{"id":29875,"date":"2019-11-18T06:12:14","date_gmt":"2019-11-18T11:12:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=29875"},"modified":"2019-11-18T06:12:14","modified_gmt":"2019-11-18T11:12:14","slug":"impeachment-by-focus-group","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=29875","title":{"rendered":"Impeachment by focus group?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. Since the plan to impeach President Trump for a \u201cquid pro quo\u201d with the Ukrainian President is falling apart, the Democrats have decided to accuse the President of bribery.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

They came to this conclusion not through investigations, but by listening to a \u201cFocus Group\u201d instead. Here are the details from Fox News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

Goodbye \u201cquid pro quo.\u201d Hello \u201cbribery.\u201d<\/p>\n

Democrats are shifting the language they use to describe the allegations against President Trump<\/a> in the House impeachment inquiry<\/a>. And that change has come after the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee recently conducted focus groups to determine which description sounds more damning to voters, The Washington Post reported.<\/a> <\/b><\/p>\n

The paper said the DCCC conducted these focus groups in key House battlegrounds and asked participants whether \u201cquid pro quo,\u201d \u201cextortion\u201d or \u201cbribery\u201d was more compelling. \u201cBribery\u201d was determined to be more effective. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Top Democrats have already begun changing the way they characterize Trump\u2019s conversations with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky about military aid and his desire for the country to launch investigations related to the Bidens and the 2016 election. On Thursday, talking to reporters, Speaker Nancy Pelosi said, \u201cQuid pro quo: Bribery.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

Referencing how Trump has repeatedly said his call with Zelensky was perfect, Pelosi said: \u201cIt\u2019s perfectly wrong. It\u2019s bribery.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

First, the Democrats are using a focus group to find the best way to overturn the 2016 election and remove a sitting president? I would ask if they\u2019re insane, but we already know they are. As to bribery, where the Hell is that coming from? (Other then from the delusional brain of a moonbat) If they are trying to say that the Aid package was a bribe, then guess what? Barack Obama is the next one to go after. Why is that you ask? Might I remind you of several bribes paid by the Obama Administration such as the $150 billion in hard currency they shipped to Iran?<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

No, what we\u2019re seeing no is the desperation play by the Democrats. They know that the claim of a quid pro quo is already failing, and as we\u2019ve seen so far, the \u201cwitnesses\u201d that have appeared before the Adam Schifthead Clown Show have shown they have no actual information and have come across as a bunch of whining crybabies.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

This is all an attempt to do whatever it takes to get President Trump out of office, preferably by impeachment and conviction, (which isn\u2019t going to happen), or by so wrecking him that he loses the 2020 election. The Democrats should have another focus group made up of people other then Democrats and ask them what they think will happen if they get their way and put a Fascist such as Elizabeth Warren or a communist such as Bernie Sanders into the White House. I think we all can guess the answer, and it would be in the \u201cBad things best avoided\u201d department.<\/p>\n

A focus group? Sheesh!<\/p>\n

Thatisall<\/p>\n\"1\"2\"3\"4\"5 (1<\/strong> votes, average: 5.00<\/strong> out of 5)
<\/span><\/span>Loading...<\/span>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n

\u00a0