{"id":31452,"date":"2020-08-14T06:16:27","date_gmt":"2020-08-14T10:16:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=31452"},"modified":"2020-08-14T06:16:27","modified_gmt":"2020-08-14T10:16:27","slug":"and-things-get-stranger-in-the-mccloskey-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=31452","title":{"rendered":"And things get stranger in the McCloskey Case"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. The case of the corrupt prosecutor, Kim Gardner and her innocent victims, the McCloskey\u2019s, continues to get even weirder. It now appears that the Circuit Attorney’s office, (What we call the District Attorney), flat out threatened the police if they didn\u2019t arrest the McCloskeys.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Recently, the Attorney General for the State of Missouri filed papers to have the case against the McCloskeys dismissed. As that works it\u2019s way through the system, more information has been coming out on how the Circuit Attorney\u2019s office actually works. A few weeks ago it was learned that the assistant C.A. had the pistol that Mrs. McCloskey was waving around didn\u2019t work. (Which the McCloskeys were fully aware of since they had disabled it)<\/p>\n

When the weapon was examined by a forensics technician and determined that it had been rendered nonfunctional, the Assistant City Attorney had the tech fix the gun and then declared it was fully operational. (This is called \u201cTampering with evidence\u201d and is a no no) Now it\u2019s coming out that Gardner\u2019s office threatened the police involved in the investigation, telling them to file charges or blaming the police for the delays. Here are the details from KDSK<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

The lead St. Louis police detective investigating the McCloskey case refused to sign at least two versions of court documents prosecutors drafted, according to a review of those documents obtained by 5 On Your Side. <\/b><\/p>\n

In addition, police contend at least one person in the crowd was armed and another was wearing a bullet-resistant vest, after analyzing videos taken June 28, when the couple confronted protesters with guns. <\/b><\/p>\n

The police originally saw this as a classic case of self defense under the Castle Doctrine and were looking at charging the \u201cProtesters\u201d who knocked down the gate and forced their way onto the property. This is why the police had no plans to charge the McCloskeys. However, Kim Gardner is well known for abusing her position and punishing her political rivals and anyone who she doesn\u2019t like.<\/p>\n

The documents obtained by 5 On Your Side include an email Gardner\u2019s Assistant Circuit Attorney Chris Hinckley sent to the lead investigator on the case, Sgt. Curtis Burgdorf. Hinckley emailed police the day before the McCloskeys were served with a search warrant, stating it needed to happen \u201cnow.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cAt this point, everything points to these weapons being real and loaded, but no one has asked or confirmed,\u201d he wrote. \u201cCome trial, they\u2019ll say they were waiving around a BB gun and an air rifle.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

It\u2019s becoming obvious that Gardner\u2019s office was going to ignore the State Constitution and the laws regarding self defense and the castle doctrine.<\/p>\n

Hinckley also wrote to Burgdorf\u2019s commander, Maj. Angela Coonce. <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cOur office is receiving inquiries from the public and press about a warrant application and potential charges. We\u2019ve thus far said the matter \u2018remains under investigation.\u2019 I\u2019d really like to avoid pointing to a police follow-up request as the hold-up, but I won\u2019t control the messaging if this goes on any longer. Please see what you can do to help this along. Again, I\u2019m asking for priority on the firearms issue.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

That sounds like a threat to me. Like all good CommuNazis, the first goal is to strip away anyone\u2019s means of defense, both from the mobs and from totalitarian thugs like Hinckley and Gardner.<\/p>\n

That was when the search warrant was issued and the rifle seized. The pistol was already in the hands of the McCloskey\u2019s attorney, and he turned it over to the police.<\/p>\n

Once the pistol was in the hands of the Circuit Attorney\u2019s office, they had it checked for functionality. It has been reported that the pistol was nonfunctional. If true, it would make the already spurious charges more impossible to prove.<\/p>\n

Hinckley ordered the crime lab to disassemble and reassemble Patricia McCloskey\u2019s gun and signed a court document stating that it was \u201ccapable of lethal use\u201d at the time she pointed it at protesters. <\/b><\/p>\n

In other words, tamper with the evidence and lie under oath.<\/p>\n

In a motion, Gardner wrote that the law allows prosecutors to say both of the McCloskeys guns were readily capable of lethal use, \u201ceven without proof that they were functional or loaded at the time of the incident.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

Actually, no it doesn\u2019t, not in the circumstances the McCloskeys faced. However, the armed thug waving around his gun during the commission of multiple crimes certainly does. Care to guess if the Corrupt Kim Gardner is prosecuting that person?<\/p>\n

The McCloskey\u2019s attorney, Joel Schwartz, said Patricia McCloskey\u2019s gun was not functional because it was once used as a prop in a trial. The McCloskeys are both attorneys. <\/b><\/p>\n

Which can easily be verified by court documents. The McCloskeys would have had to work with the court officers to insure the pistol was non functional and unloaded in case a criminal got his or her hands on it. You can bet the defense team already has that documentation along with the names of the officers involved in verifying the pistol couldn\u2019t be used.<\/p>\n

He said Gardner\u2019s interpretation of the law is wrong. <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s a loose interpretation of the statute and the law requires a weapon to be operable at the time of an offense,\u201d he said. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The lead detective finally signed the probable cause document to secure the warrant, however it had to go through two revisions before it was signed. The detective, Curtis Burgdorf, had some serious questions and concerns.<\/p>\n