![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/climatologyreligion.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Privately, it\u2019s another matter. There is no way the CommuNazis will willingly give up on the Green New Deal, especially since it all but guarantees the restoration of the slave state they\u2019ve been wanting since 1865. Now someone has come up with the actual costs to people if this disaster were ever to be implemented. Here are the horrifying details from Fox New<\/a>s<\/b>:<\/p>\n A new study claims that progressives’ Green New Deal (GND)<\/a> would impose around $75,000 in average annual costs for households in key battleground states \u2013 raising questions as to how climate<\/a> politics will impact voter sentiment going into the 2020 elections.<\/b><\/p>\n The report<\/a>, released by the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) and Power the Future on Wednesday, builds upon a previous study <\/a>from the organization last summer. Using updated data, the group found that within the first year of implementation, the GND would cost households an average of between $74,287 and $76,683 in 10 states — Colorado ($74,287), Florida ($76,109), Iowa ($76,683), Michigan ($74,470), New Hampshire ($74,723), New Mexico ($74,432), North Carolina ($74,609), Ohio ($75,807), Pennsylvania ($75,307), and Wisconsin ($75,252). <\/b><\/p>\n Those figures incorporate the cost of electricity production within the first year of the program, a one-time upgrade to vehicles and housing, as well as shipping and logistics costs incurred from GND mandates.<\/b><\/p>\n So basically, every penny I make in my Real World Job will go to paying for this disaster? Yeah, I don\u2019t think so Tim.<\/p>\n CEI also examined Alaska, which would purportedly face $84,584 in average annual household costs during the GND’s first year. While the costs for each of the states declined in the following years, they all faced more than $39,000 in average annual household costs in the long term (six years or more).<\/b><\/p>\n You know that this is actually on the low side. People who run these projections tend to keep them on the conservative side. In the real world, things like this usually end up two to three times higher.<\/p>\n Because the GND is so sweeping in its goals, it was difficult for CEI to fully account for the true costs of implementation. And it’s unclear how Democratic spending would help mitigate the costs incurred by households.<\/b><\/p>\n Another reason they were probably very conservative in their figures. The reality of the Green New Deal, if implemented, would be far, far worse for the average American.<\/p>\n \u201cThe Green New Deal would effectively destroy America\u2019s energy industry, and with it, our entire economy,\u201d added Turner, the executive director of Power the Future, which partnered with CEI on the project. <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cRight now, our booming national economy and record low unemployment rate is driven by abundant, domestic, reliable, and inexpensive energy produced by millions of men and women across the country,” he said. “Any policy that proposes to reverse this success is a threat to jobs, to rural communities, to national security, and to the very prosperity that Americans are experiencing.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n