{"id":30285,"date":"2020-02-04T06:08:39","date_gmt":"2020-02-04T11:08:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=30285"},"modified":"2020-02-04T06:08:39","modified_gmt":"2020-02-04T11:08:39","slug":"nancy-pelosi-calls-for-trumps-lawyers-to-be-disbarred","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=30285","title":{"rendered":"Nancy Pelosi calls for Trump\u2019s lawyers to be disbarred"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. As the Democrat coup attempt collapses in the United States Senate, certain Democrats, Ok, all of the Democrats are going completely off their rockers, especially San Fran Nan Pelosi. She\u2019s now demanding that President Trump\u2019s lawyers be disbarred.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

San Fran Nan has never been what you might call, tightly wrapped. Over the last few years, she\u2019s been showing signs of serious mental decline. Now that the impeachment against President Trump is about to be toss into the ash heap of history by the Senate, San Fran Nan has decided that it\u2019s all the fault of President Trump\u2019s lawyers, and she wants them disbarred. Here are the details from Fox News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

In scathing comments Thursday as her party appeared on the verge of defeat in the Senate impeachment trial<\/a>, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi<\/a> argued that President Trump “cannot be acquitted” if the trial lacks the witness testimony and documentation that Democrats have been seeking. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Well Nancy, you might have wanted to study how the impeachment process works. It\u2019s the job of the House of Representatives to do all the investigatory work, including interviewing witnesses and getting the documents you want. The Senate\u2019s job is to listen to the managers present their case, provide the evidence and all that stuff. It isn’t to do the investigative work.<\/p>\n

Instead you let Adam Schifthead run a soviet style star chamber investigation. That investigation violated most parts of the Constitution, including little things like letting President Trump face his accuser, (The Democrat Operative working for you), letting his legal team call their witnesses and generally not hiding in a secret bunker.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The San Francisco Democrat also fired on Trump’s impeachment defense team, saying they’ve “disgraced themselves” during this week’s trial and suggesting they deserve disbarment over their trial remarks.<\/b><\/p>\n

You mean they had the gumption to actually do their jobs and provide a solid defense for the President of the United States? What did you want them to do? Say President Trump is guilty of everything on earth and resign? Face facts fathead. You have once again managed to blow things up for the Democrat party. It\u2019s doubtful you will be speaker next year.<\/p>\n

The comments came hours before Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., said he would not back efforts<\/a> by Democrats to have witnesses testify at the Senate trial \u2013 all but sealing an acquittal for Trump. <\/b><\/p>\n

One of the reasons the Senate won\u2019t allow witnesses to be called, besides it not being their job, is that if they did, then President Trump would also be calling witnesses, and making you look even worse then you already do. In other words, they are trying, (For whatever reason), to save you from yourself.<\/p>\n

“He will not be acquitted,” Pelosi insisted during her weekly news conference, according to Politico<\/a>. \u201cYou cannot be acquitted if you don\u2019t have a trial. You don\u2019t have a trial if you don\u2019t have witnesses and documentation and all of that. Does the president know right from wrong? I don’t think so.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Yeah, actually he will be. The fact of the matter is, the charges you brought are laughable. They have no basis in the law or the constitution. Yes, technically, you can impeach the President for putting ketchup on his steak, but realistically, people expect that when a president is impeached, he actually committed some sort of crime, you know, like President Bubbah Horndog back in the 90\u2019s.<\/p>\n

He lied under oath and obstructed justice. What you tried to do was overthrow the sitting president on charges that were laughable. Obstructing congress? That\u2019s part of the job description dummy. If you had bothered to follow the process, and weren\u2019t so hot to ram this through, you would have gone to court and challenged President Trump on the executive privilege question. That you didn\u2019t, plus sitting on the impeachment for a month pretty much ended the whole thing before it got started.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, Pelosi\u2019s comments about Trump\u2019s legal team were equally combative. <\/b><\/p>\n

“I don’t know how they can retain their lawyer status, in the comments that they’re making,” Pelosi told reporters, according to The Hill. “I don’t think they made the case. I think they disgraced themselves terribly in terms of their violation of what our Constitution is about and what a president’s behavior should be.” <\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Pelosi also accused other Trump allies of attempting \u201cto dismantle the Constitution\u201d in order to shield the president from conviction and removal from office over two articles of impeachment that the Democrat-controlled House approved in December. <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cSome of them are even lawyers,\u201d Pelosi said. \u201cImagine that you would say \u2014 ever, of any president, no matter who he or she is or whatever party — if the president thinks that his or her presidency … is good for the country, then any action is justified \u2014 including encouraging a foreign government to have an impact on our elections.” <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201c[That] is exactly what our Founders were opposed to \u2014 and they feared,\u201d she added, according to The Hill<\/a>. \u201cI don’t think they made the case. I think they disgraced themselves terribly in terms of their violation of what our Constitution is about and what a president’s behavior should be.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Considering the utter contempt the Democrats have historically had for the Constitution you demented hag, your remarks are laughable. Your hatred of President Trump and the people he represents has led you to nothing less then to attempt to overthrow the duly elected President of the United States. Personally, once this is all said and done, I think it will be time for President Trump to start investigating you.<\/p>\n

Pelosi has faced her own share of criticism for stalling the impeachment process for about a month \u2013 by withholding the approved articles of impeachment from the Senate, seeking leverage in setting the parameters of the Senate trial — after initially calling for \u201curgency\u201d while House panels were holding their impeachment inquiries. <\/b><\/p>\n

President Trump and other Republicans argued that Pelosi slowed down the process at least in part because she viewed the Democrats\u2019 chances of winning a conviction of Trump in the Senate to be weak. <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cWe know their case is not strong and now they want to change the rules,\u201d House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said during an appearance on \u201cFox & Friends\u201d<\/a> in early January, referring to Senate Democrats\u2019 call for witnesses at the trial. <\/b><\/p>\n

It\u2019s actually worse then that. San Fran Nan was actually attempting to dictate how things should be done in the Senate. Since her grasp of the Constitution is very weak, allow me to provide some light reading. In this case, it\u2019s Article One, Section 5<\/a>, Clause 2. Each house of Congress makes their own rules regarding themselves. You run the House of Representatives, (For now), and Mitch McConnell runs the Senate. You have no say at all over how things are done in the Senate and never will.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Meanwhile, now that the vote on whether or not to allow witnesses had been taken, and the vote was in the negative, the only thing left is the vote to acquit President Trump. While you might try to pull this impeachment stunt again prior to the election, I wouldn\u2019t recommend it. The next time McConnell and the others might just hold a quick vote 15 minutes after you send Schifthead the Liar and No Nads Nadler over with another Impeachment case.<\/p>\n

Your attempt to overthrow President Trump is being seen for what it is. A coup plot right out of the 7 Days in May<\/b><\/a>. Not only did you fail, but now the very people you were counting on to keep your wrinkly, senile old ass in the Speakers chair have turned against the Democrats and are supporting President Trump in greater numbers then ever. Stick the fork in, San Fran Nan is just about done.<\/p>\n

Thatisall<\/p>\n\"1\"2\"3\"4\"5 (2<\/strong> votes, average: 5.00<\/strong> out of 5)
<\/span><\/span>Loading...<\/span>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n