{"id":36140,"date":"2021-12-18T09:14:16","date_gmt":"2021-12-18T14:14:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=36140"},"modified":"2024-03-16T13:11:26","modified_gmt":"2024-03-16T17:11:26","slug":"new-biden-u-s-attorney-no-fan-of-1st-amendment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=36140","title":{"rendered":"New Biden U.S. Attorney no fan of 1st Amendment"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. Sadly, the morons, moonbats and RINO\u2019s in the Senate haven\u2019t been really paying attention to the nominees put forward by the Maladministration of President Bumbles Dementia. The latest one attacked reporters who were trying to interview her outside of her house.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

It isn\u2019t uncommon for journalists and other propagandists to \u201cAmbush\u201d a person outside their home. There are any number of reasons why, however it\u2019s usually to get any quotes or information first so they can \u201cScoop\u201d the opposition. Such tactics generally aren\u2019t welcomed by the subjects, however most will simply say, \u201cCall my office\u201d and walk away. Not the new U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts. She want on a tirade last year when cornered outside her house. Here are the details from Fox News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

A video of new Suffolk County District Attorney Rachael Rollins rebuking reporters for attempting to interview her outside of work resurfaced Wednesday after she was confirmed to be President Biden’s U.S. attorney for Massachusetts<\/a>.<\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

In the video from January 2021, Rollins accused journalists of risking the lives of her children after a reporter requested an interview near her home, video shows. The film crew, who work for Fox-affiliate Boston 25 News, asked Rollins if she would be willing to answer questions. Rollins, who became visibly upset, demanded to know how the reporters knew where she lived, to which they informed her it is a matter of public record. <\/b><\/p>\n

“So as a Black woman, in this moment in this country, you’re going to put my f—ing house on screen?” Rollins asked the reporter. At no point in the video is Rollins’ house shown. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Paranoid much? Granted, prosecutors don\u2019t make friends of criminals, however it is incredibly rare for one to be physically attacked. Frankly, if someone is going to go after a persecutor<\/i><\/span> prosecutor, they aren\u2019t going to be watching the news to find out their home address. A doer of evil who has decided to do evil is going to simply follow their target home while planning their evil cunning plans to do evil.<\/p>\n

“No, no, no, ma’am, we’re just here approaching you to ask you a question,” the reporter replied, according to the video.<\/a> <\/b><\/p>\n

“Get away from my family. Speak to me at my job. If I get hurt or harmed because of this, you are on the record for that, or my kids are f—ing killed,” Rollins told the journalists in the parking lot near her house. “Who do you think you are? This is private property. Get out of here!” <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Normally, journalists and cameramen stay off private property. They don\u2019t need the hassle of dealing with potential trespassing charges. This harpy went right off the deep end, probably due to not being in control of the situation. (Which is the point of these ambush interviews. The journalist\/reporter wants to catch their quarry off guard) The problem with all this is that it appears this video was not shown to the Senate prior to her confirmation.<\/p>\n

On Wednesday, Vice President Kamala Harris cast a pair of votes <\/a>helping the Senate confirm Rollins to be a new U.S. attorney in <\/b>Massachusetts.<\/b><\/u><\/a> <\/b><\/p>\n

I have little doubt that the maladministration knew about this nitwits tirade, however I have a feeling that the video was not made available to the committee investigating Rollins, and certainly not to the rank and file senate. Of course, since she is a member of the Communazi party, she could be setting fire to children and would still get a pass, as long as she was claiming she was aborting them, or that they were future Republicans or something.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Rollins threatened to call the police on the Boston 25 News team, saying, “And you know what I’ll do? I’ll call the police and make an allegation. And we’ll see how that works with you.” <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Right there, that would have been a disqualifying comment. She was perfectly willing to abuse her authority to go after people who dared to show up and ask her questions. Not content to be just plain stupid, she doubled down on stupid.<\/p>\n

Rollins went on to comment on the race of the female reporter before threatening to look up her identity. <\/b><\/p>\n

“So the rantings of a White woman get you here and scare my children?” Rollins asked. “Get off our private property, and I swear to God, I’m dead serious. I will find your name.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

