![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/08\/The-Stupid.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
To explain what court packing is, you need to go back to the administration of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the Saint of all that is Fascist<\/i><\/span> Progressive to the Democrats. When FDR pushed through his \u201cNew Deal,\u201d which basically centralized all control of the economy in the hands of the progressives in Washington, people objected and sued.<\/p>\n The Supreme Court ruled against most of the New Deal which angered FDR and his followers. FDR came up with the idea of increasing the number of seats on the Supreme Court and \u201cPacking\u201d it with justices who would rule his way. The idea went down in flames.<\/p>\n Now that President Trump and the Republicans are about to secure a solid Constitutionalist majority on the court, the Democrats, who have started saying that they\u2019re going to \u201cPack the court\u201d with new justices who will ignore the constitution and rule in favor of whatever the Progressives want. This isn\u2019t playing well in the country. Now the Democrats are trying to turn it around by saying that President Trump is packing the court. Here are the details from Fox News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n Senate<\/a> Judiciary Committee member Sen. Chris Coons said on Sunday that the Senate moving to confirm President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett<\/a> “constitutes court-packing,” and called the nominee’s views “disqualifying.” <\/b><\/p>\n Coons, D-Del., made the comments during an interview with “Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace. <\/b><\/p>\n “I’m going to be laying out the ways in which Judge Barrett’s views … are not just extreme, they’re disqualifying,” Coons said of Democrats’ strategy for Barrett’s hearings. “It constitutes court-packing.” <\/b><\/p>\n Senator Ben Sasse took issue with Chris Coons idea that President Trump was packing the court.<\/p>\n “Claiming that court-packing is filling open vacancies that obviously isn’t what court-packing means,” Sasse said. He also called it “grotesque” that Joe Biden is refusing to answer the “really basic question” of whether or not he will support court-packing as president. Biden has been asked many times his stance on the issue and has refused to answer one way or another. Biden Friday was asked whether or not voters “deserve to know”<\/a> if he would pack the court, to which he responded, “[n]o they don’t.”<\/strong><\/p>\n Unfortunately, it looks like Coon\u2019s claim is now the new Democrat Talking Point. They are now saying that all the openings that President Trump filled, (And he has filled most of them), constitute packing the courts. In an article in the Washington Examiner<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n Sen. Dick Durbin, an Illinois Democrat and member of the Judiciary Committee, also misused the court packing term on NBC\u2019s <\/a><\/b>Meet the Press<\/b><\/i><\/a> on Sunday, saying, \u201cThe American people have watched Republicans packing the court over the last three and a half years, and they brag about it, that they\u2019ve taken every vacancy and filled it.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n Durbin the Turbin, (So called for his supporting every Islamic enemy of the United States), is partially correct…for once. President Trump and the Republican Senate have been filling all the open slots, and doing it with first rate jurists who follow the law and the actual Constitution. They don\u2019t go into it and \u201cFind\u201d things, usually to the detriment of the American People, that the judges put forward by Democrats usually do. The Obama Judges are notorious for ignoring the constitution and usurping authority the do not have.<\/p>\n The only reason that President Trump has been stripping away the Democrats super-legislature, (Which is how they see the courts), is because the Great Mistake, Barack Obama, wasn\u2019t just incompetent, he was flat out lazy. He couldn\u2019t be bothered to fill all the seats out there, and when it did come to \u201cPacking the courts,\u201d it was Obama and Dingy Harry Reid who did it.<\/p>\n Obama and Reid decided that they should add three new judges to the 4th<\/sup> Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington. This is the court that handles most of the regulatory cases that come up, where people and corporations sue trying to stop some regulatory agency from instituting some rule that in many cases is designed to strip away the rights of individuals and businesses. Obama and Reid wanted to make sure that their ideas were protected, so added three judges that really weren\u2019t needed. Now the 4th<\/sup> Circuit is being seen as the new bastion of \u201cThe Living Constitution,\u201d and is surpassing the 9th<\/sup> Circuit for bad rulings.<\/p>\n The original plan was, of course, to replace Justice Scalia, the Notoriously Dead Ruth Bader-Ginsburg and the other older justices with hard left wing Progressives who would ignore the Constitution. However, that plan failed spectacularly when the worst presidential candidate ever, Felonia von Pantsuit, lost the election. President Trump has replaced two Justices and with Judge Amy Barrett, is about to add another justice who is a strict constructionist, ending the plans of the progressives for probably a generation.<\/p>\n Democrats, including Coons, have criticized Republicans for rushing the nomination and warned that Barrett may vote to overturn the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in a case the Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in shortly after the presidential election. <\/b><\/p>\n “President Trump has said he would only nominate someone who would overturn the Affordable Care Act, taking away health care protections from 100 million Americans in the middle of a pandemic,” Coons said Sunday. “Both President Trump and members of the majority on this committee have said they would only vote for a nominee who will overturn Roe v. Wade.” <\/b><\/p>\n Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided in the technical sense. (Not getting into the debate here. I favor making abortion obsolete. Women won\u2019t need or want them. Problem thereby solved) Many people think the court should have left this to the states and kept the Federal government out of it. However, it\u2019s not all that likely any cases are coming up that will be \u201cKeep it or ban it!\u201d anytime soon.<\/p>\n The other one is that joke known as the (Un)Affordable (No)Care Act, better known as Obamacare. The only reason it\u2019s still on the books is due to that spineless Deep State Uniparty loser, Chief Justice John Roberts. He literally acted as a \u201cSuper-Legislator\u201d along with the Four Progressives on the bench and ruled Obamacare was constitutional since it was a tax. The problem was, that was not what the case was about. He literally made his own law instead of sending that mess back to Congress to be fixed. (Although it is unfixable)<\/p>\n Now there is another case coming up that, thanks to President Trump, makes Robert\u2019s ruling moot. Because of the way San Fran Nan \u201cWe have to pass it to know what\u2019s in it\u201d Pelosi wrote the bill, there is no mechanism to decouple any section that is declared unconstitutional. If one sections goes down, the entire pile of horse manure dies.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n