{"id":30849,"date":"2020-05-13T06:14:21","date_gmt":"2020-05-13T10:14:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=30849"},"modified":"2020-05-13T06:14:21","modified_gmt":"2020-05-13T10:14:21","slug":"what-did-obama-know-and-when-did-he-know-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=30849","title":{"rendered":"What did Obama know and when did he know it?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. Last week brought a raft of very interesting information in the attempted coup against President Donald Trump. First, we have the end of the Dreyfus<\/i><\/span> Flynn Affair when General Michael Flynn walked out of court essentially a free man after the charges were dropped by the Department of Justice.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Next we had the release transcripts of the House Intelligence committee\u2019s fake investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. These transcripts were being vetted by the Director of National Intelligence to make sure no classified information was accidentally released.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

These transcripts should have been released some time ago, but Adam Schifthead was trying to block the full release. Finally, the DNI, Richard Grenell told Schifthead that everything was cleared and that if Shfthead didn\u2019t release the documents, he would. The transcripts were finally released and now we know why Schifthead was trying to block them. It proved beyond any doubt that he was lying through his teeth about everything.<\/p>\n

The transcripts, and the evidence that Flynn\u2019s attorney, Sydney Powers found, also showed a few other things, namely that the Obama Regime knew that there was no collusion. This is where things start to get really interesting. All these documents are now leading straight into the Oval Office. Here are some of the interesting details from The Federalist<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

Information released in the Justice Department\u2019s motion to dismiss the case it brought against Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn confirms the significance of a January 5, 2017, meeting at the Obama White House. It was at this meeting that Obama gave guidance to key officials who would be tasked with protecting his administration\u2019s utilization of secretly funded Clinton campaign research, which alleged Trump was involved in a treasonous plot to collude with Russia, from being discovered or stopped by the incoming administration. <\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\u201cPresident Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia,\u201d National Security Advisor Susan Rice wrote in an unusual email<\/a> to herself about the meeting that was also attended by Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, FBI Director James Comey, and Vice President Joe Biden. <\/b><\/p>\n

Now, isn\u2019t this interesting? We have Sally Yates, who refused to follow the instructions of President Trump and was fired for insubordination. James Comey, who is probably looking at an indictment in his future, and Groping Joe the rapist who thinks he should be the hair sniffer in chief.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

When Felonia von Pantsuit, who they had been protecting from her own stupidity, flamed out, crashed and burned in November, 2016, the Obama regime panicked. The plan had been to have Felonia provide continued cover of the Obama thugs and their criminal activities.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

She would have shredded everything that could have incriminated Obama and his minions in any number of criminal activities. (Unless, of course, it benefited her) Instead, she lost and Donald Trump was going to be the next President of the United States. Now they had to come up with something to either overturn the election or hamstring President Trump. Felonia\u2019s fake Russia Dossier fit the bill perfectly.<\/p>\n

A clearer picture is emerging of the drastic steps that were taken to accomplish Obama\u2019s goal in the following weeks and months. Shortly thereafter, high-level operatives began intensely leaking selective information supporting a supposed Russia-Trump conspiracy theory, the incoming National Security Advisor was ambushed, and the incoming Attorney General was forced to recuse himself from oversight of investigations of President Trump. At each major point in the operation, explosive media leaks were a key strategy in the operation to take down Trump. <\/b><\/p>\n

Did anyone ever tell these scum that 7 Days in May<\/b><\/a> was a novel, not an operations manual?<\/p>\n

Not only was information on Russia not fully shared with the incoming Trump team, as Obama directs, the leaks and ambushes made the transition chaotic, scared quality individuals away from working in the administration, made effective governance almost impossible, and materially damaged national security. When Comey was finally fired on May 9, in part for his duplicitousness regarding his handling of the Russia collusion theory, he orchestrated the launch of a Special Counsel probe that continued his efforts for another two years. That probe ended with Mueller finding no evidence of any American colluding with Russia to steal the 2016 election, much less Trump or anyone connected to him.<\/b><\/p>\n

And last week the charges against General Flynn were dropped. This was nothing less then a flat out coup attempt by the holdovers of the Obama regime, (It was a major mistake on President Trump\u2019s part not to fire every single one of them by January 25th<\/sup>, 2017), to overthrow the President of the United States.<\/p>\n

In ANY other country, this would be considered treason. The only reason these scum aren\u2019t going to be lined and shot is that the charge of Treason is the only crime written into the Constitution of the United States. It is intentionally hard to prove. However, there are any number of other charges that can and should be brought against these people, and I\u2019m at the point of saying that should include former Vice President Joe Biden and former President Barack Obama.<\/p>\n

There is a writer I converse with on occasion, (And who\u2019s books I HIGHLY<\/a> recommend), by the name of Tom Kratman<\/a>. He is a retired Army colonel, a reformed lawyer, (He forgot to renew his license and never looked back), and now is a fine novelist. We have discussed how to deal with a president who commits actual criminal acts while in office.<\/p>\n

Mr. Kratman is of the opinion that we should not put former president\u2019s on trial for their actions in office. His reasoning is that if a person thinks that he or she might be charged, they won\u2019t leave office. I\u2019ve disagreed with his belief. If a president were to refuse to leave, he or she would be removed, either legally or when someone blew his or her head off. We\u2019ve agreed to disagree and moved on to other things.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

However, if what we\u2019re now seeing indicates that President Obama told his people to do whatever it took to get rid of President Trump, then I\u2019m sorry, he needs to be charged. It will be interesting to see just where the John Durham investigation leads. From what is out there now, to laymen such as myself, there are a lot of former Obama minions, starting with James Comey and Andrew McCabe who need to go to prison. What will also be interesting to see is who will flip first and name Obama and Biden?<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Thatisall<\/p>\n\"1\"2\"3\"4\"5 (1<\/strong> votes, average: 5.00<\/strong> out of 5)
<\/span><\/span>Loading...<\/span>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n