![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/schadenboner.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
One of the ways that the Democrats steal elections is by using the names of people who once lived in the district, but wither moved away or died. There have been instances where there were upwards of 50 people registered at an address their was either a single family home, or a vacant lot. Getting these fake voters off the rolls should be a no brainer, but this would mean the Democrats ability to steal elections would be thwarted.<\/p>\n
To prevent this, they have been suing everywhere to stop things like requiring an ID to vote or to have the voting rolls validated to show the people on them actually existed. Now they are starting to lose these suits as people wise up. Still, you have cases where local officials won\u2019t clean up the voter roles. Now a judge in Wisconsin has lowered the boom on one state\u2019s election commission and ordered them to clean out the voter rolls. Here are the details from Fox News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n A Wisconsin judge on Monday found the state\u2019s Elections Commission<\/a> and three of its members in contempt of court and ordered the commission to remove up to 209,000 names from the state’s voter rolls, in a case that could have major implications later this year in a key battleground state<\/a>. <\/b><\/p>\n Of course it will have major implications! This will cut deeply into the standard Democrat margin of fraud. Why President Trump might actually carry the state by an even wider margin this time.<\/p>\n Saying in his ruling that \u201ctime is of the essence,\u201d Judge Paul Malloy said that there is no time to wait for the case to make its way to the Wisconsin Supreme Court and ordered that the state pay $50 a day until it starts removing people from the voter rolls. <\/b><\/p>\n Wow! That\u2019s really hitting them in the wallet. (That was sarcasm in case you missed it)<\/p>\n Malloy also ordered that the three Democrats on the commission \u2013 Ann Jacobs, Julie Glancy and Mark Thomsen \u2013 pay $250 a day each. The state Justice Department asked Malloy to stay his order of contempt pending an appeal of his ruling, but the judge denied the request. <\/b><\/p>\n Hmm, now that will sting. Looks like the Democrats on the commission are going to have to up their intake of graft and bribes.<\/p>\n “I can\u2019t be any clearer than this,” Malloy said, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel<\/a>. “They need to follow my order.” <\/b><\/p>\n State Democrats in Wisconsin are fighting the lawsuit, saying the purge would unfairly affect their voters.<\/b><\/p>\n By this, I assume you mean the deceased, illegal aliens and people who have moved out of state or to another voting district?<\/p>\n Those bringing the lawsuit argue that the state elections commission, which includes an equal number of Republicans and Democrats, broke the law when it did not remove voters from the rolls who did not respond within 30 days to a mailing in October indicating they may have moved. <\/b><\/p>\n And the Democrats would prefer to wait until later in the year to clean up the rolls. How much later you ask?<\/p>\n The commission wanted to wait until after the November 2020 presidential election before it removed anyone because of inaccuracies with a previous round of data identifying voters who had potentially moved. <\/b><\/p>\n So, basically, they wanted to wait until they could steal the election and make sure President Trump lost the state this time.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n