{"id":39650,"date":"2023-02-01T18:58:47","date_gmt":"2023-02-01T23:58:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=39650"},"modified":"2023-02-01T18:58:47","modified_gmt":"2023-02-01T23:58:47","slug":"the-maladministration-is-demanding-a-return-to-mandated-masks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/angry.net\/blog2\/?p=39650","title":{"rendered":"The maladministration is demanding a return to mandated masks"},"content":{"rendered":"

Good day all. One of the most hated symbols of the Panicdemic was people being forced to wear useless face masks. People were arrested and jailed for not wearing masks. Finally, the courts stepped in and declared the mandates to be unconstitutional, and when it was announced on planes in flight, the masks came off with loud cheers and applause.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The mandates were imposed by Fauci and the other tyrannical liars at the Centers for Disease Control even thought they knew that masks and that 6 foot separation order were absolutely useless. It was instituted as a means to impose their will on the population. Now that the courts struck this down, almost no businesses still force people to wear masks, (There is one near my Real World Job. I don\u2019t go there), and people still wearing them are basically laughed it.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The problem now, as always, is the Biden maladministration. The utterly corrupt and incompetent, (in all ways including mentally), Joe Biden, are trying to reimpose the mandates on the American people. Here are the details from the Post Millennial<\/b><\/a>:<\/p>\n

The Biden administration is appealing the federal court decision from nine months ago that struck down the government’s face mask mandate on public transportation.<\/strong><\/p>\n

And why are they appealing the decision that is one of the most universally popular ones issued in recent memory? Simple really. It\u2019s all about absolute power.<\/p>\n

The Justice Department on Tuesday claimed in the 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals that it had every right to force the public<\/a> to mask up on planes, trains and buses, the\u00a0Washington Examiner<\/a>\u00a0reported. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Flipping over to the Washington Examiner story<\/b><\/a>, we have more details on how the CDC decided they were the absolute rulers of America and the laws and Constitution be damned.<\/p>\n

The Justice Department claimed that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention<\/a> had the legal authority to immediately require masks on planes, trains, and buses due to the COVID-19 pandemic<\/a> before a panel of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. <\/b><\/p>\n

“Wearing a mask was one of the most modest and most effective means available in early 2021 to combat the spread of COVID-19 and to allow air travel to resume safely. The CDC had authority to issue this order and to do so, to make the order effective immediately and the district court erred in ruling otherwise,” an attorney for the Justice Department argued. <\/b><\/p>\n

Oh they didn\u2019t bring that one out, that masks were effective, did they? Why yes, the fools did. It was known long before the Great Panicedemic of 2020 that masks, with very few, highly specialized models, were utterly worthless in blocking the Coronavirus, or any virus for that matter. Even the person who caused all this with his biowarfare research in Wuhan, China, Anthony Fauci, said they were ineffective in the very early days of the fraudemic. But then, it was never about public health and safety now, was it?<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

A lawyer on behalf of the Health Freedom Defense Fund and two individual plaintiffs, Ana Daza and Sarah Pope, who had filed the original lawsuit, argued that the federal mask mandate was arbitrary and that if the original decision was overturned, it could mean that similar mask mandates “deemed necessary to protect public health” could be put in place in the future. <\/b><\/p>\n

“This appeal is not about an urgent matter of public health. If the mask order had been such an urgent matter of public health, you would have expected CDC to have applied for a stay to the district court’s ruling,” an attorney representing the Health Freedom Defense Fund said. “CDC promulgated a rule of unprecedented scope. And for the first time claiming authority to directly govern the lives of every member of the traveling public without bothering to explain its statutory authority.” <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

We have seen the regulatory state usurping the authority to make laws from the legislative branch for some time. The most recent attempts have come from the BATFE, first with bump stocks and now pistol braces. For to long the courts walked away from their duties to protect the Constitutional powers of the legislative branch and have only recently started slapping them down.<\/p>\n

As we are now seeing, especially with the tyrannical Biden maladministration, anything that strips power away from the Democrats<\/i><\/span> government is wrong and must be stopped, hence the appeal 9 MONTHS after the initial ruling.<\/p>\n

A panel of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals pushed back on the Biden administration’s argument that the CDC had “good cause” to forgo a provision of the federal Administrative Procedure Act, which requires that the government give the public proper time to review and comment on the mask rule before it was put in place, typically 30 days notice. <\/b><\/p>\n

“The problem I’m having with your entire argument on this issue is that it seems like you’re saying the agency can just say we think this is a good idea,” one judge said. <\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

It’s unclear what it would mean if the appeals court overturns Mizelle’s ruling, as most masking requirements have been relaxed across the country for months. The Justice Department has argued the initial ruling should have only granted exemptions to the mask mandate for the plaintiffs in the original lawsuit. <\/b><\/p>\n

Oh I can tell you what it means. 5 minutes later that senile retard will sign an executive order forcing everyone to wear masks or be jailed.<\/p>\n

Republicans immediately blasted the Justice Department’s decision to appeal, fearing a return to mask mandates. <\/b><\/p>\n

“If you want to wear a mask on a plane, no one’s stopping you,” Florida Rep. Brian Mast tweeted. “But we\u2019re not going back to mandates. Period.” <\/b><\/p>\n

Nice words Representative Mast, but if you think the maladministration or the bureaucrats give a damn what you or anyone else thinks, you have another thing comping. They don\u2019t. There is only one thing that will stop the bureaucrats, (Lawfully that is. I can think of way to many unlawful ways to stop them, and I\u2019m just an amateur), and that is gutting their budgets.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Personally, I think that the courts have seen the writing on the wall and understand that it\u2019s now time to step in and clean up the mess they helped cause over the last 80+ years. There is so much information coming out, much of it due to Elon Musk and the Twitter Files of the flat out suppression of the constitutional rights by the bureaucracy and the current maladministration, that the courts are going to uphold the original decision.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

It will be interesting to see if the maladministration loses again if they go to the Supreme Court. While they are stupid enough, there might be a few with 2 or more functioning brain cells in the maladministration who might want to hold off appealing another loss. If they do and lose, then it\u2019s possible that the originalists will slam down hard on the bureaucrats and strip them of most of the authority they have already usurped. Hmm, perhaps it should go to the Supreme Court after all.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Thatisall<\/p>\n\"1\"2\"3\"4\"5 (3<\/strong> votes, average: 5.00<\/strong> out of 5)
<\/span><\/span>Loading...<\/span>\n

~The Angry Webmaster~<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n