{"id":35920,"date":"2021-11-15T18:52:10","date_gmt":"2021-11-15T23:52:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=35920"},"modified":"2021-11-15T18:52:10","modified_gmt":"2021-11-15T23:52:10","slug":"the-durham-investigation-appears-to-be-closing-in-on-felonia-von-pantsuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=35920","title":{"rendered":"The Durham investigation appears to be closing in on Felonia von Pantsuit"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. A little while ago, Special Council John Durham indicted campaign lawyer for Felonia von Pantsuit for lying to the FBI. Now even more interesting tidbits of information are coming out regarding the Fake dossier used to try and \u201cGet Trump!\u201d<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

In this case, the previously unknown von Pantsuit foreign policy advisor has been identified, and he is currently one of the string pullers of the meat puppet, President Bumbles P. Dementia. Here are the details from Fox News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

Jake Sullivan, President Biden’s White House national security adviser, is the “foreign policy advisor” referred to in the indictment of former Hillary Clinton presidential campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann, according to two well-placed sources. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

This is the closest Special Counsel John Durham’s investigation<\/a> into the origins of the Russia investigation has come to anyone directly associated with the Biden White House.<\/b><\/p>\n

Considering what he did, I wonder how long before he\u2019s hauled away in handcuffs?<\/b><\/p>\n

Sussmann was indicted for allegedly lying to the FBI on Sept. 16, and has pleaded not guilty to one count of making a false statement to a federal agent. This case came out of Durham\u2019s probe into the origins of the Russia investigation. <\/b><\/p>\n

One of the problems with this \u201cLying to federal agents\u201d deal is that they can lie to you about everything, and they do. They also don\u2019t record any interviews. They take notes and then write up what they recall. This was the game they used to charge General Flynn. I\u2019m fully on board with all meetings between citizens, even corrupt Democrats, and the FBI. It helps keep things honest and above board. Every other law enforcement agency records their interviews, but not the FBI.<\/p>\n

Durham\u2019s indictment alleges Sussmann told then-FBI General Counsel James Baker he was not doing work “for any client” when he requested and held a September 2016 meeting in which he provided evidence of a purported secret communications channel between then-candidate Donald Trump and Russia.\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n

In fact, he later billed the Clinton campaign for the meeting, according to Durham’s indictment<\/a>. The FBI also looked into the story about the alleged link between the Trump presidential campaign and the Russian bank, it turned out to be bogus. <\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

This didn\u2019t stop people like Adam Schifthead from claiming that it was true and that President Trump was a paid agent for the Russians.<\/p>\n

The Durham indictment lays out a scenario where an unnamed Clinton campaign lawyer, “exchanged emails with the Clinton Campaign\u2019s campaign manager, communications director, and foreign policy advisor [Jake Sullivan] concerning the Russian Bank-1 allegations that Sussmann had recently shared,” with an unnamed reporter. <\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

This sounds like a conspiracy to me, but I\u2019m not a lawyer nor am I versed in the legal minutia required to prove such a case.<\/p>\n

There is no indication that Sullivan is a target of Durham\u2019s investigation, only that he received information from a campaign lawyer. <\/b><\/p>\n

And there shouldn\u2019t be. After all, you don\u2019t want to tip him off and give him time to borrow Felonia von Pantsuit\u2019s Bleach Bit tool. Make it look like he\u2019s completely safe, then drop the hammer on him.<\/p>\n

The Durham indictment also alleges that Sussmann was working on behalf of a tech industry executive, an American internet company and Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.<\/b><\/p>\n

Ok, my question here is, were the other two part of the conspiracy or just regular clients? If the former, pick them up and throw them in jail. If the latter, then they shouldn\u2019t have been brought up at all.<\/p>\n

Another grand jury indictment was returned on Nov. 4 for Igor Danchenko, a Russian analyst who is accused of being the primary sub-source in the Steele dossier. He is charged with five counts of making false statements to the FBI and his next court appearance is scheduled for Wednesday. <\/b><\/p>\n

It looks like Durham is going for the low hanging fruit. I wonder if he\u2019s going to try and flip these two and use them to get others, including Felonia von Pantsuit and Jake Sullivan? It will be interesting to see how the \u201cUsual Suspects\u201d in the media and the Communazi party try to play down the fact that one of the conspirators is in a high level position in the Biden maladministration. It\u2019s also going to be interesting to see if Durham goes after Sullivan.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Thatisall<\/p>\n\"1\"2\"3\"4\"5 (1<\/strong> votes, average: 5.00<\/strong> out of 5)
<\/span><\/span>Loading...<\/span>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n

\u00a0