{"id":27463,"date":"2018-11-16T06:10:14","date_gmt":"2018-11-16T11:10:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=27463"},"modified":"2018-11-16T06:10:14","modified_gmt":"2018-11-16T11:10:14","slug":"and-now-we-know-why-comey-covered-for-felonia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=27463","title":{"rendered":"And now we know why Comey covered for Felonia"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. As we all know, former director of the Federal Bureau of Ineptitude…Investigation, James Comey, basically whitewashed the entire espionage case against then presidential candidate, Felonia von Pantsuit.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Many people wondered why, and chalked it up to basic corruption and fear. (Comey was probably concerned with committing suicide by shooting himself twice in the back of the head, with two different guns) While the obvious corruption was instrumental, since Comey was fired, more and more information has been coming out regarding that investigation and other things Comey has done. Now reports have come out that Comey was doing almost the exact same thing as Felonia with classified email. Here are the details from the New York Post<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

Fired FBI chief James Comey used his private Gmail account<\/a> hundreds of times to conduct government business \u2014 and at least seven of those messages were deemed so sensitive by the Justice Department that they declined to release them. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The former top G-man repeatedly claimed he only used his private account for \u201cincidental\u201d purposes and never for anything that was classified \u2014 and that appears to be true.<\/b><\/p>\n

Now how can that be true if they have announced that he did send classified information through Gmail?<\/p>\n

But Justice acknowledged in response to a Freedom of Information request that Comey and his chief of staff discussed government business on about 1,200 pages of messages, 156 of which were obtained by The Post. <\/b><\/p>\n

The Justice Department responded to the Freedom of Information Act request, filed by The Cause of Action Institute, a conservative watchdog group, that there were an eye-popping 1,200 pages of messages for Comey and his chief of staff that met the criteria. <\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Justice released 156 of them but refused to hand over seven emails because they would \u201cdisclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions.\u201d And another 363 pages of emails were withheld because they discussed privileged agency communications or out of personal privacy concerns. <\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

In one email on Oct. 7, 2015, Comey seems to recognize the hypocrisy of the FBI investigating Hillary Clinton\u2019s email practices<\/a> while he\u2019s exchanging FBI info on his own private account because his government account was down. <\/b>Two days after complaining that his \u201cmobile is not sending emails,\u201d Comey asked an aide that the testimony he was to deliver to the Senate be sent on his private account \u2014 calling it an \u201cembarrassing\u201d situation. <\/b><\/p>\n

Now that testimony, in and of itself, might not have been classified. However, it does violate the laws and regulations regarding the handling of government documents.<\/p>\n

Lisa Rosenberg, executive director of Open the Government, a nonpartisan coalition that advocates for government transparency, said Comey\u2019s practice of using personal email while investigating Clinton reeks of a double standard. <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s just so transparently hypocritical to have one standard for a person you are investigating and an entirely different standard for yourself when you are the one who\u2019s enforcing the law,\u201d Rosenberg said. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The inspector general at Justice previously slammed Comey for using his personal account<\/a> for FBI business, saying it was \u201cinconsistent\u201d with government policy. But Comey claimed his private email use was \u201cincidental\u201d and only used for word processing a \u201cpublic speech or public email.\u201d He said he wasn\u2019t sending \u201canything remotely classified\u201d on Gmail and that his use was \u201ca totally different thing\u201d from Clinton\u2019s. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\u201cHe can\u2019t have it both ways,\u201d Rosenberg said.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cEither he used his personal email for things that were public or would be in the public domain, or he used it to discuss internal policies, investigations, etc. that might or might not be appropriately withheld under FOIA.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

Comey is Deep State Swamptard. Of course he thinks he can have it both ways. He\u2019s special, remember?<\/p>\n

A rep for Comey said he had no comment. <\/b><\/p>\n

That\u2019s called \u201cAsserting my 5th<\/sup> Amendment right not to incriminate myself,\u201d something I expect he will be doing a lot of in the next year. One of the problems with Comey has been the now former Attorney General, Jeff \u201cSleepy\u201d Sessions. Rather then appoint an investigator, he dumped this on the Inspector General\u2019s office. The IG has limited powers, none of them involving indictments, arrests and prosecution.<\/p>\n

Now that Sleepy is history, perhaps we will finally get an AG who will start digging out the \u201cDeep State\u201d operatives and prosecuting them. Comey is already on the hook for leaking classified information, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe is in deep trouble for his antics, and Rod RodentStain has been very questionable in handling FISA warrant requests. Rounding them up, then going after Felonia von Pantsuit, Loretta Lynch and Eric Holder should be at the top of the list of things to do for whoever takes over.<\/p>\n

Thatisall<\/p>\n\"1\"2\"3\"4\"5 (2<\/strong> votes, average: 3.00<\/strong> out of 5)
<\/span><\/span>Loading...<\/span>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n