{"id":25178,"date":"2017-10-25T15:31:22","date_gmt":"2017-10-25T19:31:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=25178"},"modified":"2020-10-17T18:18:53","modified_gmt":"2020-10-17T22:18:53","slug":"that-trump-dossier-just-exploded-in-the-democrats-face","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=25178","title":{"rendered":"That Trump dossier just exploded in the Democrats face"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. There\u2019s a lot of interesting stuff today. One of the big stories is how the Democrat\u2019s push to \u201cGet Trump\u201d just blew up in their faces.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

This isn\u2019t the Uranium One scandal, this is the so called \u201cTrump Dossier\u201d that came out late last year and is where all the \u201cTrump colluded with Russia to steal the election from Hillary\u201d crap came from. The dossier was rather quickly debunked, but that hasn\u2019t stopped the Democrats from pushing it. One of the big questions has been, \u201cWho paid for this pile of horse shit in the first place?\u201d Well, the answer came out yesterday. Here are the details from Fox News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

The bombshell revelation that Hillary Clinton\u2019s campaign and the Democratic National Committee helped fund the controversial anti-Trump dossier last year has lawmakers and the media asking tough questions about how the dubious document was used by the highest levels of U.S. law enforcement \u2013 and why Democrats \u201clied\u201d about its origins. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

I can see it now. \u201cHow the HELL did they find out it was us that paid to smear Trump?\u201d<\/p>\n

In the midst of a court case that threatened to reveal the dossier\u2019s funding, it emerged overnight that political consulting firm Fusion GPS was retained last year by Marc E. Elias, an attorney representing the DNC and the Clinton campaign. The firm then hired former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele to write the now-infamous dossier. <\/b><\/p>\n

And the rest, as they say, is history.<\/p>\n

Not only did the Clinton campaign and DNC fund the firm through the end of October 2016, but the FBI reportedly arranged to pay Steele to proceed with intelligence gathering on Donald Trump and Russia after Trump\u2019s election. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

That deal was later nixed after the former intelligence officer was identified in news reports.<\/b><\/p>\n

Why am I not surprised at any of this? This is part and parcel for the Clintons, and they basically owned the Democrat Party. I have little doubt that Felonia knew about this little Nixonian dirty trick. It fits right in with her way of thinking. Now the Congress is starting to dig in to the whole mess, at least some of them are.<\/p>\n

House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., said Wednesday that his biggest questions concern to what extent the FBI relied on that document to launch its Russia probe. <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cMy focus has always been whether or not the Department of Justice and the FBI relied upon an unsourced CI document to launch a counterintelligence investigation,\u201d he told Fox News\u2019 \u201cAmerica\u2019s Newsroom.\u201d \u201cI want to know whether the nation\u2019s premier law enforcement agency relied on a document that looks like the National Enquirer prepared it. \u2026 And if they relied upon an unsourced, un-vetted document to launch a really important investigation \u2026 then I think our country is big enough to handle that truth.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

And this is where this scandal crosses the aisle. Arizona Senator, John McSlime was given a copy of the dossier, and since he hates Donald Trump, practically teleported to the FBI<\/a> to hand it over to them. The FBI already had a copy, not that McSlime knew that.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

From what I recall, the regular FBI agents looked at the dossier and quickly determined it was just a load of horse manure. However, the higher ups, \u201cCough James Comey Cough\u201d thought it might prove useful. They have been using it to investigate the fake collusion claims against President Trump.<\/p>\n

Now that this mess has detonated in the faces of the Democrats, Gowdy and other Republicans have been demanding that the FBI answer some rather pointed questions. The FBI has been rather uncooperative.<\/p>\n

House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said at a Washington, D.C., event on Wednesday that the FBI has been \u201cstonewalling\u201d Congress\u2019 request for documents, voicing frustration about learning this information through the media.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cThe FBI needs to comply with the documents request that Congress has on their desk right now and they need to do it immediately,\u201d Ryan said.<\/strong><\/p>\n

So why are you and the other Uniparty turds pussyfooting around? Why not ask President Trump to order the FBI to comply? I suspect he would be very happy to. You can also start putting the screws to the Department of Justice and the FBI by cutting their funding…severely cutting it.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the Democrats and Felonia von Pantsuit campaign workers are busily digging a nice deep hole for themselves on Twitter. For months these losers have been denying they had anything to do with the Dossier. Now, the New York Times, of all groups, is slamming them over the lies they\u2019ve been spewing.<\/p>\n

Sources told The Post that neither the Clinton campaign nor the DNC specifically directed Steele\u2019s work, labeling the intelligence officer simply as a Fusion GPS subcontractor. <\/b><\/p>\n

But after the Post story broke, reporters with The New York Times blasted Elias and others on Twitter, accusing them of denying the connection for months. <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cWhen I tried to report this story, Clinton campaign lawyer @marceelias pushed back vigorously, saying \u2018You (or your sources) are wrong,\u2019\u201d New York Times reporter Kenneth Vogel tweeted. <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cFolks involved in funding this lied about it, and with sanctimony, for a year,\u201d Times reporter Maggie Haberman tweeted. <\/b><\/p>\n