{"id":37954,"date":"2022-08-12T16:50:44","date_gmt":"2022-08-12T20:50:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=37954"},"modified":"2022-08-12T16:50:44","modified_gmt":"2022-08-12T20:50:44","slug":"after-initial-denial-garland-announces-he-approved-raid-on-mar-a-lago","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=37954","title":{"rendered":"After initial denial, Garland announces he approved raid on Mar-a-Lago"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. There is a lot going on the last few days since the FBI raided the home of President Trump. FBI Director Wray blathered about the threats<\/a> against him, Garland and the FBI. Now the corrupt Attorney General, Merrick Garland, has announced that her personally approved the order to raid the home of the Greatest President of the 21st<\/sup> Century, Donald Trump.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

This is, of course, a breaking story. Garland has also said the warrant will be unsealed. There are going to be a lot of questions from Congress about this, with the Communazis who currently control the House and Senate running interference. Here are some of the details we have from Fox News<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

Attorney General Merrick Garland said he “personally approved” the decision to seek a search warrant for former President Trump\u2019s<\/a> private residence at Mar-a-Lago, saying the Justice Department has filed a motion to unseal the search warrant and property receipt from the FBI’s raid, amid “substantial public interest” in the matter, while defending the “integrity” of law enforcement officials.\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The integrity of the FBI agents who rifled through Melania Trump\u2019s closets and underwear drawer? Did they think that the documents were hidden in one of her braziers? From what I\u2019ve been hearing, everything was locked in a storage container and they knew right where the documents were because President Trump\u2019s people told them.<\/p>\n

The raid was related to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) effort to collect records and materials the former president took with him from Washington, D.C., to Mar-a-Lago–a matter the agency referred to the Justice Department.\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

“Since I became attorney general,<\/a> I have made clear that the Department of Justice will speak through its court filings and its work just now,” Garland said. “The Justice Department has filed a motion in the southern district of Florida to unseal a search warrant and property receipt relating to a court approved search that the FBI conducted earlier this week. That search was a premises located in Florida belonging to the former president.”<\/b><\/p>\n

How about the 30 million documents Obama walked out of the White House with? Are you going to send a raid team after those as well?<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Garland said copies of both the warrant and the FBI property receipt “were provided on the day of the search to the former president’s counsel, who was on site during the search.”\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n

“The search warrant was authorized by a federal court upon the required finding of probable cause,” Garland said, adding that “the property receipt is a document that federal law requires law enforcement agents to leave with the property owner.”\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n

That\u2019s not what we\u2019re hearing. The word is that an agent basically waved the warrant in the general direction of the lawyer who was on site and he or she was not allowed to read it nor was it or a copy left behind. Obviously, I\u2019m no expert on these sorts of things, but I thought that the warrant had to be left on site and be provided to the owner or his\/her representatives at the time of the search. I\u2019ll let those better schooled in these matters comment.<\/p>\n

Garland said the Justice Department filed the motion to make public the warrant and receipt “in light of the former president’s public confirmation of the search, the surrounding circumstances and the substantial public interest in this matter.”<\/strong><\/p>\n

People would also like to know why it was sealed in the first place, and why it wasn\u2019t unsealed as soon as it was served? (Oh, right, they didn\u2019t actually serve it in the first place, did they?)<\/p>\n

“Faithful adherence to the rule of law is the bedrock principle of Justice Department and of our democracy,” Garland said. “Upholding the rule of law means applying the law evenly without fear or favor under my watch. That is precisely what the Justice Department is doing.”\u00a0 <\/b><\/p>\n