![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/angry.net\/blog2\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/10\/DaffyScrewball.gif\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Recently, a recorded Zoom call showed that she wants to be able to edit tweets. Not her own tweets, but everyone else’s. Here are some of the details from Red State<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n Dictator Mary Poppins and head of the \u201cDisinformation Governance Board,\u201d Nina Jankowicz, has proven herself to be something of a nutcase<\/a> and the more that comes out about her, the worse she looks. <\/b><\/p>\n As posted by the Post Millennial, a clip of Jankowicz was released where she spoke about her power as a verified person on Twitter and how she should be able to use that as a way to edit the tweets of the non-verified peasantry. <\/b><\/p>\n As you should know, I have a twitter account<\/a> that I use to announce new posts to all 12 of my followers. (I almost never see retweets), I don\u2019t spend much time on twitter, perhaps a few minutes a week to see if anyone looked at my postings. (In general, nope) I\u2019ve never bothered to \u201cGet verified\u201d for the simple reason that the Angry Webmaster is my Nom de Plume and I don\u2019t meet the criteria to get verified. (I won\u2019t list my actual personal information) I have little doubt that this psychotic moonbat wouldn\u2019t hesitate to \u201cEdit\u201d whatever I put up.<\/p>\n Jancowikz starts off by telling her fellows in a Zoom call she\u2019s in that she\u2019s verified and while others are verified they shouldn\u2019t be, not because they\u2019re not real people, but effectively because they have different opinions than her and are not \u201ctrustworthy.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n Oh really. I think it\u2019s a safe bet that this totalitarian twat wouldn\u2019t hesitate to \u201cedit\u201d or remove all of my posts. I\u2019m definitely not someone she would consider \u201ctrustworthy.\u201d<\/p>\n She then expresses the idea that verified people like herself should be able to \u201cedit Twitter\u201d in the same way people can edit Wikipedia, and be able to \u201cadd context to certain tweets.\u201d She, of course, gives an example that involves Trump. <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cIf President Trump were still on Twitter and tweeted a claim about voter fraud, someone could add context from one of the 60 lawsuits that went through the court or something that an election official in one of the states said,\u201d said Jankowicz. \u201cPerhaps your own secretary of state and his news conferences. Something like that.\u201d <\/b><\/p>\n \u201cAdding context so that people have a fuller picture rather than just an individual claim on a tweet,\u201d said added.<\/b><\/p>\n Well I see that the head of the disinformation board is all set to provide plenty of misinformation. Not one single judge would allow any of those cases to proceed. Not because there wasn\u2019t any evidence, but because they didn\u2019t want to actually do their jobs and enforce the laws. Their usual excuses were \u201cIt\u2019s to soon,\u201d or \u201cit\u2019s to late\u201d with their final standby being \u201cYou have no standing to file the case.\u201d<\/p>\n Since the election, there have been a number of audits showing real issues, and the release of Dinesh D\u2019Souza\u2019s 2000 Mules<\/a> is now getting the attention form state law enforcement officials.<\/p>\n Of course, this is just pure narrative manipulation. As Rand Paul previously pointed out, the federal government doesn\u2019t even know what the truth is or what is and isn\u2019t disinformation half the time. Jankowicz, and people like her, being able to swoop in and add their own commentary to a tweet you created would be narrative reinforcement strictly based on her opinion. <\/b><\/p>\n In Jankowicz twisted totalitarian mind, her opinion is the only valid one. How she was selected for this position, which is blatantly unconstitutional in any case, is a mystery to me. The good news is that this idea has angered people on both sides of the political aisle, and as more information comes out showing what a complete screwball Jankowicz is, the sooner this bureau is shut down and everyone involved fired. Sadly it might take the Midterm elections and the new congress to zero out the funding for this. If you need a reason to vote out a Democratic Communazi, this is a good one.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n