![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/harpy.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Recently, Attorney general Barr has been making the rounds on Capitol Hill, primarily working on budgeting for the DoJ and various agencies under the control of the Department of Justice. Rather than actually do their jobs, the CommuNazis on the various committees have been demanding that AG Barr break the law and release the entire Mueller report.<\/p>\n
Barr has stated that he expects all the reviews and redaction’s, as required by law, to be completed in a week or so. This hasn\u2019t stopped the CommuNazis from going ballistic. Their screaming is actually covering for their blind terror at what Barr is looking to do, which is investigate how this whole mess with regards to the fake Felonia von Pantsuit paid for Russian Collusion dossier ended up being used for things like FISA warrants and wiretap orders.<\/p>\n
It seems that Attorney General Barr thinks that the court orders were illegally obtained for the express purposes of spying on Donald Trump, his campaign and his transition team, and he actually used the word \u201cSpying.\u201d Here are the details from Fox News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n Prominent Democrats lined up to hammer Attorney General Bill Barr<\/a> for testifying Wednesday that federal authorities had spied on the Trump campaign in 2016, with one top House Democrat charging that Barr is not acting “in the best interest of the DOJ or the country.” <\/b><\/p>\n Me thinks the Democrats doth protest to much. I wonder just what they are afraid he might find? In any case, just what did the Attorney General actually say?<\/p>\n “I think spying did occur,” Barr said during the explosive hearing before a Senate Appropriations subcommittee. “The question is whether it was adequately predicated. \u2026Spying on a political campaign is a big deal.” <\/b><\/p>\n Holy Watergate Batman! This looks suspiciously like Barr has some information on those warrant applications that shows them to have been not entirely truthful. If Comey and the others based their warrant applications to the FISA court on that fake dossier, well, I think some people might be going to jail. Of course, Barr had to dissemble a bit.<\/p>\n Barr later clarified in the hearing: “I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred; I\u2019m saying that I am concerned about it and looking into it, that\u2019s all.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n This clarification actually reinforces his original statement. When he used the word \u201cPredicated\u201d, that was a $5 dollar word that basically means \u201cChecked, double checked and verified as valid,\u201d especially when it was done to a presidential campaign and later to the transition team of the President -Elect of the United States.<\/p>\n Despite mounting evidence<\/a> that the FBI pursued an array of efforts to gather intelligence from within the Trump campaign — and the fact that the FBI successfully pursued warrants<\/a> to surveil a former Trump aide in 2016 — House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., told Fox News that Barr’s loyalties were compromised. <\/b><\/p>\n “He is acting as an employee of the president,” Hoyer said. “I believe the Attorney General believes he needs to protect the president of the United States.” <\/b><\/p>\n Why do I get the feeling that Hoyer is feeling rather nervous? Could it be that he knew some time ago that the whole thing was a fraud and nothing less than a coup attempt? Was he actually a part of this, and meant to act as a back stop for the crooks in the DoJ? Could he be feeling a tad guilty? What did he know and when did he know it?<\/p>\n House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., added in a statement that Barr “should not casually suggest that those under his purview engaged in \u2018spying\u2019 on a political campaign.” <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cThis type of partisan talking point may please Donald Trump, who rails against a \u2018deep state coup,'” Schiff said, “but it also strikes another destructive blow to our democratic institutions. The hardworking men and women at the DOJ and FBI deserve better.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n By the by Schifthead, where\u2019s all that \u201cProof\u201d you\u2019ve been claiming you had that President Trump was a Russian National? What was that? You loaned it out to Felonia von Pantsuit and her senior intelligence analyst, Christopher Steele for a review?<\/p>\n A separate DOJ IG investigation<\/a> into potential FISA abuses by the FBI, which is expected to look at whether the bureau improperly presented misleading sources or withheld exculpatory information in its presentations to the FISA court, is ongoing. Barr said that review is likely to be completed by May or June. <\/b><\/p>\n Hence the panicky remarks by the Congressional Criminal Class<\/i><\/span> Democrat Leadership.<\/p>\n In particular, the FBI assured the FISA court on numerous occasions<\/a> — in the October 2016 warrant application and in subsequent renewals \u2013 that other sources, including a Yahoo News article, independently corroborated Steele’s claims, without evidence to back it up. It later emerged that Steele was also the source of the Yahoo News article, written by reporter Michael Isikoff. <\/b><\/p>\n The FBI also quoted directly<\/a> from a disputed<\/a> Washington Post opinion<\/a> piece to argue that Trump’s views on providing lethal arms to Ukraine, and working toward better relations with Russia, was a possible indicator that the campaign had been compromised. <\/b><\/p>\n I wonder when the Washington ComPost joined the John Birch Society?<\/p>\n Trump’s policy on Ukraine weapons at the time mirrored then-President Obama’s policy.<\/b><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n