![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/original.gif\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
The latest round involves our old friend, Alexandria Occasional-Cortex. She recently called San Fran Nan Pelosi a racist. The rest of coven of moonbats quickly joined in. Now the Democrat leadership is firing back and it\u2019s going to get really nasty. Here are the details from Fox News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n The official House Democratic Caucus Twitter account ripped into Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez<\/a>‘s, D-N.Y. chief of staff Friday for his criticism of another Democratic lawmaker — an astonishing tirade that laid bare the simmering tensions between the freshman congresswoman and her party’s leadership. <\/b><\/p>\n The caucus\u2019 Twitter account flagged a June 27 tweet by Ocasio-Cortez\u2019s chief of staff, Saikat Chakrabarti, in which he criticized Rep. Sharice Davids, D-Kansas, for her votes on issues to do with the migrant crisis at the border.<\/b><\/p>\n Isn\u2019t Occasional-Cortex\u2019s CoS being looked into for skimming about $1 million dollars in campaign donations? In any case, he\u2019s decided to throw the traditional \u201cYou\u2019re racist!\u201d at Pelosi and others.<\/p>\n \u201cI don’t think people have to be personally racist to enable a racist system. And the same could even be said of the Southern Democrats. I don’t believe Sharice is a racist person, but her votes are showing her to enable a racist system,\u201d he tweeted.<\/b><\/p>\n Nice going numbnuts. And, as expected, the Democrat machine opened fire.<\/p>\n On Friday night, the caucus account took aim. <\/b><\/p>\n “Who is this guy and why is he explicitly singling out a Native American woman of color?” it said. <\/b><\/p>\n “Her name is Congresswoman Davids, not Sharice,” the House Democrats added. “She is a phenomenal new member who flipped a red seat blue.” <\/b><\/p>\n “Keep Her Name Out Of Your Mouth,” it said with interspersed emojis of clapping hands.<\/b><\/p>\n I didn\u2019t follow that election so I don\u2019t know how or why Davids was able to defeat the Republican incumbent. Looking at his record, it\u2019s possible the voters got sick of him. Also, it was a midterm election and the number of people who came out to vote was lower then in the general. It will be interesting to see if Davids keeps the seat. Considering the plans announced by the Democrats to end freedom of everything, I suspect she may be a \u201cOne and Done\u201d representative.<\/p>\n I also like how the Democrat Caucus used the phrase \u201cOf color\u201d to describe Davids. It shows just how hung up the Democrats are on valuing skin tone over anything else. By the way, Davids checks all the Progressive boxes. She\u2019s gay and American Indian<\/i><\/span> Native American. Nice shooting by Chakrabarti.<\/p>\n The spat delighted conservatives, who expressed their glee at the eruption of blue-on-blue infighting.<\/b><\/p>\n Chakrabarti, meanwhile, fired back and accused the caucus account of taking his tweet out of the context of a conversation where someone else brought up Davids. <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cI’ve known Rep. Davids for a long time, consider her a friend, and encouraged her to run for Congress back in the fall of 2016,\u201d he said. \u201cI’m glad she did.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n Keep digging dumbass!<\/p>\n “Everything I tweeted 2 weeks ago was to call out the terrible border funding bill that 90+ Dems opposed. It gave Trump a blank check to continue caging people in horrendous conditions. Our Democracy is literally falling apart. I’m not interested in substance-less Twitter spats,” Chakrabarti said in a follow-up tweet. <\/b><\/p>\n In other words, he got his rather tiny wedding tackle caught in the wringer and is trying to get it out.<\/p>\n The spat is the latest flashpoint in a rapidly-escalating feud between the Ocasio-Cortez and top House Democrats, heating up after Congress passed a $4.5 billion border funding bill that Ocasio-Cortez, and freshmen Reps. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., and Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., all opposed.<\/b><\/p>\n The Democrats in general, along with the first term nutcases in particular, are trying to use the mess they caused at the border to destroy President Trump and the Republican party. Being self absorbed idiots, they can\u2019t see that the country in general doesn\u2019t agree with them. It also doesn\u2019t help them when they keep getting caught in one lie after the other.<\/p>\n In an interview last weekend, Pelosi told The New York Times<\/a> that \u201call these people have their public whatever and their Twitter world, but they didn\u2019t have any following. They\u2019re four people, and that\u2019s how many votes they got.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n And that got a really nice and respectful response from Alexandria Occasional-Cortex.<\/p>\n Ocasio-Cortez responded by telling The Washington Post<\/a> this week that the \u201cpersistent singling out\u201d by the speaker was \u201coutright disrespectful\u201d and affected \u201cnewly elected women of color.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n This bimbo has managed to piss off everyone in the DNC, the Democrat Caucus and her own district. She\u2019s just to dense to see it, or if she does, to stupid to care. She thinks that her way is the future. Of course, she, like all \u201cTrue Believers\u201d don\u2019t understand that in the world they want, they would already have been put up against a wall. The \u201cNormal\u201d Democrats are more than happy to remind her that they are now gunning for her.<\/p>\n That remark sparked anger from House Democrats and their aides, who are becoming increasingly impatient with Ocasio-Cortez’s sparring with the speaker. <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cShe is a complete fraud,\u201d one senior Democratic source told Fox News on Friday. <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cHer peers do not take her seriously,\u201d the senior Democratic source said: \u201cThey think it is absurd to call the speaker racist. Offensive and absurd.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n Prominent members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) also sided with Pelosi and criticized Ocasio-Cortez for her remarks.. <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cIt was such a weak argument to say she was being picked on and that four women of color were being picked on by the speaker,\u201d Rep. William Lacy Clay, D-Mo., a member of the CBC, said Thursday night. \u201cIt shows their lack of sensitivity to racism. To fall back on that [trope] is a weak argument. It has no place in a civil discussion.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n