{"id":32685,"date":"2020-11-12T08:14:51","date_gmt":"2020-11-12T13:14:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=32685"},"modified":"2020-11-12T08:14:51","modified_gmt":"2020-11-12T13:14:51","slug":"the-great-panicdemic-of-2020-courts-rule-against-gavin-newsom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=32685","title":{"rendered":"The Great Panicdemic of 2020: Courts rule against Gavin Newsom"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. With the Democrats moving to destroy any trust in the election process, we still have some judges that believe in the Constitution and the rights of the people. Recently, a judge ruled that Kalifornistan Fuhrer, Gavin Newsom\u2019s actions during the Great Panicdemic of 2020, were flat out unconstitutional.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Gavin Newsom basically assumed dictatorial powers when the Panicdemic hit. He pretty much trashed what was left of the state economy, and has been taking authority that he isn\u2019t entitled to. In other words, he\u2019s your typical Democrat politician. In love with himself and suffering from extreme delusions of competence. Finally, some people had enough and went to court. On November 2nd<\/sup>, Fuherer Newsom was basically dethroned. Here are the details from RedState<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-PrivateJet) was Whitmered in spectacular fashion by a Sutter County Superior Court Judge in a just-released ruling; an Executive Order Newsom issued June 3 that amended sections of the state\u2019s Elections Code was declared unconstitutional and a permanent injunction has been issued, barring Newsom from issuing additional Executive Orders that amend, change, alter, or create new statutory law or legislative policy. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

As we previously reported, Newsom was sued by two Republican Assemblymembers<\/a>, Kevin Kiley and James Gallagher over his one-man rule. A trial was held October 21, and Judge Sarah H. Heckman issued her tentative decision today. <\/b>Asm. Kiley tweeted out the good news: <\/b><\/p>\n

The Judge has ruled in our case against Gavin Newsom. We won. The Judge found good cause to issue a permanent injunction restraining the Governor from issuing further unconstitutional orders. <\/b><\/p>\n

Apparently, Newsom\u2019s lawyers tried to get the case dismissed as being moot. The judge disagreed.<\/p>\n

In the 9-page ruling<\/a>, the Court found that the cause was not moot, as Newsom\u2019s attorneys had argued; that the California Emergency Services Act (CESA) is not unconstitutional, in part because it does not \u201cdelegate to the Governor the power to legislate\u201d; that Newsom\u2019s Executive Order N-67-20 regarding the November 2020 general election was not authorized by CESA because it amended sections of the Elections Code; and that Plaintiffs are entitled to both declaratory and injunctive relief. <\/b><\/p>\n

Regarding the CESA, the Court had this to say: <\/b><\/p>\n

The plain meaning of the CESA does not delegate to the Governor the power to legislate, and therefore does not violate the separation of powers under Califomia Constitution Article Three, Section 3. Article Three of the CESA (Gov\u2019t Code $8565 -8574) enumerates the powers of the Governor during a declared state of emergency. <\/b><\/p>\n

I hate legalese. I speak two languages. American and Bad English.<\/p>\n

The ruling continues: <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cThe Governor does not have the power or authority to assume the Legislature\u2019s role of creating legislative policy and enactments. Because Executive Order N-67-20 amended sections of the Elections Code it exceeds the Governor\u2019s authority under CESA and renders Executive Order N-67-20 invalid.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n

I\u2019ve been looking at the Executive order, and again, I don\u2019t speak legalese. From what I have been able to determine, the problem arose in that Newsom decided to limit the number of places a person could go to vote in person, and ordered that ballots be mailed out. I can see one major issue. Kalifornistan\u2019s voter rolls are a joke.<\/p>\n

Because of their Motor Voter registration laws, many foreign nationals are put on the voter rolls. This doesn\u2019t mean that they will vote, and in many cases, it\u2019s been determined that they didn\u2019t know they had been put on the rolls. Basically, the Kalifornistan election system makes your typical Turd World system look honest and competently run.<\/p>\n

Gallagher and Kiley issued a statement saying: <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cThis is a victory for separation of powers. The Governor has continued to create and change state law without public input and without the deliberative process provided by the Legislature. Today the judicial branch again gave him the check that was needed and that the Constitution requires.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cNobody disputes that there are actions that should be taken to keep people safe during an emergency. But that doesn\u2019t mean that we put our Constitution and free society on hold by centralizing all power in the hands of one man.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n

I wonder, has anyone bothered to tell Der Fuherer, Gavin Newsom, that he isn\u2019t supposed to pull an Obama and rule by Decree? Frankly, it doesn\u2019t matter. Kalifornistan is pretty much a failed state. Bankrupt, run by incompetent, corrupt scum and for all intents and purposes, a single party state. Is it surprising that Newsom thinks that he can do pretty much whatever he wants? As to whether or not he will just ignore the ruling, who can say? I woudn\u2019t put it past him.<\/p>\n

Thatisall<\/p>\n\"1\"2\"3\"4\"5 (1<\/strong> votes, average: 5.00<\/strong> out of 5)
<\/span><\/span>Loading...<\/span>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n

\u00a0