{"id":27928,"date":"2019-01-25T06:24:56","date_gmt":"2019-01-25T11:24:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=27928"},"modified":"2022-06-08T05:05:41","modified_gmt":"2022-06-08T09:05:41","slug":"fake-mexican-doesnt-like-the-constitution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=27928","title":{"rendered":"Fake Mexican doesn\u2019t like the Constitution"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. Texas dodges a bullet when it reelected Ted Cruz last November over the fake Mexican Robert Francis \u201cBeto\u201d O\u2019Rourke. While the MSM played up how close the race was, as the election results showed, it wasn\u2019t that close at all.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Since then, the \u201cUsual Suspects\u201d in the CommuNazi party have been pushing O’Rourke as the next \u201cBarack Obama.\u201d He certainly is much of an empty suit as Obama, however, he also isn\u2019t all that bright apparently. Last week he gave an interview that was long on hot air and short on actual answers. Here are the details from Fox Ne<\/b>ws<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

Former Texas Senate candidate Beto O’Rourke<\/a> faced across-the-board criticism on Tuesday after an unflattering interview in The Washington Post portrayed him as equivocal and unsure on a variety of substantive policy issues — and included a comment that seemed to question the modern-day relevance of the U.S. Constitution.<\/a> <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

O’Rourke, 46, is widely considered a possible 2020 presidential contender<\/a>, after falling only a few percentage points shy of dethroning incumbent Texas GOP Sen. Ted Cruz in the 2018 midterm elections. But his relative lack of experience and expertise has emerged as a central objection to his prospective candidacy. <\/b><\/p>\n

We suffered through 8 years of mismanagement, incompetence and outright tyranny under the Great Mistake. We\u2019re still learning just how corrupt that SCoaMF was. The last thing this nation needs is another Epic Failure in the Oval Office.<\/p>\n

A<\/b>t one point in the two-hour chat with The Post’s Jenna Johnson<\/a>, O’Rourke openly wondered whether the U.S. can “still be managed by the same principles that were set down 230-plus years ago” in the Constitution. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Needless to say, the response to this moron\u2019s lack of answers and his contempt for the Constitution exploded all over the Internet.<\/p>\n

The comment drew harsh rebukes on Twitter. <\/b><\/p>\n

“This may make it difficult to take any future oath of office to ‘preserve, protect and defend the Constitution,'” Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., wrote. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Benito would have no problem ignoring the Constitution. He\u2019s just a typical Progressive CommuNazi Democrat. They all consider the Constitution nothing more than an impediment to their goals of instituting the soviet style government they all admire so much. Then they asked this empty suit some foreign policy questions. As expected, he whiffed.<\/p>\n

Asked about the planned Syria pullout, he responded that there should be “a debate, a discussion, a national conversation about why we\u2019re there, why we fight, why we sacrifice the lives of American service members, why we\u2019re willing to take the lives of others. … There may be a very good reason to do it. I don\u2019t necessarily understand \u2014 and I\u2019ve been a member of Congress for six years. … We haven\u2019t had a meaningful discussion about these wars since 2003.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

And this idiot thinks he should be president? What\u2019s so hard about this? We don\u2019t need to be there. We have no real interests in that part of the world anymore, other than taking down Iran, supporting Israel and crushing Islamic terrorists.<\/p>\n

Asked whether the U.S. is capable of change, O’Rourke was again equivocal: “I\u2019m hesitant to answer it,” he said, “because I really feel like it deserves its due, and I don\u2019t want to give you a \u2014 actually, just selfishly, I don\u2019t want a sound bite of it reported, but, yeah, I think that\u2019s the question of the moment: Does this still work? Can an empire like ours with military presence in over 170 countries around the globe, with trading relationships . . . and security agreements in every continent, can it still be managed by the same principles that were set down 230-plus years ago?\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

This walking diaper stain is just another over-privileged rich moonbat who thinks that he should be president simply because he wants to be president. We had one of those recently. His name was Barack Obama. He loved all the trappings of being president, but really couldn\u2019t be bothered with little things like administering the government. No, Benito<\/i><\/span> Beto needs to just go away and never bother us with his incompetence and stupidity. Sadly, he might just end up the Democrat Nominee. He\u2019s certainly what this fools look for in leadership these days. Wimpy, indecisive and not all that bright.<\/p>\n

Thatisall<\/p>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n

And, just to annoy Alyssa Milano…<\/p>\n