{"id":27596,"date":"2018-12-10T07:57:14","date_gmt":"2018-12-10T12:57:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=27596"},"modified":"2018-12-10T07:57:14","modified_gmt":"2018-12-10T12:57:14","slug":"guess-who-wrote-that-climate-report-trump-rejected","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=27596","title":{"rendered":"Guess who wrote that Climate Report Trump rejected?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. A couple of weeks ago, the Fourth National Climate Assessment was put out by ther Trump Administration. As soon as it was released, President Trump took issue with its conclusions in his typical manner. He blasted it on twitter.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Of course, the usual suspects instantly took issue with President Trump, accusing him of being a \u201cDenier\u201d and Evil, Bad, Not good\u201d and demanding that congress remove him and the American people submit to socialism \u201cTo save the planet!\u201d Well, as usual, it looks like President Trump had the facts, and the facts indicate the fix was in on this report. Here are the details from The Washington Times<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

A former Obama administration<\/a> official with ties to a liberal advocacy group funded by Democratic megadonors George Soros and Tom Steyer<\/a> helped prepare the Fourth National Climate Assessment, whose dire predictions have since been attacked as overblown. <\/b><\/p>\n

Andrew Light, who worked on the 2015 Paris accord negotiations as a senior adviser to the U.S. Special Envoy on Climate Change under Secretary of State John F. Kerry, served as a review editor for the assessment, overseeing the pivotal final chapter that concluded under a worst-case scenario that global warming could wipe out as much as 10 percent of the U.S. economy by 2100. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

So, we have a former Obama minion who is paid by George Soros and Tom Steyer, to people known for their desire to destroy both President Trump and American freedom and sovereignty. Yep, this was going to be a very well researched and balanced report.<\/p>\n

Now a senior fellow at the World Resources Institute, Mr. Light also spent five years as senior fellow and director of international climate policy at the Center for American Progress, which was founded and now led by longtime Democratic insider John Podesta. The center is also financed by liberal billionaires such as Mr. Soros and Mr. Steyer<\/a>. <\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The involvement of Mr. Light and other figures known for their climate change advocacy has raised questions about the credibility of the report, which has been widely depicted as a politically neutral, scientific document prepared by disinterested specialists from 13 federal agencies. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

There was never any attempt at this being an honest report. As for those disinterested specialists from 13 government agencies? They are deep state operatives for Obama and the CommuNazis, and should have been terminated from their positions when President Trump took office. As for those agencies? They should be defunded and closed. I doubt any of them actually do anything but generate paper and costs to Americans.<\/p>\n

Roger A. Pielke Jr.<\/a>, University of Colorado Boulder environmental studies professor, criticized the decision to bring in Mr. Light, as well as the report\u2019s reliance for the 10 percent figure on a 2017 study funded in part by Mr. Steyer<\/a>\u2019s Next Generation and Bloomberg Philanthropies. <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cThe question remains, whose idea was it to have John Podesta\u2019s climate adviser and Obama political appointee be in charge of the review of the most important chapter, which leans heavily on Tom Steyer<\/a> research?\u201d Mr. Pielke<\/a> said in an email. <\/b><\/p>\n

Do you really need to ask Mr. Pielke? It was some Obama holdover and a paid up member of the Church of Global Warming and Climate Change.<\/p>\n

Mr. Light has no formal academic scientific credentials \u2014 he earned his Ph.D. in philosophy \u2014 but noted that he completed a three-year postdoctoral research fellowship in environmental risk assessment. <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cI believe I was selected as a Review Editor because for over fifteen years I have been working on domestic and international environmental, climate, and energy policy,\u201d he said. \u201cI have authored or co-authored over a dozen policy reports in this area, participated and led several important dialogues and projects in this field, and made substantial contributions to climate and energy agreements.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

No, you were selected for your political correctness and your worship of all things Progressive and Globalist. Competence and training in the subject was not considered. In other words, You were chosen because Soros and Steyer could count on you to write up a nice steaming pile of crap with no basis in reality.<\/p>\n

The report lists more than 200 authors and contributors, most of them federal employees but also dozens from universities, advocacy groups, foundations, think tanks and consulting firms specializing in advising governments and businesses on climate change adaptation and resilience. <\/b><\/p>\n

I believe we have found the link. These groups stand to lose massive amounts of funding from the American Taxpayer. This is a classic case of \u201cFollow the money!\u201d As to being a well balanced report, guess again.<\/p>\n

Absent were prominent scientists affiliated with top research universities who have challenged catastrophic climate scenarios, such as John Christy, Judith Curry, William Happer, Richard Lindzen, Roger A. Pielke Sr. and Roy Spencer. <\/b><\/p>\n

Nope, no heretics allowed, Algore Be Praised!!<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Mr. Trump dismissed the assessment, saying, \u201cI don\u2019t believe it,\u201d prompting CNN to scold him for \u201cdismissing his own experts.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Skeptics, meanwhile, have blasted the report as \u201ctripe\u201d (Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore), a \u201c400-page pile of crap\u201d (Heartland Institute\u2019s John Dunn), \u201cirrelevant\u201d (JunkScience\u2019s Steven J. Milloy), and \u201cbaseless scaremongering\u201d (Watts Up With That\u2019s Eric Worrall). <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cThe National Climate Assessment report reads like a press release from environmental pressure groups \u2014 because it is,\u201d said Marc Morano, author of \u201cThe Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

And, as for the CNN accusation that President Trump doesn\u2019t believe \u201cHis own scientists?\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThese are not \u2018Trump\u2019s own scientists\u2019 as the media likes to claim,\u201d Mr. Morano said. \u201cThe key authors are in fact left-wing environmental activists with the Union of Concerned Scientists, Center for American Progress, and the Obama Administration<\/a>. And they cited outlier studies funded by Steyer<\/a> and [Michael] Bloomberg.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

In other words, the usual suspects of the Elitist CommuNazi left. Now I am not a scientist, but I have been following this global warming crap for over a decade, and it is a load of crap. it\u2019s been about two things. Money and power. We have seen over the last 20 years how many of these so-called \u201cscientists\u201d have been rigging results, all to keep the burning truckloads of grant money coming in. It\u2019s literally reached the levels, in some cases, of flagrant criminal fraud.<\/p>\n

As for the power, people like Soros and Steyer want to rule over the people as well as enrich themselves and those they consider to be their social(ist), equals. Global Warming and it\u2019s stepchild Climate Change has never been about science, its always been about totalitarian rule. What a pity that we have a President who sees through this crap and calls them out on it.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Thatisall<\/p>\n\"1\"2\"3\"4\"5 (2<\/strong> votes, average: 5.00<\/strong> out of 5)
<\/span><\/span>Loading...<\/span>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n