{"id":36916,"date":"2022-04-07T14:13:56","date_gmt":"2022-04-07T18:13:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=36916"},"modified":"2022-04-07T14:13:56","modified_gmt":"2022-04-07T18:13:56","slug":"need-another-reason-to-block-jackson-from-the-supreme-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=36916","title":{"rendered":"Need another reason to block Jackson from the Supreme Court?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. President Bumbles Dementia Biden\u2019s nominee to the United State Supreme Court, Ketanji Brown Jackson, has been going through the confirmation process. What has been coming out regarding her judicial philosophy shows that she shouldn\u2019t have been appointed to any position in the federal court system.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

There are many reasons she should be blocked from the court, including her apparent contempt for the idea of \u201cNatural rights\u201d of the individual American. However it\u2019s her refusal to protect children and punish child molesters that should enrage parents. Here are the details from the Post Millennial<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

In a number of past cases involving child pornography, Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson handed down light sentences that were well below prison recommendations, citing what she sees is a need for a new standard in the criminal evaluation for trials involving child sexual abuse images in the digital age. <\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

An investigation from the <\/b>New York Post<\/b><\/a><\/em> looked into eight child porn cases in which Jackson handed down the lightest possible punishments after hearing harrowing details of “sadomasochistic” torture of young kids including “infants and toddlers,” according to transcripts of sentencing hearings. <\/b><\/p>\n

Switching over to the New York Post\u2019s article<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

In the eight child-porn cases that came before her court, former D.C. District Court Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson heard horrifying details of \u201csadomasochistic\u201d torture of young kids \u2014 including \u201cinfants and toddlers\u201d \u2014 yet challenged the disturbing evidence presented by prosecutors and disregarded their prison recommendations to give the lightest possible punishments in each case, according to transcripts of sentencing hearings obtained by the Post. <\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

To make matter worse, it looks like this…person, hated the fact that she actually had to put these vermin into prison.<\/p>\n

In some cases, she even apologized to some of the kiddie-porn perverts for having to follow the statutes, which she called \u201csubstantially flawed.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

Flawed? Excuse me, but how are laws designed to keep child predators off the streets flawed? And why is that her concern? I do know of one case where an innocent person was accused of having this crap on his business computer. The incompetent investigation into how the images came to be on the computer almost destroyed the person\u2019s life.<\/p>\n

It turned out that the equipment had been assigned to someone else, and when it was turned in, it hadn\u2019t been erased and reloaded, just sent out to the new user. It was that person\u2019s lawyers who discovered the truth. I\u2019ve also heard of a case where \u201cInvestigators\u201d knew exactly where to look on the file system of a \u201ctarget\u2019s\u201d computer.<\/p>\n

Again, it was the \u201ctarget\u2019s\u201d own people who found out that the trash had been planted and the forensic investigators receiving an \u201cAnonymous tip\u201d on where to look. (As I recall, it was really buried in the windows directory, not someplace a normal user would even know to go into) Other then these two cases, most of these pervs should be locked up tight.<\/p>\n

Over and over, the records reveal, Jackson made excuses for the sex fiends\u2019 criminal behavior and cut them slack in defiance of investigators and prosecutors \u2014 and sometimes even probation officers serving her court \u2014 who argued for tougher sentences because the cases were particularly egregious or the defendants weren\u2019t remorseful. <\/b><\/p>\n

Vermin who touch children like this need the key thrown away. Of course, she is just the sort of judge that the Senile Pedophile, Joe Biden would want on the bench. His own sick behavior when it comes to grabbing girls and sniffing their hair is both known and buried by the Democrat Propaganda Corps.<\/p>\n

The NY Post story goes into detail regarding the slime that Jackson wanted to let off. I\u2019ll be honest. Staking them out on an ant hill populated by fire ants would be to good for them. Instead, Jackson looked for ways to let these pigs go.<\/p>\n

