![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/something-smells-fishy-and-it-certainly-isnt-fish.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Fauci and the former NIH, (National Institute of Health), have denied all allegations regarding the alleged \u201cGain of Function\u201d research that was purported to have occurred, and had been paid for by American tax payers. Now the NIH is changing their story and admitting that yes, we did pay for this. Here are the details from Just The News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n Key scientist says admission shows that top administrators, including former NIH Director Francis Collins and NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, “lied to Congress, lied to the press, and lied to the public” in denying NIH funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan. <\/b><\/p>\n T<\/b>wo weeks after National Institutes of Health director Francis Collins announced his retirement<\/a>, his agency has complicated congressional testimony by Collins and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases\u00a0Director Anthony Fauci about alleged gain-of-function virus research sponsored by the U.S. <\/b><\/p>\n Both officials have denied approving grants for such research through the EcoHealth Alliance and Wuhan Institute of Virology, but a letter Wednesday from NIH Principal Deputy Director Lawrence Tabak to House Oversight Committee ranking Republican James Comer describes an unforeseen experimental result that calls the denials into question. <\/b><\/p>\n The letter shows that “NIH \u2014 and specifically, Collins, Fauci, and Tabak \u2014 lied to Congress, lied to the press, and lied to the public,” Richard Ebright, lab director at Rutgers University’s Waskman Institute of Microbiology, tweeted Wednesday night when sharing the letter<\/a>. “Knowingly. Willfully. Brazenly.”<\/b><\/p>\n If this is true, nothing will be done. The Followers of Faucism in the Church of Fauci, (Almost exclusively Progressive Liberal Democratic Communazis these days), will make sure that this is buried in the deepest hole they can dig.<\/p>\n The final progress report submitted by EcoHealth in August described a “limited experiment” in which a modified bat coronavirus made mice “sicker” than than original virus, Tabak told Comer. “As sometimes occurs in science, this was an unexpected result of the research, as opposed to something that the researchers set out to do.”<\/b><\/p>\n And if you believe that, I have a nice bridge I want to sell you and Epstein did kill himself.<\/p>\n NIH determined the proposed research didn’t meet the standard for “enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential” because it wasn’t shown these bat coronaviruses could infect humans. But “out of an abundance of caution” it required EcoHealth to “immediately” report “a one log increase in growth” if it happened, which would trigger a secondary review of the research by NIH. <\/b>EcoHealth didn’t do that, Tabak wrote, and it now has five days to turn over “any and all unpublished data” from the research to NIH.<\/b><\/p>\n The letter repeatedly states that the virus that was studied and enhanced wasn\u2019t the Wuhan Flu. It states that the virus that was modified is different from the China virus. However, I have a recollection, (Sorry, I don\u2019t have any citations handy), that researchers who were studying the Wuhan Flu once it got out into the wild did see indications of genetic engineering.<\/p>\n NIH put out a statement<\/a> Wednesday on “misinformation” about COVID-19 origins that emphasizes “the virus is likely the result of viral evolution in nature” and not developed as a “biological weapon.” It does not mention EcoHealth’s violation of grant terms or the creation of a virus that made mice sicker. <\/b><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n