I suspect the reporter\/journalist announced her name and affiliation when she showed up and started asking questions. Since Rollins was in a blind rage over someone daring to ask her a question, she forgot it.<\/p>\n

When the White House announced that Biden was nominating Rollins for the U.S. attorney position in Massachusetts back in July, several members of Congress praised the nomination on Twitter, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and “Squad” member Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass.\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n

“Suffolk County @DARollins is a national leader on transforming the criminal justice system and fighting the root causes of injustice,” Warren tweeted<\/a>. “She is a great choice for US Attorney \u2013 @SenMarkey and I were proud to recommend her to the Biden administration.” <\/b><\/p>\n

So we have the \u201cUsual suspects\u201d who were promoting this person. That should send up flares warning that she might not be someone who will hold the law and the Constitution in high regard. Considering her threats against the journalist, I don\u2019t think protecting people\u2019s rights are high on her list of priorities.<\/p>\n

Another reason to be concerned is who else thinks she is going to be just perfect. These are the hard left Soros District Attorneys who have been wrecking havoc on America.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Rollins also received some praise from far-left district attorneys who were backed by liberal billionaire George Soros. San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin called<\/a> Rollins a “GREAT choice!” and Arlington County Commonwealth’s Attorney Parisa Dehghani-Tafti said<\/a> Rollins is a “brilliant lawyer and a wonderful person.”<\/b><\/p>\n

This is probably why she didn\u2019t receive any votes from the Republicans in the senate, including the TransRepublicans such as Romney, Collins and that useless git, Graham.<\/p>\n

“Democrats have defunded police departments, stopped prosecutions for numerous crimes, ended cash bail, and demanded early release even for violent criminals,” Sen. Tom Cotton<\/a>, R-Ark., who serves on the\u00a0Senate Judiciary Committee,\u00a0said in July. “These actions resulted in a historic increase in murders and contributed to the crime wave. Rachael\u00a0Rollins won’t stand up for the victims of these crimes, and I will seek to stop her nomination.” <\/b><\/p>\n

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has also criticized her saying she was “soft on crime advocacy” and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, called her a “lawless so-called prosecutor.” <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

it seems that like all the other hard left Soros DA\u2019s. She won\u2019t enforce any laws she doesn\u2019t like or prosecute people she thinks are \u201cSpecial.\u201d That worked out real well for Kim Foxx, who tried to protect the convicted criminal, Jussie Smollett.<\/p>\n

Cotton\u2019s statement was spurred by a\u00a0<\/b>policy memo<\/b><\/u>\u00a0<\/b><\/a>Rollins released shortly after taking office in January 2019 which identified more than a dozen\u00a0<\/b>charges<\/b><\/u><\/a>\u00a0she said should be declined for prosecution<\/a> entirely or recommended for diversion, such as mental health or substance abuse treatment. <\/b><\/p>\n

On her campaign website for Suffolk County district attorney, she included several crimes that she wouldn’t prosecute, including trespassing, drug possession, disorderly conduct, shoplifting, and breaking and entering.\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n

And, of course, if someone were to stop one a criminal who was committing one of these crimes, she would prosecute them instead. Frankly, Rollins is just going to be yet another politically motivated thug with the willingness to abuse her authority. She and the other Soros prosecutors are working to destroy the United States. What she and the other Leftists fail to understand is that their ideas will cause people to look into going the vigilante route.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

One of the reasons we have a judicial system is to prevent the need for people to \u201cTake the law into their own hands.\u201d The problem we have today is that the Department of Justice, the Federal law enforcement system and a fair number of local and state systems have moved from enforcing the laws and protecting the innocent into going after the political enemies of the Progressive Liberal Democratic Communazis. Thanks to this attitude, people have lost all trust in the FBI, and this is moving down to the local levels.<\/p>\n

The only way to correct this, without going to full civil war route, (Which would be bad), is a flat out house cleaning of the entire federal judicial system, top to bottom. People like Rachael Rollins need to be shown the door sooner rather than later before they do something that sets a match to a fuse that can\u2019t be extinguished. The 2022 midterms and the 2024 election, if they actual happen and are honest, will allow America to put people into office who will give Washington D.C. the enema it so desperately needs.<\/p>\n