![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/07\/The-Good-Idea-Fairy-3.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Of course, we all know that the masks just don\u2019t do what the totalitarian elites like to claim they do, which is stop 100% of the China Virus 100% of the time. The real reason they want it is to move America one step closer to their goal of restoring the slave state they lost in 1865. Now we have two of the most Fascist minded members of the Senate trying to pass a law mandating masks. Here are the details from Just The News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) want to see a “mask-wearing mandate” as part of the next coronavirus relief package that Congress passes. <\/b><\/p>\n “Our goal is going to be, you know, to work towards including it inside of the coronavirus relief package,” Markey said during a news conference on Friday about the Encouraging Masks for All Act. “We think this is kind of common sense.” <\/b><\/p>\n Markey has about as much common sense as a brain dead cockroach, and about the same level of intelligence.<\/p>\n “Making this mask-wearing mandate a part of that pandemic relief is an imperative; it’s a moral imperative,” Blumenthal said at the news conference. <\/b><\/p>\n “And frankly, a political imperative,” he added, “because the solution to this pandemic requires a comprehensive strategy, including mask-wearing, physical distancing, hand-washing, even as we move into a stage in addressing the pandemic that will enable more and more people to have vaccine. But this pandemic relief package is a good down payment. It’s a next step, and the mask-wearing mandate should be a part of it.” <\/b><\/p>\n Blumenthal is a classic station totalitarian. He has never met a bill that stripped rights away from the people he wasn\u2019t all in with.<\/p>\n The bill,<\/a> which requires mask-wearing on federal property, includes an additional $5 billion for the Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund that would be made available to the states that “implement masking requirements.” <\/b>It also includes $75 million for “grants to states for promotion of universal mask wearing.” <\/b><\/p>\n Of course, Americans in general don\u2019t like being told what to do by the government, and many people refuse to wear masks, and many more only wear them because their choice has been stripped from them.<\/p>\n The senators were asked for their response to Americans who argue that it’s their constitutional right not to wear a mask. They trotted out some union flunky to make their case for them.<\/p>\n “We do certain things with public safety, and people agree to do those things in order to participate in our society,” said Sara Nelson, international president of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, AFL-CIO. <\/b><\/p>\n “So we have rules of the road for driving, for example, and people have to follow those requirements, including wearing a seatbelt, including not talking on your cell phone while you’re driving,” she said. <\/b><\/p>\n Of course they would bring in some union hack for cover. Never mind that most people don\u2019t care for unions. As to wearing a seat belt? That is common sense and frankly doesn\u2019t need to be mandated. Simple education will be sufficient, and for those who won\u2019t learn? Stupidity can be a fatal disease. As for banning talking on a cellphone while driving? That has already failed. (I prefer my bluetooth system anyway) Of course, Comrade Totalitarian Blumenthal is in total agreement with the Union Floozy.<\/p>\n Blumenthal agreed with Nelson’s assessment on public safety and constitutional rights related to the pandemic. <\/b><\/p>\n “In light of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling<\/a> on the constitutional freedom to attend church services, I think that ruling was in error with all due respect,” he said. <\/b><\/p>\n “But the attending of worship or religious services, where there is a constitutional right to practice religion, is completely different from a public safety measure that applies to public transportation or public facilities, federal premises,” he added. “There is no constitutional right to defy a public safety order in the midst of a pandemic. Zero constitutional right.” <\/b><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n