![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/11\/Reagan_toasting.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
After Bush was defeated by Slick Willy Clinton, his pack of merry morons declared that the size of the force was to big and we needed to reduce it and gain the \u201cPeace Dividend.\u201d It\u2019s generally accepted that what Clinton and the Democrats did went to far and gutted the military. When George W. Bush was elected, one of his plans was to restore the military to usability. That plan went up in smoke, along with the World Trade Center on 9\/11.<\/p>\n
With the exception of the invasion of Iraq, (Which was yet another Globalist boondoggle and, as it turned out, unnecessary), the military went from a combined arms force ready to take on the Russians, Chinese, North Koreans, etc. to a counterinsurgency force. One of the things President Trump was trying to do was rebuild the military to an all aspect force. With the installation of Bumbles Dementia, instead of rebuilding, we\u2019re beginning to see a flat our purge of \u201cUnreliable\u201d personnel. The current Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin has decreed that everything we look for in a man or woman is to be considered \u201cExtremist.\u201d Here are the details from the Daily Wire<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n S<\/b>ecretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently released a \u201cReport on Countering Extremist Activity Within the Department of Defense<\/a>,\u201d an outgrowth of Austin\u2019s January 2021 call for a worldwide \u201cstand down\u201d on extremism in the military.<\/b><\/p>\n Would you care to see what Austin considers \u201cExtremism?\u201d Here is a hint. The bozo who wrote this \u201creport\u201d is a firm believer in the racist indoctrination program known as \u201cCritical Race Theory.<\/p>\n Critical race theory (CRT) advocate Bishop Garrison, Austin\u2019s senior advisor for human capital, diversity, equity, and inclusion, heads the Countering Extremist Activity Working Group (CEAWG), which produced the 21-page report. Garrison\u2019s panel included several representatives of the leftist American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), but conservative attorney Michael Berry, general counsel of the First Liberty Institute, was summarily removed.<\/b><\/p>\n If this had been an actual balanced report looking at potential issues, then you would have seen a broad spectrum of political outlooks. Instead, they booted anyone who might ask unwanted questions off the panel. This doesn\u2019t bode well for the average military man or woman.<\/p>\n The resulting CEAWG report recommended updates to a Defense Department Instruction (DoDI 1325.6<\/a>), which defines and prohibits \u201cactive participation\u201d in \u201cextremist activities.\u201d \u00a0These include, \u201cAdvocating, engaging in or supporting terrorism\u201d [or] the \u201coverthrow of the government of the United States.\u201d\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n That makes sense of course. However, that isn\u2019t what Austin and his Communazi minions have in mind.<\/p>\n The Pentagon also forbids, \u201cAdvocating or engaging in unlawful force or violence to achieve goals that are political, religious, discriminatory, or ideological in nature.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Again, nothing controversial here. The word here is \u201cUnlawful.\u201d If the Congress determines that a country, group or religion is a direct threat to the United States, they issue a declaration and the military deals with them, usually, as long as they aren\u2019t being hamstrung, very permanently. The problem that is going to rear it\u2019s ugly head is this addition.<\/p>\n New regulations add, \u201cMilitary personnel are responsible for the content published on all personal and public Internet domains, including social media sites, blogs, websites, and applications.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n The devil here is not in the details; it will be in interpretations.\u00a0Would a soldier\u2019s \u201clike\u201d on a post \u201cJoe Biden is not the president,\u201d for example, be punishable as extremist behavior? <\/b><\/p>\n In the minds of the thugs, progressives and tyrants, that would be a hard yes. In it\u2019s most basic form, it\u2019s going to outlaw a soldier\u2019s absolute right to \u201cgripe.\u201d While there is some truth to surrendering some of your rights when you take the oath, what this looks like is flat out suppression of free speech.<\/p>\n Fox News reporter Jennifer Griffin asked that question at a Pentagon briefing.\u00a0Spokesman John Kirby dodged the \u201chypothetical,\u201d but referred to updated rules against <\/b>\u201c<\/b><\/em>posting, liking, sharing, re-tweeting, or otherwise distributing content [including emojis] when such action is taken with the intent to promote or otherwise endorse extremist activities.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n And who defines what is \u201cExtremist?\u201d<\/p>\n With the politicized, woke culture taking hold in the Pentagon, actions reflecting independent thought could jeopardize careers. Advocates of voter identification measures, for example, have been accused<\/a> of \u201cthreatening democracy\u201d and \u201cpromoting election sabotage.\u201d\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n So, who are the extremists here? Here\u2019s a hint.<\/p>\n Former FBI assistant director Andrew McCabe has put conservatives in the same category<\/a> as Islamic terrorists, and some partisans see military \u201cextremism\u201d everywhere. In a Washington Post op-ed<\/a>, three retired general officers hyperventilated about their fears of another attack on the U.S. Capitol, writing, \u201cWe are chilled to our bones about a coup succeeding next time . . . a military breakdown could lead to civil war.\u201d\u00a0In a still available 2019 tweet, Garrison himself accused<\/a> Trump supporters of \u201cnormalizing\u201d the actions of \u201cextremists,\u201d and \u201cracists.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n McCabe belongs in prison<\/a>. He was a key conspirator in the attempted coup against President Trump. Those three generals should be recalled and charged with sedition. (Flag officers are subject to recall unless physically incapable of serving as I understand it) All four of these people are in violation of the oaths they swore to uphold the Constitution of the United States.