut will actually launch a nuclear attack. Oh, by the way, it won\u2019t be President Trump. He is neither delusional or a nut, no matter how much the Proglodytes say he is. The dictator of North Korea, Fat psychopathic slob, Kim Jong Un is the one who has been threatening nuclear war.<\/p>\n When President Trump went off script Tuesday to deliver a startling threat to North Korea \u2014 \u201cThey will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen\u201d \u2014 it was as if the nation relived the most lurid themes of the 2016 campaign in one chilling moment. <\/b><\/p>\n First, are you sure he went off script? Second, we all know what good Progressive Liberal Moonbats like you would prefer. Mealy-mouth whines followed by a quick surrender.<\/p>\n Last fall, Hillary Clinton\u2019s campaign used as one of its final weapons a TV ad featuring a longtime nuclear missile launch officer who warned against voting for Trump: \u201cI prayed that call would never come. Self-control may be all that keeps these missiles from firing.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n I really wonder if this individual actually was a launch officer. If he was, then he has to be the most incompetent one in history. As part of their training, the actual way a launch order is given is taught to them, along with all the very highly classified safeguards in place to prevent a nuclear release, either accidentally or by an insane president or general.<\/p>\n Obviously, I don\u2019t know the classified parts, but the general information is that no single person can initiate a nuclear release. We have what\u2019s called the \u201cTwo Man Rule.\u201d If President Trump were to order a nuclear strike, he would have to have a second person to confirm it. In the case of a first strike, there are multiple safeguards in place. Now a retaliatory strike is a somewhat different matter, but it still requires someone confirming the presidential launch order. Perhaps the idiots who wrote this drek never bothered to read Tom Clancy<\/a>?<\/p>\n Voters made clear last fall that they trusted Clinton vastly more than Trump on the use of nuclear weapons \u2014 by 57 percent to 31 percent in a Fox News poll in October, for example. <\/b><\/p>\n So how is President Felonia von Pantsuit doing with regards to North Korea\u2019s nuclear threats? Oh wait! She lost!! Perhaps you meant Liberal voters. Of course, we know those are the ONLY people you talk to. As to the polls? You do know that no one believes them anymore. They have been consistently wrong about pretty much everything, starting with the BREXIT vote last year. As for the Trump supporters?<\/p>\n Fred Doucette, a longtime Trump supporter who is assistant majority leader in New Hampshire\u2019s House of Representatives, watched Trump\u2019s appearance Tuesday. He was disappointed Trump didn\u2019t declare a national emergency on opioid abuse but was pleased to hear the president deliver a strong message to North Korea. <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cThe president spoke in a language that Kim Jong Un understands \u2014 and, personally, I think they should follow up on that and show them that we mean business,\u201d said Doucette, 52, a Navy veteran and retired firefighter and paramedic. \u201cI assume the president spoke with his generals and his Cabinet first.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n I\u2019m sure he did. He would have to, since the last thing anyone wants is war, nuclear or otherwise. If speaking loudly and carrying a big stick can stop North Korea, then President Trump can tweet away to his heart\u2019s content.<\/p>\n Last fall, 10 former Air Force nuclear launch officers issued an open letter warning that Trump \u201cshould not be entrusted with the nuclear launch codes .?.?. He has shown himself time and again to be easily baited and quick to lash out, dismissive of expert consultation and ill-informed of even basic military and international affairs.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n And there is a reason that they are all \u201cFormer\u201d officers. As for Felonia von Pantsuit? She would have sold the nuclear launch codes TO the North Koreans for donations to the Clinton Slush Fund<\/i><\/span> Foundation. However, it looks like the \u201cTen Officers United in their belief\u201d may not be so united any longer.<\/p>\n But on Wednesday, those officers were no longer united in their view of Trump. <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cThe reaction to this is not wholly rational,\u201d said one of the signatories, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because his employer had not authorized him to speak publicly. \u201cA lot of people are caught up on Trump the character \u2014 and he is erratic \u2014 without thinking about whether there\u2019s historical precedent for this kind of language. I\u2019m actually a little relieved that Trump is crawling inside the North Koreans\u2019 helmets. I would not have chosen those words, but he did put the fear of God into them.