\u201cI\u2019m really reluctant to get into the nature of the porn,\u201d Jackson told the court before sentencing Cooper to prison time short of what the prosecution recommended. <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cI don\u2019t find persuasive the government\u2019s arguments concerning why they think that this is a particularly egregious child pornography offense, which means I struggled to find a good reason to impose a sentence that is more severe in this case,\u201d she argued. <\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Jackson cited \u201cmitigating factors,\u201d including letters family members sent to her describing Cooper as \u201ckind, hard-working, dependable, loving. I have no reason to doubt those representations.\u201d Striking a sympathetic tone, she advised the defendant: \u201cThere are going to be a lot of restrictions that the law places on you because you are a convicted sex offender, and you\u2019re going to need the support of these people during this next phase of your life.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

Statements like this make me think that Jackson shouldn\u2019t the subject confirmation hearing, but an Impeachment hearing. This creature appears to have gone out of her way to not actually do her job.<\/p>\n

In her 2013 sentencing of Wesley Keith Hawkins, who was busted posting videos on YouTube of boys as young as 11 being raped by men, Jackson gave the young gay black man essentially a slap on the wrist \u2014 and then apologized to him for it. Instead of the two years of prison prosecutors asked for, she gave him just three months and sent him to a lower-security facility and even arranged special protections for his safety normally afforded cops sent to prison. <\/b><\/p>\n

\u201cI am not persuaded that two years in prison is necessary,\u201d she ruled, arguing that such a sentence does not account for mitigating factors, including \u201cMr. Hawkin\u2019s \u2026 future potential.\u201d (Further explaining her decision, she disputed the severity of the evidence investigators presented and suggested the more than 600 images they caught him with \u201cdon\u2019t signal an especially heinous or egregious child pornography offense.\u201d) <\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Jackson has also shown a complete lack of concern regarding these criminals getting out and harming children. For instance, we have Neil Alexander Stewart. I won\u2019t bother going into the perversions this sicko is into. In front of a normal judge, this scumbag would have been dropped into gen pop, (General population), and been left there for many, many years. (Provided the other convicts didn\u2019t shank him in the showers)<\/p>\n

Instead, he was another recipient of Judge Jackson\u2019s refusal to do her job. He was released and, surprising no one, attacked children. This was brought up during her confirmation hearings. Her response is cringe worthy.<\/p>\n

\u201cWould it surprise you to learn that Mr. Stewart is a recidivist?\u201d asked Sen. Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican. \u201cHe [has] warrants issued again for his arrest, just three years after your sentencing.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

Jackson\u2019s response?<\/p>\n

Shrugged Jackson: \u201cYou know, Senator, there is data in the Sentencing Commission and elsewhere that indicates that there are serious recidivism issues. And so among the various people that I\u2019ve sentenced, I\u2019m not surprised that there are people who reoffend, and it is a terrible thing that happens in our system.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n

Well guess what you stuttering thundercunt. If you had done your job, he would still be in prison. It\u2019s obvious you have a soft spot, (Probably in your head), for pedophiles. It makes me wonder if you aren\u2019t one yourself? Should we be digging into your electronic systems? Or are you just another Soros judicial plant?<\/p>\n

Frankly, I don\u2019t care. As far as I\u2019m concerned, you are unfit to be appointed to the Supreme Court. As far as I am concerned, you are unfit to serve in your current position. The sad thing is, you\u2019re probably going to win confirmation. However, I wouldn\u2019t get to attached to the job. You might be the second Justice to ever be impeached and the first to be convicted and removed. If the miracle happens and the Communazis decide you\u2019re to \u201cHot\u201d and they don\u2019t confirm you, I would expect congressional investigations into your behavior as one of the infamous \u201cObama Judges\u201d in the next 2-4 years.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Thatisall<\/p>\n\"1\"2\"3\"4\"5 (3<\/strong> votes, average: 5.00<\/strong> out of 5)
<\/span><\/span>Loading...<\/span>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n