{"id":29831,"date":"2019-11-11T13:10:45","date_gmt":"2019-11-11T18:10:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=29831"},"modified":"2019-11-11T13:10:45","modified_gmt":"2019-11-11T18:10:45","slug":"why-is-schifthead-afraid-to-let-the-whistleblower-testify","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=29831","title":{"rendered":"Why is Schifthead afraid to let the whistleblower testify?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. Now that the star chamber tribunals are ramping up to \u201cGet Trump!\u201d the Republicans are demanding to hear from certain people. One of these is the \u201cAnonymous\u201d whistleblower who started this impeachment nonsense.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

There is just one problem. The ever so honest and fair, Representative Adam Schifthead is refusing to allow the person who started this to testify to his committee. Here are some of the details from Fox News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

House Intelligence Committee Chairman <\/b>Adam Schiff<\/b><\/u><\/span><\/a>, D-Calif., rejected a request by <\/b>Republicans<\/a> <\/b><\/u><\/span>to have the <\/b>Ukraine<\/b><\/u><\/span><\/a> phone call whistleblower testify at next week’s public <\/b>impeachment inquiry<\/a> <\/b><\/u><\/span>hearings, saying that their testimony was “redundant and unnecessary.”<\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Excuse me? Redundant and unnecessary? Since when? This was the clown that started all this. Of course, it\u2019s possible that Schifthead doesn\u2019t want this liar to appear for several very simple reasons. First, we already know that he has no first hand information. He wasn\u2019t on the call and never heard a recording or saw a transcript until President Trump had it released.<\/p>\n

Then their has been the information that this fraud was thrown out of the White House for leaking information, and that he\u2019s also working for the Biden campaign. Finally, there is the question of when Schifthead actually got involved with the whistleblower. There is credible information that it was Schifthead\u2019s office that helped the liar write his report.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

These are the real reasons Schifthead and the Democrats don\u2019t want this clown anywhere near the Republicans. They will ask some very pointed questions and if the subject lies or refuses to answer, it further destroys his credibility. (Not that he actually has any) However, Schifthead has an excuse of his own to keep him from testifying.<\/p>\n

“The committee \u2026 will not facilitate efforts by President Trump and his allies in Congress to threaten, intimidate and retaliate against the whistleblower who courageously raised the initial alarm,” Schiff said in a letter to Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes, R-Calif. ” … The whistleblower has a right under laws championed by this committee to remain anonymous and to be protected from harm.”<\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Actually, the laws don\u2019t do that. What they do is protect a real whistleblower from being retaliated against professionally. There is nothing in the statutes, to my knowledge, that allow for anonymous accusations. As I mentioned, what Schifthead is really afraid of is that the Whisleblower, not wanting to go to prison for lying to congress, might just admit that the whole thing was a fraud cooked up by Adam Schifthead.<\/p>\n

“The impeachment inquiry, moreover, has gathered an ever-growing body of evidence — from witnesses and documents, including the president’s own words in his July 25 call record — that not only confirms but far exceeds the initial information in the whistleblower’s complaint … ” Schiff concluded his letter. “In light of the president’s threats, the individual’s appearance before us would only place their personal safety at grave risk.” <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The only \u201cEvidence\u201d Schifthead has is what he\u2019s manufactured. The man is a proven liar. All during the Mueller Inquisition, Schifthead was announcing that he had \u201cHard Evidence\u201d that President Trump was colluding with the Russians. When the Mueller inquisition failed, the Republicans demanded that Shifthead provide the \u201cProof\u201d he claimed he had. He didn\u2019t because there was none. He lied.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Since he started in his latest coup plot against President Trump, he has been caught out lying again and again, to the point of putting proven falsehoods into the congressional record. This was after President Trump released the actual transcript and the liar, Adam Schifthead read a made up version into the record making it appear to be real. He later claimed this was a parody, but it wasn\u2019t.<\/p>\n

Earlier in his letter, Schiff had warned Nunes that the impeachment inquiry and the House Intelligence Committee “will not serve as vehicles” for what he called “sham investigations into the Bidens or debunked conspiracies about 2016 U.S. election interference that President Trump pressed Ukraine to conduct for his personal political benefit.” <\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

To bad for the liar that the Bidens are looking really bad right about now. It\u2019s not only the proven fact that Vice President Joe \u201cThe Groper\u201d Biden used his office to pressure the Ukraine into firing an investigator who was looking into Hunter Biden and the company he \u201cworked for,\u201d There is new information that Hunter Biden was also dealing with the Chinese in an actual quid pro quo that benefited his father.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The Republicans on the committee put out a list of people they wanted to hear from, all leading to the probable fact that Joe Biden actually did what Schifthead is accusing President Trump of doing.<\/p>\n