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n And that is the whole idea. If we can scare that fat slob into thinking that President Trump will nuke his ass, or even just napalm him into a charcoal briquette, then we may very well prevent the very war that Liberal Weakness came close to causing.<\/p>\n But another of the former \u201cmissileers\u201d said Trump\u2019s fiery rhetoric was evidence of exactly what he had warned about last fall. \u201cHe speaks impulsively, and he acts impulsively, and I don\u2019t know what restraints there are on President Trump,\u201d said Mark Lussky, a retired lawyer who served on a missile combat crew from 1972 to 1976. \u201cHe doesn\u2019t know how to back down on anything.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n So, you think we should back down to the threats from that fat troll with the bad haircut? You wouldn\u2019t be related to a guy named Neville Chamberlain by any chance, would you? Now President Trump did use his own words, and unlike members of the Beltway Uniparty, he doesn\u2019t tend to use weasel words.<\/p>\n Press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said, although Trump\u2019s \u201cwords were his own … the tone and strength of the message were discussed beforehand\u201d by Chief of Staff John F. Kelly and members of the National Security Council. <\/b><\/p>\n As much as it pains you to consider this, President Trump does listen to his advisers on military matters. Unlike King Putt or Felonia von Pantsuit, he understands that he doesn\u2019t know everything.<\/p>\n Presidents don\u2019t usually improvise comments on global crises. \u201cWhat would be \u2018normal\u2019 in the Bush or Obama or Clinton administrations would be for the combination of strategic communications people and policy people \u2014 including the national security adviser \u2014 to develop, in consultation with the State Department and the Defense Department, a messaging strategy with top lines that they felt the president needed to emphasize,\u201d said a senior diplomat who served in all three administrations. <\/b><\/p>\n In other words, take 6 months to run this through the usual filters and say absolutely nothing. How refreshing it is to have a president just come out and say what will happen to some thug if he tries anything. No wonder these two \u201cwriters\u201d have their panties in a knot.<\/p>\n During the campaign, Felonia von Pantsuit and her staff of clowns basically tried to use the same style of ads that were used by Lyndon Johnson against Barry Goldwater. It didn\u2019t work for may reasons, one of which is that Felonia is a corrupt battleaxe and would have moved to institute total suppression of anything that she didn\u2019t like, starting with the 1st<\/sup> Amendment. The Clinton\u2019s past history of despising the military didn\u2019t help.<\/p>\n Now, lets consider the worst case scenario. The United States will not launch a nuclear first strike on North Korea for many reasons, the biggest one being, we really don\u2019t want to. We might have to initiate a conventional strike, but even that is some ways away, and hopefully will never come to pass.<\/p>\n That said, there is a very big worry that Kim Jung Un is just crazy enough to actually fire a nuclear tipped missile, perhaps a number of them, at South Korea, Japan and the United States. There is a fair chance that the attacks, if they occur, against the United States and Japan will be stopped with the missiles shot down or diverted to explode harmlessly. (If a nuke going off can be considered harmless.<\/p>\n South Korea is the problem. The actual time in transit for a missile is a very few minutes and any defenses there might not be able to engage and intercept an incoming warhead. If we can stop all the weapons, then we can pause, reflect on what we need to do and take the appropriate actions. However, if a warhead hits a target, be it in South Korea, Japan or the United States, then the gloves come off and North Korea is turned into a radioactive charnal house<\/a>.<\/p>\n In 1938, when Adolph Hitler was bullying his way around Europe, he met with Neville Chamberlain, then Prime Minister of Great Britain. Chamberlain went into the meeting thinking that he could come to an agreement with Hitler and prevent a war. Hitler came into the meeting with the goal of getting as much as he could without firing a shot, and buying himself and Germany more time to prepare for the war Hitler and the Nazi\u2019s fully intended to start.<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n