![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/hillary-shocked.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
For those of you who, like all accused Progressives, can\u2019t remember anything, Felonia von Pantsuit ran her own unsecured private email server while she was Secretary of State. When this was discovered, she ordered it wiped so that any incriminating emails would be destroyed. Unfortunately for Felonia, it didn\u2019t work and most of the messages, including some highly classified ones that had no business being on an unsecured server, were recovered. Now she is being ordered to explain herself under oath. Here are the details from Fox News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n A federal judge Monday granted a request from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch to have former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton<\/a> sit for a sworn deposition to answer questions about her use of a private email server to conduct government business.<\/b><\/p>\n Judicial Watch has been an absolute pain in the ass for the Deep State members of the Beltway Uniparty. They have found details that the FBI and DoJ missed. (Or never actually wanted to find) Felonia, of course, is trying to wiggle out of this order, but isn\u2019t having much luck.<\/p>\n Clinton has argued that she has already answered questions about this and should not have to do so again — the matter did not result in any charges for the then-presidential candidate in 2016 after a high-profile investigation \u2013 but D.C. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth said in his ruling that her past responses left much to be desired.<\/b><\/p>\n Oh I love that remark, Felonia\u2019s past responses leaving much to be desired? She flat out lied under oath repeatedly, along with her staffers and was allowed to skate because she was supposed to be the President right now. Funny how things worked out, isn\u2019t it Felonia?<\/p>\n “As extensive as the existing record is, it does not sufficiently explain Secretary Clinton\u2019s state of mind when she decided it would be an acceptable practice to set up and use a private server to conduct State Department business,” Lamberth said.<\/b><\/p>\n Oh I can answer that one Judge. Felonia set up that server so she would have absolute control over it. Considering the corruption of the Clintons, (Uranium One, Benghazi, The Clinton Slush fund<\/i><\/span> Foundation, etc), her mindset is simple. She wanted to be able to destroy the evidence of her criminal activities, which is exactly what she attempted to do.<\/p>\n The judge went on to recognize that while Clinton responded to written questions in a separate case, “those responses were either incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory at best. Simply put her responses left many more questions than answers.\u201d Lamberth said that using written questions this time \u201cwill only muddle any understanding of Secretary Clinton\u2019s state of mind and fail to capture the full picture, thus delaying the final disposition of this case even further.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n Delaying the case is exactly what Felonia von Pantsuit has in mind. While most of her criminal activities are now beyond the reach of the law, thanks to the Statute of Limitations, (Something Felonia truly admires and has used repeatedly. Think Rose Law Firm records<\/a>), there are a few that might still be relevant. (Possibly the espionage statutes?) I think that Felonia is trying to stall things until she is safely dead and buried.<\/p>\n Lamberth even gave some examples of lingering questions about Clinton’s emails, such as how did she come to believe that her private emails would be preserved under normal State Department processes, who told her this and when, at what point did she learn department records management officials did not know about the server, “[a]nd why did she think that using a private server to conduct State Department business was permissible under the law in the first place?” <\/b><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n