![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/shocked-face.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
First, the Mueller prosecutors who brought the case told the Department of Justice they were going to ask for a couple of years. Then, in Court, they asked for up to 10 years, insuring that Roger Stone would die behind bars. This blatant action caused the DoJ to step in and ask for a much lighter sentence in line with what they were told. The four Mueller prosecutors \u201cResigned in protest\u201d over this.<\/p>\n
It then came out that one of the jurors, the foreman actually, was blatantly anti-Trump, and was fairly biased against Roger Stone. Her words and actions on social media were so bad, that even Never Trumper judge Andrew Napolitano said that he would have declared a mistrial and ordered a new trial.<\/p>\n
Then there is the judge who sat on this case. She is, to no one\u2019s surprise, an Obama judge. She appears to have prevented the defense team from challenging some of the jurors, as well as suppressed Roger Stone\u2019s 1st<\/sup> Amendment rights. Still, the big story was the juror who appears to have come in determined to convict Roger Stone no matter what. Here are some of the details on this mess from Fox News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n Former Memphis City Schools Board President Tomeka Hart revealed Wednesday that she was the foreperson of the jury that convicted former Trump adviser Roger Stone on obstruction charges last year — and soon afterward, her history of Democratic activism and a string of her anti-Trump, left-wing social media posts came to light. <\/b><\/p>\n Hart even posted specifically about the Stone case<\/a> before she was selected to sit on the jury, as she retweeted an argument mocking those who considered Stone’s dramatic arrest in a predawn raid<\/a> by a federal tactical team to be excessive force. She also suggested President Trump and his supporters are racist and praised the investigation conducted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, which ultimately led to Stone’s prosecution.<\/b><\/p>\n This woman should have been released 2 minutes after she arrived for jury duty. Instead, any challenges regarding her objectivity were apparently suppressed by the judge, speaking of which:<\/p>\n Meanwhile, it emerged<\/a> that U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson had denied a defense request to strike a potential juror who was Obama-era press official with admitted anti-Trump views — and whose husband worked<\/a> at the same Justice Department division that handled the probe<\/a> leading to Stone’s arrest. And, another Stone juror, Seth Cousins<\/a>, donated to former Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke and other progressive causes, federal election records<\/a> reviewed by Fox News show. <\/b><\/p>\n This whole case is now blowing up in the faces of the Deep State and they know it. While I\u2019m not a lawyer, there appears to my unschooled eye to be more then enough to have the verdict overturned on appeal and at the very least, a new trial held, if not a directed verdict of acquittal. (Again, not a lawyer…Thank God!)<\/p>\n The drama began when Hart confirmed to CNN and other media organizations Wednesday that she had written a Facebook post supporting the Justice Department prosecutors in the Stone case who abruptly stepped down from their posts on Tuesday<\/a>, saying she “can’t keep quiet any longer.” The prosecutors apparently objected after senior DOJ officials overrode their recommendation to Jackson that Stone face up to 9 years in prison.<\/b><\/p>\n “I want to stand up for Aaron Zelinsky, Adam Jed, Michael Marando, and Jonathan Kravis — the prosecutors on the Roger Stone trial,” Hart wrote in the post. “It pains me to see the DOJ now interfere with the hard work of the prosecutors. They acted with the utmost intelligence, integrity, and respect for our system of justice.” <\/b><\/p>\n Congratulations dimbulb. In typical Moonbat manner, you just blew up the entire case and put yourself at risk of prosecution for lying under oath. Your statements demonstrate that you had extensive knowledge of the case and supported the conviction of Mr. Stone before the case was heard. I hope they toss your lying Progressive ass into a deep dark cell.<\/p>\n Independent journalist Mike Cernovich, not CNN, then first reported<\/a> that a slew of Hart’s other publicly available Twitter and Facebook posts readily suggested a strong political bias. Some of Hart’s posts were written as Stone’s trial was in progress. <\/b><\/p>\n And there are other grounds for appeal right there. I believe that if you are on a jury, you are not supposed to talk about the case outside of the court room, and even in the court room, you are limited in where and when to talk about it. Hart\u2019s Twitter posts indicate that she is a hard core leftist, hates President Trump and anyone who doesn\u2019t agree with her world view is a racist. It\u2019s looking better and better for Mr. Stone and worse for Ms. Hart.<\/p>\n Most of Hart’s posts were from before she was selected to sit on the Stone jury late 2019. But, on Nov. 15, 2019 — the day she voted to convict Stone on seven counts of obstruction, witness tampering and making false statements to Congress — Hart tweeted two “heart” emojis<\/a>, followed by two pump-fist emojis.<\/b><\/p>\n If Hart have provided misleading answers on her jury form concerning her political or social media activity, her views on Trump and the Russia probe, or other related matters, there could be grounds for Stone’s team to seek a new trial, legal experts told Fox News.<\/b><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n