<\/p>\n Under the new rules, local commanders will be responsible for reviewing individual cases and punishing anyone \u201cAdvocating widespread unlawful discrimination based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex (including pregnancy), gender identity, or sexual orientation.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n So, if someone is a normal American in Uniform, and just happens to say something that goes against the \u201cCommandments of the Woke,\u201d they could be court martialed, imprisoned and dishonorably discharged? Oh that is going to go over real well out in Flyover country.<\/p>\n Definitions of unacceptable activities are extremely broad and could\u00a0apply to situations that would otherwise be protected by the First Amendment. As with COVID vaccination mandates, accommodations for religious liberty are unlikely.<\/b><\/p>\n And that will probably end up in front of the Supreme Court. As I mentioned before, when you put on the uniform you do give up some rights, however, Freedom of Speech is not one of them. Yes, you can be charged for disrespecting an officer, but holding an opinion that a large number of people also hold is something the USSC will move to protect.<\/p>\n So, if a female Naval Academy midshipman opposes biological males in her own or other women\u2019s swim teams<\/a>, is she advocating \u201cunlawful discrimination\u201d based on gender identity?\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n That would be a Yes.<\/p>\n The Supreme Court\u2019s 2020 <\/b>Bostock v. Clayton County<\/b><\/em> ruling expanding transgender employment rights did not apply to the military<\/a>, but some will argue that it did.\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n I can\u2019t speak to that case for any number of reasons, two of which are, I\u2019m not a lawyer and I know absolutely nothing about it. The military is covered by the Uniform Code of Military Justice, not the civilian legal code. However, the USSC can and does rule on military cases, and if the Woke totalitarians in the Pentagon try to use it, it will end up in front of the Court.<\/p>\n Extremism of any kind is unacceptable, but Austin\u2019s obsession with radicalism in the ranks has not been proportionate or even-handed. Out of two million military members, the CEAWG report admits that incidents are \u201crare . . . fewer than 100 over the past year.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n The man is flipping nuts for starters. When he travels overseas this clown basically climbs into a hazmat suit to \u201cProtect himself from the deadly Wuhan Flu.\u201d I also question his competence. If I recall correctly, he needed an exemption to become Secretary of Defense due to his being recently retired from the service. Frankly, his performance tells me it should not have been granted.<\/p>\n Griffin asked Kirby for a breakdown: \u201cWhat portion if any, [were] members of the sort of groups that you might consider white supremacist groups or were there also some who may have been present at a Black Lives Matter protest?\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n Kirby said he had no specifics, a peculiar response since the Defense Department tracks everything from bullets to battleships. <\/b><\/p>\n Four research contractors are working on DOD anti-extremist projects, but training materials concentrate on extremists on the far right of the political spectrum, not the far left.<\/strong><\/p>\n There is a very simple explanation for this. Those contractors were hired because they are anti-American hard left socialists.<\/p>\n Kevin Roberts of the Washington Examiner cited ACLED<\/a> in reporting<\/a>, \u201cof 1,101 violent incidents across 97 days, 933 of them directly involved Black Lives Matter. That\u2019s 84.7% of the civic violence in America across summer 2020.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n For the Woke, the BCLOM, (Black Communist Lives Only Matter), were just peaceful protesters peacefully looting, burning and murdering across America. They weren\u2019t the real threat. Those were people who had jobs, owned businesses, where white and support President Trump and didn’t take the law into their own hands and mow them down.<\/p>\n You would never suspect such a disproportionate ratio looking at last year\u2019s \u201cstanddown\u201d discussion guides, which included four examples of \u201cproblematic behaviors\u201d \u2013 all of them referencing neo-Nazi and white supremacy groups. <\/b><\/p>\n Another group they Woke Generals and Civilian administrators won\u2019t look at are what we call \u201cRIF\u2019s.\u201d Now RIF used to mean \u201cReduction In Force\u201d and was used when they Progressives had control of the government and decided it was a good time to gut the military. It\u2019s now used to refer to \u201cRadical Islamic Fundamentalists.\u201d There have been a number of incidents, the worst being the Fort Hood massacre.<\/p>\n Officials at Walter Reed Medical Center, where Army Maj. Nidal Hasan had been a resident, knew that the failing psychiatrist was espousing jihadist threats. \u201cFlashing red light\u201d warning signs<\/a>, including a lengthy slide presentation that defended suicide bombers and fratricide, clearly indicated<\/a> that Hasan was a \u201cticking time bomb.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n And what did these people do to either pull Hasan back from the edge or put him someplace where he couldn\u2019t do any harm, like Gitmo? They decided to make him \u201cSomeone else’s Problem.\u201d<\/p>\n According to an NPR report<\/a>, however, colleagues \u201cworried they might be \u2018discriminating\u2019 against Hasan because of his seemingly extremist Islamic beliefs.\u201d\u00a0The self-described \u201cSoldier for Allah\u201d<\/a> was transferred to Fort Hood, where he murdered 13 adults and one unborn baby.<\/b><\/p>\n That fiasco was able to happen for several reasons. One of the biggest was the fact that the soldiers were not armed. Their own commanders refused to let them carry on base, either their issue weapons or personal firearms.<\/p>\n Presaging today\u2019s \u201cwoke\u201d military, Army Chief of Staff General George Casey said<\/a>, \u201cOur diversity, not only in our Army, but in our country, is a strength.\u00a0And as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that\u2019s worse.\u201d\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n