![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/schadenboner.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Pervy Weinstein was convicted of several crimes, but walked away, (With his walker), on two of the most serious charges. However, the three he was convicted of have pretty much insured he will die in prison. Here are the details from ABC News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n Harvey Weinstein was sentenced<\/a> to 23 years on sex crime convictions in New York on Wednesday, following a landmark trial that spotlighted Hollywood power dynamics, predatory sexual violence and complex questions about the nature of consent and coercion. <\/b><\/p>\n That sentence includes 20 years for criminal sexual assault in the first degree, which stems from an accusation from former “Project Runway” production assistant Mimi Haley, and three years for rape in the third degree, which stems from an accusation from Jessica Mann, who is now being named by ABC News as she told the district attorney’s office after a verdict was reached she does not object to being named publicly.<\/b><\/p>\n A very brave woman indeed. However, considering what a dirt bag Pervy Weinstein is, I don\u2019t see any blowback heading towards here. Hopefully, the sentences will give her some closure.<\/p>\n The sentences are set to run consecutively. <\/b><\/p>\n Ouch! For those of you who might not understand what this means, in many cases, when a convict is given multiple sentences for crimes, they run concurrently. This means that if someone is sentenced to multiple terms in prison, they all run at the same time. When someone is sentenced to consecutive terms, it means that the convict has to complete the first sentence before the next one is counted. Basically, considering Pervy\u2019s age, this means he\u2019s been sentenced to life in prison.<\/p>\n Hours after the sentences were handed down, Weinstein was rushed from Rikers Island back to Manhattan’s Bellevue Hospital Center with chest pains, according to spokesman Juda Engelmayer. <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cHe had chest pains and Rikers staff decided for safety to send him back to Bellevue now. He will be evaluated and likely will stay overnight,” Engelmayer said. “We appreciate the care and concern of the Department of Corrections office and staff.” <\/b><\/p>\n It sounds like Pervy is finally understanding that his days of wine, rape and donations to Felonia von Pantsuit are over and done. The big worry now is that Weinstein might have information on Felonia and others he might trade for a lighter sentence, and being \u201cEpsteined\u201d for it.<\/p>\n Weinstein<\/a> was “despondent and dejected” as he prepared for sentencing after being convicted earlier this month of sexually assaulting the two women, according to his spokesman Juda Engelmayer. <\/b><\/p>\n Weinstein was facing a minimum of probation and a maximum of four years in prison on the rape conviction, and between five and 25 years on the criminal sexual assault conviction. <\/b><\/p>\n In a sentencing recommendation letter to the judge in the case, Manhattan prosecutors detailed 36 “prior bad acts” they said justified an extended prison sentence for Weinstein. <\/b><\/p>\n Oh nuts, I didn\u2019t know that the prosecutors did that. It makes it sound like he was being sentenced for crimes he wasn\u2019t even tried for, let alone convicted of. I\u2019m not a lawyer, but that sounds like something they can appeal on, at least to get the sentences seriously reduced.<\/p>\n Most people, and that includes me, believe that any sentencing should only deal with the charges brought and a conviction made on, and any statements made by the victims. To bring in things that may have happened, but were not heard in court, should be discarded by the judge, and a mild sanction brought against the prosecutor. I have no problem with the time the Perverted Convict is going to serve, I just don\u2019t want it to include things that weren\u2019t brought up in evidence in the case.<\/p>\n Prosecutors did not recommend a specific sentence in the letter, but contended that it was “totally appropriate” to show through the court’s sentence “that sexual assault, even if perpetrated upon an acquaintance or in a professional setting, is a serious offense worthy of a lengthy prison sentence.”<\/b><\/p>\n I have no problem with that part at all. It deals with the case at hand.<\/p>\n Defense attorneys were seeking a minimum sentence of five years.<\/strong><\/p>\n “As an individual with no criminal history having spent no time previously incarcerated, his health concerns, his age, and as famous as he is, a custodial sentence will no doubt prove much more difficult for Mr. Weinstein than most other inmates, which further counsels in favor of a sentence of five years’ imprisonment,” defense attorneys Damon Chernois and Donna Rotunno said in their own letter to the judge. <\/b><\/p>\n “With respect to deterrence, counsel will again note that Mr. Weinstein is a first-time offender.” <\/b><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n