{"id":3944,"date":"2011-05-07T11:55:04","date_gmt":"2011-05-07T15:55:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=3944"},"modified":"2014-11-04T07:35:08","modified_gmt":"2014-11-04T12:35:08","slug":"osama-bin-laden-is-still-dead","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=3944","title":{"rendered":"Osama Bin Laden is still dead"},"content":{"rendered":"

It’s been a week since the news exploded across the world that Osama Bin Laden had a fatal encounter with a Navy SEAL. It’s been an interesting week.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span>First the Obama Administration couldn’t get its stories straight on what and how it happened. It seems that one of the clowns in that administration thought to wait until the SEAL team had been formally debriefed and an after action report written. Then it was announced that ObL was buried at sea 24 hours after his brains were blown out the back of his head. (Nice shot Navy!) Oh, they gave him full Islamic rights. This made a number of people angry, especially in the Muslim world. It seems that burial at sea is a sin.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Oops! \ud83d\ude42<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

In the United States, people were upset that ObL wasn’t stuffed and mounted on the Brooklyn Bridge. Another issue was the photos taken of ObL sans brains. People, especially the survivors of the 9\/11 attacks, are furious that ObL was accorded more respect then any of his victims and that the death photos will not be released. It seems that the Obama administration is more concerned about how Muslims will react to the pictures then helping the families of the people who have died due to ObL have some form of closure. This isn’t to surprising since Obama seems to care more about what Muslims think than what Americans want.<\/p>\n

In Europe, the moonbats are in full flight and barking up a storm. They think that a Navy SEAL shooting ObL in the head is a violation of his rights and was illegal. They think ObL should have been arrested and tried in court. Apparently, some 65% of Europeans think this way. (I’ve heard that the British people think just the opposite from the EU elites. Plugging ObL was the right thing to do) It’s gotten so bad that when German Chancellor Andrea Merkel commented that she thought shooting down ObL like the rabid dog he was, a German judge filed criminal charges against her! ((Heinz Uthmann, Moron<\/a>)) This moronic judge isn’t alone. Most of the Germans think the same way. Of course, Germany and most of the western European countries have allowed a large and unassimilated Muslim immigrant population inside their borders, and they are terrified of offending them. They might do something drastic like KILL ANYONE WHO ISN\u201dT MUSLIM!!!<\/p>\n

The Europeans over the last 50 years have become complete and utter wimps. I guess you could blame the United States for this. After all, we did kick the living snot out of Germany…Twice. I think it’s time to start re-evaluating our relationships with western Europe starting with NATO. Our so called allies have done everything they can to help our enemies and screw us over. The only exceptions to this are the British and the Eastern European countries. ((Thanks Poland! You guys were great in Iraq. 2 thumbs up!))<\/p>\n

In the United States we have a thriving colony of left wing moonbats. They truly believe that the United States deserves every bad thing that happens to it, and that ObL was justified in his attacks. They also think we should have arrested ObL and put him on trial in NYC. ((Attorney General Eric Holder is one such person))<\/p>\n

It never crosses the minds of these idiots that putting Osama bin Laden on trial in a U.S. Courtroom would be a security nightmare. You would have half the RIF’s ((Radical Islamic Fundamentalist)) on earth kidnapping Americans as well as conducting terror attacks in the United States. The backlash against both Muslims and the Obama administration would have been intense, and probably violent.<\/p>\n

And then there is the problem of evidence.<\/p>\n

From what little I know, most of the evidence against ObL would be considered tainted. It was gathered through the use of Signals Intelligence ((Signals Intelligence<\/a>)), hearsay and extreme interrogation methods ((Waterboarding)). This is just the sort of things defense lawyers love. Almost all the evidence against Bin Laden would have been tossed out. There would have been a better then even chance that he would have been acquitted of the 9\/11 attacks that killed 3000 people.<\/p>\n

If that had happened, a Bill of Impeachment would have been brought against Barack Obama within hours. With the exceptions of the hard left in Congress ((Pelosi, Reid, etc)), Obama, Holder and probably Biden would have been tried and convicted of Malfeasance of Office ((Malfeasance of Office explained<\/a>)) and booted out. The following election, (2012) would probably eviscerate the Democrats and quite a few \u201cmoderate\u201d republicans from office at all levels. The new crop that came in would make a number of changes that would alter this country forever. ((See Tom Kratman’s novel Caliphate<\/a>\"\"for an idea of what could happen))<\/p>\n

No, terminating ObL on sight with extreme prejudiced was exactly the right thing to do. The wrong things to do was to:<\/p>\n