Republicans noted that testimony from former State Department official George Kent raised concerns about “the appearance of a conflict of interest stemming from Mr. Biden’s position on Burisma’s board,” and added that former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovich was prepared by the Obama State Department to address questions about Mr. Biden’s position on Burisma during her Senate confirmation process.<\/b><\/p>\n

Marie Yovanovich also testified regarding the call with the Ukrainian President. However, she has been pretty thoroughly discredited. She was an Obama holdover and actively worked against President Trump\u2019s foreign policy. He ended up firing her.<\/p>\n

Republicans also planned to call the younger Biden’s former long-time business partner, Devon Archer, who also sat on the board of Burisma. Republicans claim Archer can help the public to understand “the nature and extent of Ukraine’s pervasive corruption information that bears directly on President Trump’s longstanding and deeply-held skepticism of the country.” <\/b><\/p>\n

One major hole in the Democrats plans to \u201cGet Trump!\u201d is a document signed by Bill \u201cBubba Horndog\u201d Clinton that requires the President to look into corruption before approving the sending of aid to the Ukraine. From what I understand, it\u2019s pretty bad over there. However, the President of the Ukraine didn\u2019t know that the aid had been withheld, and it was released soon after. As for the investigation President Trump was inquiring about? That hasn\u2019t happened either. So, where is the quid pro quo? It’s not there. None of this matters to the lying weasel, Adam Schifthead. He won\u2019t allow anything to stand in his way to \u201cGet Trump!!!\u201d<\/p>\n

“Because President Trump should be afforded an opportunity to confront his accusers, the anonymous whistleblower should testify,” Nunes wrote in his letter to Schiff earlier Saturday. “Moreover, given the multiple discrepancies between the whistleblower’s complaint and the closed-door testimony of the witnesses, it is imperative that the American people hear definitively how the whistleblower developed his or her information, and who else the whistleblower may have fed the information he or she gathered and how that treatment of classified information may have led to the false narrative being perpetrated by the Democrats during this process.” <\/b><\/p>\n

Republicans are also requesting that the “more than half a dozen sources” the whistleblower cited in their complaint to the Intelligence Community Inspector General, whose identities also remain anonymous, attend for a public deposition.<\/b><\/p>\n

These \u201cHalf dozen sources\u201d cited by the whistleblower need to be questioned. The whole report to the Inspector General was nothing more then hearsay evidence, which is not allowed into a courtroom. (I understand that it would have been rejected by the IG, but he changed the rules to allow it in) Granted, these hearings aren\u2019t a court of law, however, the American People expect the forms of a courtroom to be honored, such as letting the defense provide a defense, question witnesses and face the accuser. None of that is going to happen as far as Schifthead is concerned.<\/p>\n

Personally, I think that the Democrats will impeach President Trump on blatantly obvious fake charges. It will happen along a party line vote. (The impeachment process only requires a majority vote in the House of Representatives. The Senate part requires I believe a two thirds majority to convict) When this gets to the Senate, with the Republicans in charge, if this isn\u2019t laughed out right away, then you can expect the whistleblower and all the others Schifthead and the Democrats are protecting to be called.<\/p>\n

You can also expect that Adam Schifthead himself will be called, put under oath and forced to testify. If he lies and is caught, he will be charged with perjury. In fact, the worst case scenario for the House Democrats could be a review of all this and potential charges of attempting to overthrow the government. (I\u2019m not sure we could use treason. That is very specific. Sedition perhaps? Hello Legal eagles!! We need you assistance here!)<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The hatred of President Trump by the Democrats has twisted them so badly that the next election could be and should be an even worse blowout than the 2010 midterms. If they ram through an impeachment and it\u2019s party line, it will look to many people that it was the Democrats who have refused to accept the 2016 election, and that they have been working to overturn it since November 9th <\/sup>2016.<\/p>\n

The economy is going gangbusters, unemployment is at historic lows and all the Democrats are promising is massive tax increases, massive regulations, stripping away individual liberties and rights and a collapsing economy. Adding in an attempted coup, because this is exactly what it is, might convince enough voters to turn out 80+ Democrat members of the house and 5-10 Democrat Senators. 2020 is going to be an interesting year.<\/p>\n

Thatisall<\/p>\n\"1\"2\"3\"4\"5 (2<\/strong> votes, average: 5.00<\/strong> out of 5)
<\/span><\/span>Loading...<\/span>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n

\u00a0