![](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/i.pinimg.com\/originals\/b2\/77\/57\/b2775785a7ba8596019b93b18045aea4.png?resize=479%2C250&ssl=1\")
<\/p>\nGood day all. San Francisco used to be called the \u201cCity by the Bay.\u201d Now it\u2019s considered the \u201cCity buried in shit,\u201d quite literally. Thanks to the Progressive Liberal Democrats who have been ruining the city for decades, San Francisco is devolving into a city of the type you see in the Turd World.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
With rampant crime, homelessness and a huge gap developing between the rich and poor, what do you think the San Francisco board of supervisors considered their most important task? It\u2019s declaring a group they don\u2019t like to be a terrorist organization. In this case, they are saying that since the National Rifle Association won\u2019t walk away from the 2nd<\/sup> Amendment of the United States Constitution, then they are responsible for criminals using firearms and thus, are terrorists. Here are the details from KQED<\/b>:<\/p>\n The San Francisco Board of Supervisors unanimously passed a resolution Tuesday declaring the National Rifle Association a domestic terrorist organization and urging other municipalities, states and the federal government to do the same. <\/b><\/p>\n The resolution<\/a> calls out the NRA for inciting acts of violence and spreading “misinformation and propaganda” and encourages the city to assess and limit contracts with vendors affiliated with the NRA. It stops short, though, of putting in place any enforcement mechanisms or new regulations.<\/b><\/p>\n So, because the NRA and it\u2019s members use lawful means to defend the Constitutional rights of all Americans, they are terrorists and must be punished.<\/p>\n “The NRA conspires to limit gun violence research, restrict gun violence data sharing and most importantly aggressively tries to block every piece of sensible gun violence prevention legislation proposed on any level, local state or federal,” said Supervisor Catherine Stefani, who sponsored the measure. <\/b><\/p>\n A longtime advocate for gun safety, Stefani also introduced a resolution earlier this year that authorized the San Francisco Police Department to use funds from the U.S. Department of Justice to help improve the collection, management and analysis of gun-crime evidence. <\/b><\/p>\n “When they use phrases like, ‘I’ll give you my gun when you pry it from my cold, dead hands’ on bumper stickers, they are saying reasoned debate about public safety should be met with violence,” she said. <\/b><\/p>\n Obviously, this petty little tyrant never heard or read the Constitution. Funny, I thought that in order to pass the Bar, (This failed porn star is a lawyer), you had to have some knowledge of the Constitution of the United States as amended. Of course, this is Kalifornistan, and the Constitution has been revoked out there.<\/p>\n She also doesn\u2019t seem to comprehend the actual meaning \u201cFrom my cold dead hands.\u201d It doesn\u2019t mean that the gun owners are going to start something, they are going to be responding to a tyrannical government that is moving against the citizens. In other words, it\u2019s a reactive statement.<\/p>\n Tuesday’s resolution notes America’s “epidemic of gun violence, including over 36,000 deaths, and 100,000 injuries each year.” It also highlights the striking frequency of mass shootings nationwide, specifically noting a massacre in nearby Gilroy in July that left four people dead, including two children.<\/b><\/p>\n Those statistics come with a very large caveat. They cover everything involving a firearm, including police involved shootings, lawful self defense, accidents and suicides. There is also another statistic that isn\u2019t mentioned, the use of a firearm defensively even when no shot is fired.<\/p>\n The recent spate of criminals committing murder with firearms also doesn\u2019t mention how many of the victims were armed and shooting back. Why? Because none of them were for any number of reasons. The major reason is usually the crime scene is also a gun free zone and no one is allowed to have a gun.<\/p>\n In addition, it mentions a notable increase in hate crimes since 2015, and the growing number of guns in the U.S., which currently exceeds the country\u2019s total population.<\/b><\/p>\n In the eyes of a progressive liberal democrat, a \u201cHate Crime\u201d is anything that goes against the doctrine of the Progressive Liberal totalitarian elite. If you stick your tongue out at someone, Progressives will scream \u201cHATE CRIME!!!\u201d Another term for hate crime is thought crime. It\u2019s a bogus term used to add more charges to people who may have committed actual crimes. Of course, to be charged with a hate crime, you have to be white, and not a barking moonbat leftist.<\/p>\n Of course, the NRA had no choice but to respond to these Totalitarian scumbags.<\/p>\n In a statement before the vote, NRA spokeswoman Amy Hunter said, “This ludicrous stunt by the Board of Supervisors is an effort to distract from the real problems facing San Francisco, such as rampant homelessness, drug abuse and skyrocketing petty crime.” <\/b><\/p>\n “The board is wasting taxpayer dollars to declare five million law-abiding Americans domestic terrorists, and it\u2019s shameful,” she added. <\/b><\/p>\n Actually, in the minds of the CommuNazi totalitarians ruining San Francisco, it\u2019s a perfectly sensible expenditure of scarce resources. Using the money to fight catch criminals, deal with the problems of homeless, mentally ill people, and improving the quality of life of the taxpayers doesn\u2019t even show up on their radar.<\/p>\n I\u2019ve been talking with friends about this idiocy. One of the questions that we have been debating is, would NRA members be subject to arrest in San Francisco? In other words, if I were walking along and wearing my NRA life member hat, would the police threaten to kill me if I moved while taking in the view of San Francisco Bay? Will businesses that happen to have a relationship with the NRA be subject to police raids and orders to shut down?<\/p>\n While all that sounds absolutely ludicrous, with the mindset of the Progressives running the city, it isn\u2019t actually beyond the realm of possibility. Could I, a life member of the NRA, while visiting San Francisco, be subject to being stopped and searched only due to my membership? I have little doubt that this idea has crossed the minds of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, and in a positive light.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/full-retard.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n