{"id":27584,"date":"2018-12-09T18:27:52","date_gmt":"2018-12-09T23:27:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=27584"},"modified":"2018-12-09T18:27:52","modified_gmt":"2018-12-09T23:27:52","slug":"who-are-the-real-racists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=27584","title":{"rendered":"Who are the real racists?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. Whenever the Left starts losing an argument, (Which is most of the time), you can count on them to start screaming \u201cRACIST!!!\u201d at anyone who disagrees with them. They like to say that Republicans and Conservatives are always suppressing non-Caucasians. Interestingly, it\u2019s not the Republicans that are hung up on someone\u2019s skin color, it\u2019s liberals.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Recently, a study was done<\/a> looking how the two groups, (Conservatives and Liberal Moonbats), interact with people of recent African decent. (Note. We all came out of Africa, some more recently than others) The study was done by a well known group of racists from Yale and Princeton Universities. Here are some of the details from The Washington Times<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

White liberals present themselves as less competent when addressing minorities, while conservatives use the same vocabulary no matter what the race of their audience, according to a newly released study<\/a>.<\/b><\/p>\n

Yale and Princeton researchers found that white Democratic presidential candidates and self-identified liberals played down their competence when speaking to minorities, using fewer words that conveyed accomplishment and more words that expressed warmth. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

On the other hand, there were no significant differences in how white conservatives, including Republican presidential candidates, spoke to white versus minority audiences. <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cWhite liberals self-present less competence to minorities than to other Whites \u2014 that is, they patronize minorities stereotyped as lower status and less competent,\u201d according to the study\u2019s abstract. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Needless to say, these findings startled the researchers.<\/p>\n

Cydney Dupree<\/a>, assistant professor of organizational behavior at the Yale School of Management, said she was surprised by the findings of the study, which sought to discover how \u201cwell-intentioned whites\u201d interact with minorities. <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cIt was kind of an unpleasant surprise to see this subtle but persistent effect,\u201d Ms. Dupree<\/a> said. \u201cEven if it\u2019s ultimately well-intentioned, it could be seen as patronizing.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Don\u2019t you just love it when a researcher goes into something with a few preconceived notions, and then discover those pesky facts simply do not back up their beliefs?<\/p>\n

The study flies in the face of a standard talking point of the political left \u2014 that white conservatives are racist \u2014 while raising questions about whether liberals are perpetuating racial stereotypes about blacks being less competent than whites. <\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s one of my \u201cFacts.\u201d Every single liberal I\u2019ve had the displeasure of listening to comes across as a racist of the worst sort. The White Progressives are by far the worst. They think that anyone not like themselves is inferior and \u201cThe Great White Father\/Mother\u201d must help them. Why? Because these poor people \u201cOf Color\u201d, (I really hate that term by the way), are to ignorant to make any decisions for themselves. Therefore, only the \u201cWell Educated Progressive\u201d is qualified to make decisions for these poor, ignorant African-American\u2019s.<\/p>\n

Conservatives, on the other hand, flat out don\u2019t give a damn about someone\u2019s skin color or eye shape. Since they don\u2019t think in terms of skin color, eye shape, etc, then, according to the Progressives, they must be racists, something that Progressives will scream at them constantly.<\/p>\n

Ms. Dupree<\/a> and Princeton\u2019s Susan Fiske analyzed the text for \u201cwords related to competence\u201d such as \u201cassertive\u201d and \u201ccompetitive\u201d and \u201cwords related to warmth\u201d such as \u201csupportive\u201d and \u201ccompassionate.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cThe team found that Democratic candidates used fewer competence-related words in speeches delivered to mostly minority audiences than they did in speeches delivered to mostly white audiences,\u201d said the Yale press release. \u201cThe difference wasn\u2019t statistically significant in speeches by Republican candidates.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

Ms. Dupree<\/a> noted that Republicans also gave fewer speeches to minority audiences. <\/b><\/p>\n

The reason Republicans gave few speeches is simple. They weren\u2019t invited. Why? Because to many of the \u201cMinority\u201d groups have swallowed the Progressives line that Conservatives are racists. However, many people who happen to be of recent African decent are beginning to see through the lies the Progressives have been spewing and to the horror of Progressives, are thinking for themselves and are beginning to leave the Progressive plantation.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The researchers then set up an experiment in which white liberals were asked to respond to hypothetical individuals named \u201cEmily\u201d and \u201cLakisha.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cLiberal individuals were less likely to use words that would make them appear highly competent when the person they were addressing was presumed to be black rather than white,\u201d said the release. \u201cNo significant differences were seen in the word selection of conservatives based on the presumed race of their partner.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

The reason you don\u2019t want to say Ms. Dupree is that Republicans see people\u2019s potential and treat them as they want to be treated. Progressives, particularly white progressives, see everyone not like them as inferior on an instinctive level.<\/p>\n

Ms. Dupree<\/a> said the \u201ccompetence downshift\u201d could indicate a greater eagerness by white liberals to connect with those of other races. <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cMy hope is that this work will help include well-intentioned people who see themselves as allies but who may be unwittingly contributing to group divides,\u201d said Ms. Dupree<\/a>. \u201cThere is a broader need to include them in the conversation.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

As the old saying goes, the road to Hell is paved with good intentions. The issue is simple. Progressives, especially white progressives, see everyone else as inferior. As for people with dark skin, (Blacks, Hispanics, etc), they see them in exactly the same way they saw them a century ago. They see them as servants who need to be watched since they are all thieves and are looking to steal the silver and molest their daughters.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Progressives love to talk about their favorite progressive Icons, People like Margaret Sanger<\/a> for instance. What they won\u2019t consider was that Sanger was a flat out racists who saw Blacks as inferior and who needed to \u201cBred out of existence.\u201d Birth Control and Abortion were aimed at those she considered inferior and who should be stopped from breeding.<\/p>\n

Then we have another Darling of the Progressives, President Woodrow Wilson<\/a>. What they won\u2019t acknowledge was that Wilson was a flat out racist who, once he took office, fired everyone who wasn\u2019t white. He despised the Constitution and believed in segregation. However, the modern Progressive see him as a genius who ushered in such great ideas as the Income Tax and the Federal Reserve. They won\u2019t acknowledge his actions towards Blacks and others.<\/p>\n

Finally, we should look at which party did the most for Civil Rights in the country. I\u2019ll give you a hint. It wasn\u2019t the Democrats. They stood against every major civil rights legislation since losing the civil war. Yet when the various civil rights acts were passed, they were the ones to claim credit. Then they used these laws to assuage their liberal guilt by doubling down on their racism. They just hit, and continue to hit different targets.<\/p>\n

The results of this study is not a surprise to anyone who thinks logically. (Which lets out the Progressives) It all boils down to this. Progressives only see someone\u2019s skin color. Conservatives see the whole individual. Conservatives and most Republicans understand that a person\u2019s skin color is only a genetic adaption to local conditions, nothing more. This is why the Progressives must accuse the Republicans and Conservatives of being racists. They are projecting on to others what they actually are.<\/p>\n

Thatisall<\/p>\n\"1\"2\"3\"4\"5 (2<\/strong> votes, average: 5.00<\/strong> out of 5)
<\/span><\/span>Loading...<\/span>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n